It might be as simple as changing the process onto which Unf applies itself. You can see that the normal GW2 version is named "Gw2.exe" whereas the 64 bit version is named "Gw2-64.exe".Quote:
Very much this. Not looking to make demands, just curious.
Quote:
I was curious if you had plans to do a 64 bit variant as well...
Regardless, thanks for all your time and efforts!
Unfortunately it wont work. The addresses for the hacks will be in different places in a 64-bit client. Same reason why it needs an update every now and then as patches come out :(Quote:
It might be as simple as changing the process onto which Unf applies itself. You can see that the normal GW2 version is named "Gw2.exe" whereas the 64 bit version is named "Gw2-64.exe".
- I don't claim to know what I'm talking about - just interested in this.
Do you mean the current addresses won't work for the 64 bit version? How about a modified Unf which uses the 64 bit adresses?Quote:
Unfortunately it wont work. The addresses for the hacks will be in different places in a 64-bit client. Same reason why it needs an update every now and then as patches come out :(
Yep, that's right. The 32-bit client will have addresses (or memory offsets) in different locations to the 64-bit client.Quote:
Do you mean the current addresses won't work for the 64 bit version? How about a modified Unf which uses the 64 bit adresses?
This is probably speculation, but I think there was a very high ban rate for people using teleport. For this reason the teleport function was not included (citation needed). Pl0x can confirm or deny this but it's just my take on it. However, I would imagine that it is relatively straightfoward to implement.Quote:
can you code a teleporter?
Straight forward to implement but not going to be re-added, did have teleport at a time but I removed it during the big ban wave of awhile ago and have not added it back since.Quote:
This is probably speculation, but I think there was a very high ban rate for people using teleport. For this reason the teleport function was not included (citation needed). Pl0x can confirm or deny this but it's just my take on it. However, I would imagine that it is relatively straightfoward to implement.