can c# do low level stuff?

05/23/2011 08:48 BaussHacker#16
Quote:
Originally Posted by IAmHawtness View Post
This does exactly the same as the BlackMagic library, fyi.
It's a really bad way of executing assembly instructions inside your own program.
Yea. It's a pretty sloppy code. Also pretty long and confusing. It would be 100x times easier to use C++ than this.
05/26/2011 22:43 fm_sparkart#17
Quote:
Originally Posted by IAmHawtness View Post
Or make a C++ DLL that you would call from your C# program to execute the specific assembler instructions.
Then you might as well use C++.
05/26/2011 22:49 IAmHawtness#18
Quote:
Originally Posted by fm_sparkart View Post
Then you might as well use C++.
If you want to assembly instructions in C#, then yeah. It's not supported in C#, therefore the best way to obtain this is by making a C++ DLL.
05/26/2011 22:54 BaussHacker#19
Quote:
Originally Posted by IAmHawtness View Post
If you want to assembly instructions in C#, then yeah. It's not supported in C#, therefore the best way to obtain this is by making a C++ DLL.
Which makes it kind of waste. Why not just go straight CPP? :)
05/27/2011 02:49 IAmHawtness#20
Quote:
Originally Posted by BaussHacker View Post
Which makes it kind of waste. Why not just go straight CPP? :)
Because of the .NET Framework
Unless, of course, you're talking about C++.NET, I guess the reason would be that people prefer C# syntax? I don't know really.
05/27/2011 19:25 BaussHacker#21
Quote:
Originally Posted by IAmHawtness View Post
Because of the .NET Framework
Unless, of course, you're talking about C++.NET, I guess the reason would be that people prefer C# syntax? I don't know really.
I was talking about unmanaged.
05/27/2011 21:49 IAmHawtness#22
Quote:
Originally Posted by BaussHacker View Post
I was talking about unmanaged.
Then I'd have to say that it's because of the .NET Framework that people would rather use C#