[Release] Get Player Structure Call

Page 2 of 2 1 2
10/07/2015 23:04 BytePipe#16
Ahaha, Faze'is awwwesuume :cool:
10/08/2015 00:30 alexmen10#17
Quote:
Originally Posted by golle12 View Post
was only an example ô.o
Example work :
Code:
                
                        mov ebx, [IDplayer] 
			push ebx
			call   S4Client.exe+AE370
			mov     ecx, eax
			call   S4Client.exe+AE9260 //TouchDown
			ret
			nop
10/08/2015 11:28 RingleRangleRob#18
Quote:
Originally Posted by makoyecol View Post
i really dont understand that S4Client.exe + ???? please help me to understand it :D
Base Address of S4Client.exe + Offset

Quote:
Originally Posted by alexmen10 View Post
Example work :
Code:
                
                        mov ebx, [IDplayer] 
			push ebx
			call   S4Client.exe+AE370
			mov     ecx, eax
			call   S4Client.exe+AE9260 //TouchDown
			ret
			nop
useless nop :/
10/08/2015 13:46 BytePipe#19
Quote:
Originally Posted by alexmen10 View Post
Exaūmple work :
Code:
                
                        mov ebx, [IDplayer] 
			push ebx
			call   S4Client.exe+AE370
			mov     ecx, eax
			call   S4Client.exe+AE9260 //TouchDown
			ret
			nop
You can do so MANY with Player ID's, AE370 is not the only class ;)
10/08/2015 16:22 Cyrex'#20
Quote:
Originally Posted by Successfully View Post
You can do so MANY with Player ID's, AE370 is not the only class ;)
are you kidding actually? base + ae370 isnt a class, allocated classes are in .data/.rdata this is a call and in the .code section

ontopic: good job faze ;)

edit: Y U NO USE THE THIS PTR DIRECTLY WITHIN THE CLASS?!??

if you have the instance you can reverse the object and within that the function is either in a vftable or a normal function. it would be way easier to use and more efficient.

But good work
10/08/2015 20:45 BytePipe#21
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyrex' View Post
are you kidding actually? base + ae370 isnt a class, allocated classes are in .data/.rdata this is a call and in the .code section

ontopic: good job faze ;)

edit: Y U NO USE THE THIS PTR DIRECTLY WITHIN THE CLASS?!??

if you have the instance you can reverse the object and within that the function is either in a vftable or a normal function. it would be way easier to use and more efficient.

But good work
For sure it isnt a class. Assembly language dont know directly the Word "class" or "struct". Classes themselfes are primarily only used in real object oriented programming languages. It's actual clear that my indirect statement should clarifies the sense/purpose of function pointers.
10/19/2015 16:01 Cyrex'#22
Quote:
Originally Posted by Successfully View Post
For sure it isnt a class. Assembly language dont know directly the Word "class" or "struct". Classes themselfes are primarily only used in real object oriented programming languages. It's actual clear that my indirect statement should clarifies the sense/purpose of function pointers.
nah its not that clear
Page 2 of 2 1 2