![Übersetzer EN->DE auf täglicher Basis [B] e*Gold/PP](https://www.elitepvpers.com/forum/iconimages/elite-gold-trading/bersetzer-en-de-auf-t-glicher-basis-b-e-gold-pp_ltr.gif){kind=small}
ich suche jemanden, der mit täglich 5-10 Texte übersetzen kann. Durchschnittlich haben sie etwa 500 Wörter - mal weniger aber auch mal etwas mehr.
ODER: Suche jemanden, der täglich 100 Fragen aus dem Englischen übersetzen kann
Bezahle wöchentlich und würde mit euch einen festen Betrag pro Text ausmachen.
Das ganze soll unbefristet auf täglicher Basis laufen.
Wenn Ihr Zeit habt und euch das zutraut, lasst es mich wissen.
Ich schicke euch dann zwei Beispieltexte und wähle dann nach Qualität aus.
lG
PS: Meldet euch mit einer Preisvorstellung
Beispieltexte
Quote:
No.
For a start, there’s not a lot of selection among humans based on physical attractiveness. In most societies, pretty much everybody who has cared to has been able to get hooked up and have kids. We do these things for reasons having to do with economics and social cohesion and all that sort of thing. The beauty standards of the moment may set up certain preferences, but why we mate and who we mate with takes how we look as one factor among many. Since personality is a factor, we may as well ask if humans get funnier over many generations, since people demonstrably tend to like mates who can make them laugh.
The other thing here is that human beauty standards are largely cultural, not hard-wired into our biology. There are a handful of broadly consistent things we find attractive, like youth and symmetrical facial features. However, beyond that, we constantly construct and reconstruct attractiveness. For example:
This is Clara Bow, an actress of the silent film era. And not just any actress. She was the actress, regarded as the hottest thing on two legs at the time. Now, compare her with this:
The young lady on the right obligingly leaning towards the crowd is Jayne Mansfield. Not the biggest thing of her time, but an exemplar of the “blonde bombshell” type popular in that era, along with Mamie van Doren, the UK’s Sabrina, and of course Marilyn Monroe.
Now, these two pictures were taken maybe thirty years apart. A single society (white America) went from preferring dark, boyish flappers to shiny blondes with curves for days in the course of a single generation. And we could go further and compare both of them to, say, the toned, athletic bodies of a Christie Brinkley or Cindy Crawford in the 80s. This is much, much faster than evolution can keep up with. Since mate selection ultimately isn’t primarily driven by physical attractiveness and our standards of what’s attractive change frequently, then, it’s not something with strong evolutionary pressure behind it. We are not evolving in the direction of being more attractive because for humans, attractiveness is too slippery a quality to evolve towards.
AN AFTERTHOUGHT
I forgot to question the heritability of physical attractiveness more directly. Let’s go back to the Jayne Mansfield example for a moment. Let’s hypothesize that humans have hard-wired standards of beauty and that pretty humans mate with other pretty humans (demonstrably false; see every supermodel ever married to a rich guy, but we’ll keep going anyway) to produce prettier humans. As it happens, Jayne gives us a test case. She married a professional body builder, arguably a guy who was a good match for her in prettiness. So what about their offspring? Shouldn’t their kid be a total sex bomb? Well…
Mariska Hargitay, star of the long-running Law and Order: Special Victims Unit, is the daughter of Jayne Mansfield and bodybuilder Mickey Hargitay. Is she attractive? Certainly. Is she prettier than Jayne Mansfield? I think that’s exactly the point at which we run face-first into questions of “what is attractive?”
Quote:
Ah, movies.
They’re great, right? They kill time in your meaningless life, they tell a story with a camera so vivid you sometimes forget it’s fiction, and they temporarily make you forget about the world we live in. Plenty of thought-provoking or saddening movies exist, but many movies exist so their viewers can feel good, not think.
Because when you think about some of these movies too deeply, you can find your thoughts running away to some pretty dark places.
Case in point, all the examples I’m about to list below. Let’s do this.
Minions (2015)
The plot of this 2015 animated children’s movie can aptly be described in one sentence
A race of genetic yellow freaks become hellbent on villainy, and vow to serve the most evil villain they can find
Throughout the movie’s opening montage, the minions meet several well-known historical and mythological figures, including Count Dracula, Genghis Khan and Napoleon Bonaparte.
This seems innocent at first, especially given the cartoonish depictions of said historical figures in the movie. But an internet user took to Tumblr to analyse exactly what these scenes implied for the minions in the greater historical landscape
According to the official Minions Movie, the Minions:
Assisted Napoleon in invading most of Europe, racking up a total death count of around 3 Million
Assisted Genghis Khan in invading just about all of China and racking up a total death count of roughly 40 Million people
Plus that of the T Rex, Caveman, Pharaoh, King, Captain, and Dracula
So we know for a fact they took part in 43 Million deaths. Not to mention they also killed all of their former masters, so add them to the total.
