|
You last visited: Today at 14:38
Advertisement
[OpenSource Project] C++ CoCore
Discussion on [OpenSource Project] C++ CoCore within the CO2 Private Server forum part of the Conquer Online 2 category.
11/21/2010, 23:41
|
#46
|
elite*gold: 0 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,216
Received Thanks: 793
|
Can I have a question? How is your Queue implementation differing from the std::queue in the STL?
|
|
|
|
11/22/2010, 18:53
|
#47
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 754
Received Thanks: 544
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KraHen
Can I have a question? How is your Queue implementation differing from the std::queue in the STL?
|
The main reason I made my own class would be because I'm offering a multithreaded core.
|
|
|
|
|
11/22/2010, 20:01
|
#48
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,216
Received Thanks: 793
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ImmuneOne
The main reason I made my own class would be because I'm offering a multithreaded core.
|
My bad, lol. I didn`t realize STL containers weren`t thread-safe ones  Ty 
|
|
|
|
|
11/23/2010, 01:00
|
#49
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 754
Received Thanks: 544
|
EDIT: Sticking to the server core plan.
|
|
|
|
|
12/18/2010, 04:25
|
#50
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 754
Received Thanks: 544
|
NOTE: This project is not abandoned. I had some busy weeks at school and since I got 2 weeks off of school, I can get back to work on CoCore.
|
|
|
|
|
12/18/2010, 12:33
|
#51
|
elite*gold: 20
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,012
Received Thanks: 2,882
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KraHen
My bad, lol. I didn`t realize STL containers weren`t thread-safe ones Ty |
Most people will argue otherwise but I think you should avoid STL, and create your own wrappers whenever possible >_>
Edit:
I don't see a use for an IDispoable in C++.
|
|
|
|
|
12/18/2010, 14:19
|
#52
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 390
Received Thanks: 321
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by InfamousNoone
Most people will argue otherwise but I think you should avoid STL, and create your own wrappers whenever possible >_>
|
I find STL pretty handy if you wrap classes around them for your needs, but I don't see why you'd totally avoid them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by InfamousNoone
Edit:
I don't see a use for an IDispoable in C++.
|
It's not IDisposable as in the .NET's IDisposable, same naming but different function. It is just a thread-safe referenced smart pointer which destroys objects after they're done with(from what I know).
|
|
|
|
|
12/18/2010, 21:15
|
#53
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 754
Received Thanks: 544
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nullable
I find STL pretty handy if you wrap classes around them for your needs, but I don't see why you'd totally avoid them.
It's not IDisposable as in the .NET's IDisposable, same naming but different function. It is just a thread-safe referenced smart pointer which destroys objects after they're done with(from what I know).
|
Exactly as this 'unknown' guy above me says
|
|
|
|
|
12/18/2010, 23:53
|
#54
|
elite*gold: 20
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,012
Received Thanks: 2,882
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nullable
I find STL pretty handy if you wrap classes around them for your needs, but I don't see why you'd totally avoid them.
It's not IDisposable as in the .NET's IDisposable, same naming but different function. It is just a thread-safe referenced smart pointer which destroys objects after they're done with(from what I know).
|
Ah ok, that makes a little more sense. The reason I avoid STL is because half the time when you recode the **** yourself it's 1000x faster.
Ok -- I'm exaggerating a bit, but if you really want my test results, I'll go dig up my old FlexibleArray<T> class (which implements all the functionality of a vector<t> and a list<t>) and I'll show you the comparison between the speed. Bricks will be shat.
|
|
|
|
|
12/19/2010, 12:58
|
#55
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 390
Received Thanks: 321
|
It is true that half.. well most of the STL classes are slow but if you test against something like map<key, value>, the results of searching/inserting/removing are pretty close to the R-B trees time complexity ( O(log N) ); so it's not that bad in some cases after all.
|
|
|
|
|
12/19/2010, 13:15
|
#56
|
elite*gold: 20
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,012
Received Thanks: 2,882
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nullable
It is true that half.. well most of the STL classes are slow but if you test against something like map<key, value>, the results of searching/inserting/removing are pretty close to the R-B trees time complexity ( O(log N) ); so it's not that bad in some cases after all.
|
Well, once I first picked up on this; I stayed as far a way from STL as I possibly could. Any chance of you guys actually committing to the revision? I wouldn't mind pitching in a bit of help if you can specify what needs to be done.
