Future CoD Titles Requiring TPM & Secure Boot

Looking like Activision following the footsteps of Battlefield 6 with Requiring Mandatory TPM2.0 & Secure Boot

https://support.activision.com/articles/trusted-platform-module-and-secure-boot

Quote:

Originally Posted by tuffy09 Looking like Activision following the footsteps of Battlefield 6 with Requiring Mandatory TPM2.0 & Secure Boot https://support.activision.com/articles/trusted-platform-module-and-secure-boot

LOL RIP to all externals & internals soon. :wat:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadyss LOL RIP to all externals & internals soon. :wat:

no ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadyss LOL RIP to all externals & internals soon. :wat:

fr no bro haha

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadyss LOL RIP to all externals & internals soon. :wat:

how is that going to stop externals and internals lmao?

cheats that require secureboot off can spoof it so it thinks its on, like fecurity already can do...

TPM is really just for them to have another thing to use to identify you, which again i think a lot of spoofers now can spoof ur tpm...

there are some require secure boot off tho

Quote:

Originally Posted by e22014471 there are some require secure boot off tho

only ones that require secureboot to be disabled are ones like fecurity, ring-1 for example that load on boot
because secureboot verifies efis that get loaded on boot and wont boot unless all efis being loaded are verified as legit.

these cheats can make windows think secureboot is enabled though once they have been loaded, even if its not. Making the secureboot check pointless.

if the cheat does not load on boot, i cant think of any reason for them to need to have secureboot disabled.

No all Externals and Internals RIP :kappa:
Anticheat too good

Can we believe in that ricoshit?

Just wait news of dev.

Cadyss was trolling, its not going to cause a problem for anyone.

Almost all modern cheats work with secure boot and TPM on, SS does, im sure basically every provider you've heard of does.

Guess that’s why Cadyss sent a kappa (: and ss already said everything about it…so keep calm ��

very skilled devs can work around this....

for DMA users... as long as your firmware allows you to have secure boot and TPM2.0 enabled then you're fine

Quote:

Originally Posted by timwithxim very skilled devs can work around this.... for DMA users... as long as your firmware allows you to have secure boot and TPM2.0 enabled then you're fine

Even for non-DMA theres already ways to bypass TPM and secure boot requirements

Quote:

Originally Posted by kvassxd Even for non-DMA theres already ways to bypass TPM and secure boot requirements

i literally just said that... "very skilled devs can work around this..." u just worded it differently