[UNOFFICIAL] List Of Legit and Scam Providers List

[GrawPoint]

Originally Posted by lort1234

What is your thoughts and ideas on the subject about the vouche/review?

Could add the providers that was suggested before but without much information and notes about them?

I agree with you, there should be more info about providers if they would be listed on the thread. The first thing people usually look at is the info/notes section of your thread after UD/DTC status, atleast in my case that's what I do, so having as much info as possible is better, just my thought.

[lort1234]

Originally Posted by GrawPoint

I agree with you, there should be more info about providers if they would be listed on the thread. The first thing people usually look at is the info/notes section of your thread after UD/DTC status, atleast in my case that's what I do, so having as much info as possible is better, just my thought.

That's what i was thinking too, that way people can easily find a provider that fits their needs.

[gduabi]

First of all, thank you for your work here, much appreciation! I stumbled on this when I tried to inform my self about rust cheese. You helped me alot.

What provider would you recommend for legit hacking, looking at the situation rn?

Since im reading what youre all texting, seratonin is a pretty good choice for now isnt it?

The first cheese I tried was, disconnect.wtf, I like the menu and it got all the functions I need /esp,aim,debug + I find the visuals optically attractive. Its easy to buy and set up , the dc is helpful as well.

I tried fluent for rage as well but I dont like the handling at all, and I sadly just joined a day before the banwave, so I wont use this ever again since im not raging anyways.

[gduabi]

Could you maybe help me out with a reseller for seratonin? I see some sites, but they all look so scammy haha?

[lort1234]

Originally Posted by gduabi

Could you maybe help me out with a reseller for seratonin? I see some sites, but they all look so scammy haha?

Deprimereshop is well known here on elitepvpers, he’s def trustworthy.

[GrawPoint]

Originally Posted by gduabi

Could you maybe help me out with a reseller for seratonin? I see some sites, but they all look so scammy haha?

Just use Deprimereshop:

[gduabi]

Originally Posted by lort1234

Deprimereshop is well known here on elitepvpers, he’s def trustworthy.

thank you a lot, much appreciation for this thread. Helps a lot since Im new to rust chit. I tried disconnect.wtf at first, it felt pretty nice, easy to buy and set up. I dont rage at all, so I had a fun time with this. Optically attractive. Helpfull
dc.

Joined fluent 1 day before the ban wave, but even using it didnt feel nice, for me and I didnt like the visuals, since I got banned one day after I wouldnt use it again. dc is bs too.

What would you recommend for right now? Since im playing legit only, using, esp, a little aim and debug. From what I heard seratonin is a pretty good choice atm isnt it?

[gduabi]

disconnect.wtf currently offline, server not working

[lort1234]

Originally Posted by gduabi

disconnect.wtf currently offline, server not working

Loader?

[JustSleepy]

Originally Posted by alexpsp00

In my opinion they shouldn't have a say in whether they want to be on the list or not and should be completely community driven.

Private providers want to stay... private. Usually they have very limited slots so being inundated with 5000 0 rep users begging for a slot daily isn't something they want.

[Krad3z3]

As announced earlier we are close with release of public version and Lort has been already notified about testing it. I am willing to give few more test keys for public version upon release to reputable elitepvpers members.

I don't care if you are reputable on scam servers like OUD and other similar p2get listed communities.

Only EPVP reputable members.

[SauceMachine]

Originally Posted by alexpsp00

In my opinion they shouldn't have a say in whether they want to be on the list or not and should be completely community driven.

I completely agree. A list like this is meant to filter out scams and poor providers. If a provider decides to stay private and not be listed, they could potentially evade scrutiny, which defeats the purpose of the list. The decision should be community-driven to ensure transparency.

[lort1234]

Originally Posted by SauceMachine

I completely agree. A list like this is meant to filter out scams and poor providers. If a provider decides to stay private and not be listed, they could potentially evade scrutiny, which defeats the purpose of the list. The decision should be community-driven to ensure transparency.

I would love to heard suggestions of how these providers should be added, the problem I find is that there isn’t enough information and talk about them to indicate things like performance, stability, win versions etc etc.

That’s why I wanted to have someone that is reputed here on Epvp vouche/review each new cheat added, so all of these information can be gathered for people to see and decide what they wanna use from that information.

It also adds a filter of total scam providers and providers with very poor quality.

As you said, the list is made to filter out scam and poor providers.

[SauceMachine]

Originally Posted by lort1234

I would love to heard suggestions of how these providers should be added, the problem I find is that there isn’t enough information and talk about them to indicate things like performance, stability, win versions etc etc.

That’s why I wanted to have someone that is reputed here on Epvp vouche/review each new cheat added, so all of these information can be gathered for people to see and decide what they wanna use from that information.

It also adds a filter of total scam providers and providers with very poor quality.

As you said, the list is made to filter out scam and poor providers.

I understand the challenge of maintaining a list of private providers, especially with limited publicly available information. One option could be to label these providers as "unverified" until more data becomes available. There might be better approaches, but this could be a good starting point.

[lort1234]

Originally Posted by SauceMachine

I understand the challenge of maintaining a list of private providers, especially with limited publicly available information. One option could be to label these providers as "unverified" until more data becomes available. There might be better approaches, but this could be a good starting point.

That could be a solution, but then again with no verified vouches/reviews, they could literally be scams.

Ofc for known private providers this could be a solution, but for unknown which tier 4 is for, i don’t think it’s a good solution.

I can make a pool asking the community, if they want providers added without any vouches/reviews/information. But then you also open the list up for possible resellers, scams and cheat of poor quality.

And if we do that, in what tier should they be added? Tier 4 is meant to be a tier for new providers to be in until they have proven quality/safety of their products and name.