But this also implies there is a strong chance the Minions are going to kill Gru
Conclusion:
Minions are bloodthirsty monsters that should not be glorified in any way.[1]
I’m no historian, but this all sounds about right to me. It’s horrifying to think that in this universe, minions are responsible for pretty much every war crime and atrocity in human history.
And to make matters even worse, the Minions retire to Antarctica after the fall of Napoleon, where they remain until 1968, when the main plot takes place. The Minions were conveniently exiled during WW2 in order to avoid the implications that the minions were Nazis, but by writing around it, the movie still implies that the minions would have worked for Hitler if they were around.
Wow.
Ratatouille (2007)
Oh look, it’s another critically-adored Pixar film. So sweet, such a milestone for CGI animation, such a beautiful Paris setting, right? A heartwarming story about a rat who pulls the strings (literally) and teaches a man to seem like an amazing chef?
I mean, you’re not wrong. This movie is awesome. But here’s something to think about.
Rats don’t exactly have the longest lifespans. They’re known to die early, and even when they live ‘long’ it’s only around four or five years.
If the laws of the Pixar universe are the same as ours, then Remy and Linguini only have a few years at best before Remy dies and Linguini is left to run his restaurant all alone, having no idea what he’s really doing whatsoever.
Tight.
Cloudy With a Chance Of Meatballs
Food falling from the sky sounds pretty great in theory, but the more you think about it, the more it sucks.
For one, what happens to surplus food? Cause I guarantee you there will be leftovers. There comes a point where a doggie bag won’t get rid of all the residual food after each food rain. Then what? Does the food rot away and decay on the planet’s surface for the rest of history, spreading disease and unhappiness to the people of Swallow Falls?
Oh, and what about allergies? Everything from ice cream to hamburgers to shrimp ends up falling from the sky at one point or another. But what happens to those who are deathly allergic to a food that’s literally falling from the sky?
Those with allergies will suddenly find their life turned into a living hell, one where they can’t even leave the house for fear of severe and potentially fatal allergic reactions.
And don’t even get me started with the spray-on shoes…
Quote:
If you are attracted to people with narcissistic tendencies, it is usually for one or more of the following reasons:
One of your parents had narcissistic traits and you are unconsciously choosing a type of relationship that is familiar to you.
You enjoy the narcissistic courtship style, especially the instant intimacy and over the top idealization of you—and do not understand how temporary it is likely to be.
If the person is a bossy Exhibitionist Narcissist, you might enjoy someone else taking charge or making decisions for you.
If you are a Closet Narcissist, you might idealize the Exhibitionist because he or she dares to take center stage.
You might have low self-esteem and the Narcissist’s devaluation of you resonates with your own opinions.
You are used to being treated badly, so you have set the bar too low.
The person with NPD has other things that you like enough to be willing to put up with his or her narcissistic traits.
You mistake defensive grandiosity for self-confidence.
Punchline: All sorts of people are attracted to people who are narcissistic. In my experience, most of them do not really understand what an ongoing relationship with a Narcissist is likely to be like.
Quote:
It must be this dress. It is so sexy,not only my back is nearly exposed entirely but also it is Short.
I usually wore this dress when I went to night club.Everytime I will get a lot of attention from guys and be accosted by a few.
One time I was accosted by a handsome boy,we chatted to each other happily.We added friends on WeChat when left,and soon we fell in love with each other.He said my back was so beautiful and was attacted by me when I was in backless dress,so I bought a lot of backless dresses including another color one of this style.
We went on a vacation to seaside and had a nice time.He was entirely attracted by all kinds of my backless dresses,and praised that I was the most sexy and appealing girl he ever met.Even though I knew he was flattering me,I was so happy.
Although we broke up now,I can still remember the night I met him and the happy days we spent together.And thanks to this dress ,I can met him.
Quote:
If I had lots of money, I’d dress like a Frenchwoman and here’s why.
French fashion is about following a set of rules and then customising it to your individual taste. It’s about looking effortlessly sophisticated and chic.
It’s about buying expensive things that you will ideally wear all the time, so that’s why French women try to buy classic but very quality pieces that will last 10 years.
It’s about wearing bold but neutral colours such as black, navy, grey, mink (a type of pink also known as millennial pink), beige, brown, khaki green and sometimes orange in the summer.
I try my very best to wear such things but usually, they cost ££££££££££! grrr!
I can only afford clothes from French Connection, M&S, H&M, Uniqlo and Gap - things that last me from 1–5 years.
But I would love to be able to buy from Sandro, Net-a-Porter, Comptoir de Cottonniers, Zadig & Voltaire or their British counterparts: COS, LK Bennett, Jigsaw, but I can’t because a basic coat would cost me £225 and last for 10 years when I could get one from Zara for £75.
