[Release] - uNf Trainer

11/04/2015 19:42 Ploxasarus#2296
Quote:
Originally Posted by billyhax View Post
update
---- Unf v4.0 ----
  • Ontop checkbox replaced with button, arrow up^ now sets form atop all other windows.
  • Entire form is now draggable.
  • Updated for recent patch.
11/04/2015 20:53 toasted pancake#2297
Love Unf and Mini ESP. Thanks for making them.

I have a request though. First let me explain why I want it. I have the the FoV in the actual game settings turned to max. Every time I launch Unf it actually moves me FoV inward to a lesser point than the game itself has for me. Could you add a check box to turn the FoV on and off like the Speed has?

Thanks again for all the hard work and quick updates.
11/04/2015 22:06 RadicalFizzbin#2298
Not sure how difficult it would be, but will there be support for the GW2 64-bit client?
11/05/2015 02:30 XYLUM#2299
I was curious if you had plans to do a 64 bit variant as well...

Regardless, thanks for all your time and efforts!
11/05/2015 05:57 masterman#2300
Quote:
Originally Posted by XYLUM View Post
I was curious if you had plans to do a 64 bit variant as well...

Regardless, thanks for all your time and efforts!
Very much this. Not looking to make demands, just curious.
11/05/2015 07:10 username1042#2301
Quote:
Originally Posted by masterman View Post
Very much this. Not looking to make demands, just curious.
It might be as simple as changing the process onto which Unf applies itself. You can see that the normal GW2 version is named "Gw2.exe" whereas the 64 bit version is named "Gw2-64.exe".

- I don't claim to know what I'm talking about - just interested in this.
11/05/2015 08:48 masterman#2302
Quote:
Originally Posted by XYLUM View Post
I was curious if you had plans to do a 64 bit variant as well...

Regardless, thanks for all your time and efforts!
Quote:
Originally Posted by username1042 View Post
It might be as simple as changing the process onto which Unf applies itself. You can see that the normal GW2 version is named "Gw2.exe" whereas the 64 bit version is named "Gw2-64.exe".

- I don't claim to know what I'm talking about - just interested in this.
Unfortunately it wont work. The addresses for the hacks will be in different places in a 64-bit client. Same reason why it needs an update every now and then as patches come out :(
11/05/2015 09:53 username1042#2303
Quote:
Originally Posted by masterman View Post
Unfortunately it wont work. The addresses for the hacks will be in different places in a 64-bit client. Same reason why it needs an update every now and then as patches come out :(
Do you mean the current addresses won't work for the 64 bit version? How about a modified Unf which uses the 64 bit adresses?
11/05/2015 10:29 masterman#2304
Quote:
Originally Posted by username1042 View Post
Do you mean the current addresses won't work for the 64 bit version? How about a modified Unf which uses the 64 bit adresses?
Yep, that's right. The 32-bit client will have addresses (or memory offsets) in different locations to the 64-bit client.

A modified Unf for the 64-bit client is exactly what would be needed. That's what we're praying for :handsdown:
11/05/2015 17:09 xg.france#2305
i'll be interested in a Unf-64 too ;)
11/05/2015 23:20 P¡nguu#2306
can you code a teleporter?
11/06/2015 05:09 username1042#2307
Quote:
Originally Posted by m4a_X View Post
can you code a teleporter?
This is probably speculation, but I think there was a very high ban rate for people using teleport. For this reason the teleport function was not included (citation needed). Pl0x can confirm or deny this but it's just my take on it. However, I would imagine that it is relatively straightfoward to implement.
11/06/2015 06:52 donfandango#2308
With everyone always asking about updates and shizz - I thought I'd just drop by and say thanks for your work, it's been quite helpful :)
11/06/2015 12:19 Ploxasarus#2309
Quote:
Originally Posted by username1042 View Post
This is probably speculation, but I think there was a very high ban rate for people using teleport. For this reason the teleport function was not included (citation needed). Pl0x can confirm or deny this but it's just my take on it. However, I would imagine that it is relatively straightfoward to implement.
Straight forward to implement but not going to be re-added, did have teleport at a time but I removed it during the big ban wave of awhile ago and have not added it back since.
11/06/2015 14:46 Lono Haze#2310
A safe function for settings, like in mini esp, would be great.