If you have sbot, definitly mbot doesnt worht for 5euro. Sbot is much better and bugfree compared to mbot. If you dont have an sbot acc, you may think but i still strongly suggest to buy sbot acc from someone.
As a hardcore botuser, i'm %100 sure mbot needs more time and it was wrong decision to end free and make it paid.
It only has few things that may overwhelm sbot :
- Works on tomb, temple (but if you zerk on tomb, bot crashes lol).
- You can use walkscirpt in tomb/temple. I have made semi-auto quest script with this for temple, with help of autoit ofc.
- Mastery upper, i duno if any1 used this but its causing dc problems sometimes.
- If you have few buffs at bufflist which are dependent to other buffs AND incase you cant buff the dependent buff, bot still buffs others.
Etc: You have dance of wizardy + mana tambour in buff list. Say, other bard in pt failed to buff guard tambour. So you cant buff wizardy ofc. On sbot, bot constantly tries to cast wizardy and cancel mana tambour. On mbot, if you are unable to cast wizardy, bot still casts mana tambour, and if the guard tambour becomes avaible from the other bard, then casts wizardy and all works fine.
-Heal pt members using xxxx skill if HP is lower than xx. I use this with cleric in pt, with holy recovery or healing cycle skills, so if somehow warior or any other char is in trouble it saves their a$$.
All other things of sbot is superior to mbot. So its a bit mistake to make paid for immature bot imo.
Shiva on sbot, definitly says there will be no clientless, tomb/temple and autoquest support in future.
So any stable bot that will integrate auto quest will deserve some $$$ since lots of players are willing to pay for it.
Edit : And it is so easy to make autoquest option for mbot as in ibot, since it doesnt need much coding, once you get quest completed info, it will just run script, as in ibot. I just dont understand that how a bot creator tries to control legitimaty of game(conscience?? ), even joymax didint care for years.