sticking servers with over 800 players

[elfuria]

Originally Posted by PortalDark

statistics may influence certain things, but sticking a thread just because of the popularity is not fair, not mention creating a 2 page long sticky section
In my opinion(and decision), I won't be sticking the popular servers anytime soon. It is easier for me to ask a little donation and open a vote/rank website then using stickies

mods?

 Spoiler

lol

Of course its fair populated should be rewarded. Why should a server with zero people be on a Most populated sticky thread not for each server but 1 BIG thread? But i can also understand if nobody wants to do it xD id rather hve that then saying its unfair

[[B]ase[J]umP]

Originally Posted by dimkacool

No.

Nowadays, people don't know a **** about being a fair competitor.
Remember PlaySRO?

remember ecsro/zszc/elitesro?now THAT was competition

[Kape7]

Quality != Amount of players

[elfuria]

how do you define quality on sro? its all the same **** get to max and then pvp. and not to be rude your server had "the best edits" and it was less than 200 people every day -_-
and on sro more people = better, and just look at aion that **** was supposed to be better than wow which it is but can't get more players than it

[Qynchou]

Originally Posted by elfuria

how do you define quality on sro? its all the same **** get to max and then pvp. and not to be rude your server had "the best edits" and it was less than 200 people every day -_-
and on sro more people = better, and just look at aion that **** was supposed to be better than wow which it is but can't get more players than it

well obviously you havent seen venture yet

[Krunchy*]

Originally Posted by Qynchou

well obviously you havent seen venture yet

How could we see it without any notice

Originally Posted by Disco Teka

Well, what about the current topsites. Do they support SRO or not?

We're currently working on a small website where you are able to choose and select infos out from a filter (for example top populated, bot allowed, cap etc...). The servers which fit to the requirements will be shown up

[dimkacool]

Originally Posted by [B]ase[J]umP

remember ecsro/zszc/elitesro?now THAT was competition

That was lack of choice. ECSRO/ZSZC was the same.
EliteSRO pwned them when they came out, because of euro.
Now it's pwned because of variety.

[CrazyGirL_ZSZC]

ecsro / zszc was the best p-servers ever !
about elitesro its the first server with eu but if elitesro came when zszc was still on , trust me esro wont be full ^^

[1_3_3_7]

Originally Posted by Synx7

Quality != Amount of players

Actually it's like it depends on what the server contains... some retarded ****** options = shitload of (retarded) players...


Anyawy, I'd much rather play on a server with 300-400 normal players than on server with 1000-1500 retards.

[Krunchy*]

Originally Posted by 1_3_3_7

Actually it's like it depends on what the server contains... some retarded ****** options = shitload of (retarded) players...


Anyawy, I'd much rather play on a server with 300-400 normal players than on server with 1000-1500 retards.

I would take the server with 1000-1500 retards. Just take some friends to the server and have fun fighting vs everyone

[elfuria]

me too i hate pvping the same people over and over