From what I know and what I'm used, a self explanatory code is a good documentation, at first.Quote:
Och I like argument ad personam and I know.
I don't except antything it's you project.
I can't in CPP and push only small changes. I don't evaluate your code, but the whole project, without documentation has no value.
Lack of documentation is the main problem, most people on this forum haven't experience with programming (like me XD).
PS. Keep calm and more chilled gentlemans.
PS2. Nestle developing is serious business
Secondly, there are unit tests written by Roxeez (even thought it does not cover all use cases, it supports most common cases), it's another kind of documentation.
Thirdly, most of methods are documented, any sense developer that sees Roxeez's project would use it as a submodule repository (no other choice, there is no package yet published), the source is accessible.
And, my point of view is that Roxeez wastes his time on this project because there are only few able to use that.
Also cause this community does not deserve that kind of work, people will just leech it or expect a drag & drop project to make money with it rather than supporting Roxeez's work.
But I still respect his choice and his work.