Also, I assume you want this to be cross-platform (because your using boost instead of Windows Library functions), correct?
|
|
|
|
|
12/19/2010, 16:26
|
#57
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 754
Received Thanks: 544
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by InfamousNoone
Well, once I first picked up on this; I stayed as far a way from STL as I possibly could. Any chance of you guys actually committing to the revision? I wouldn't mind pitching in a bit of help if you can specify what needs to be done.
Also, I assume you want this to be cross-platform (because your using boost instead of Windows Library functions), correct?
|
The first revision is near to be done, I'm just finishing some network wrappers.
But if you want to see it before the first revision is committed you can send me a PM. Oh and yes this is going to be cross-platform.
|
|
|
|
|
12/19/2010, 16:50
|
#58
|
elite*gold: 20
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,012
Received Thanks: 2,882
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ImmuneOne
The first revision is near to be done, I'm just finishing some network wrappers.
But if you want to see it before the first revision is committed you can send me a PM. Oh and yes this is going to be cross-platform.
|
Ah, ok. No problem. I'll check back now and again then and wait for the first rev'.
|
|
|
|
|
12/22/2010, 06:13
|
#59
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,892
Received Thanks: 918
|
Oh yes. I want this. I'll help as much as I can.
|
|
|
|
|
01/26/2011, 21:12
|
#60
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 754
Received Thanks: 544
|
Little update; I have been offline and not working on the project lately, my laptop has been at repair service for awhile now and the project's files are on it. The thing is I'm struggling with the repair service to take the costs under my warranty. I guess it doesn't count if you have < 10 dead pixels and a burn-in which covers half of the screen:S
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Similar Threads
|
OpenSource -- Newbie Spammer
09/23/2010 - 4Story Hacks, Bots, Cheats & Exploits - 13 Replies
Hello People,
Today im realase an "Newbie Spammer", the Script is OpenSource.
This is an Script for Nobbys.
Thanks.
#RequireAdmin
Global $Timer = TimerInit()
|
OpenSource-Server
05/12/2010 - Metin2 Private Server - 27 Replies
Hi,
morgen beginnt das verlängerte Wochenende für viele. Deshalb starte ich morgen ein neues kleines Projekt.
Einen OpenSource-Metin2-Server. Ich zahle einen kleinen Server (max. 100 Spieler). Die Files dieses Server sind öffentlich, einzige Ausnahme: Account-DB.
Itemshop wird es natürlich nicht geben!
Vielleicht gibt es ja ein paar nette Leute, die Lust hätten zu helfen. :)
Der Servername wird "Syrka" (Syrka.net) lauten.
MfG,
|
WowSharp wird Opensource!
06/29/2007 - World of Warcraft - 34 Replies
Today is a big day in the history of WoWSharp, most of it bad, some of it good.
In the past 9 months since development started, WoWSharp has been a milestone in WoW-bot development. First starting out with WoWRadar and WoWFisher, then other utilities like WoWBot, SharpSeer, WoWPartyBot, where created.
Everyone knows that since about a bit over a month, Blizzard has been using the WardenClient to detect 3rd party utilities. This WardenClient has put the World of Warcraft hacking on its...
|
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 14:38.
|
|
![[OpenSource Project] C++ CoCore](https://www.elitepvpers.com/forum/iconimages/co2-private-server/opensource-project-c-cocore_ltr.gif){kind=small}
