I have questions about DMA cheats

02/09/2025 06:29 Moontic#1
1. I want to use DMA but only secure memory read-only features. I want to use the visChams feature, but I've seen several threads mention that this feature is risky. Isn't it really safe?

2. I want to order DMA card and FW from duck-service, can I use all of Lone, Clutch, and Atomic with that firmware?

3. Does Atomic have a recently released feature video? Other cheats have videos on Discord or site, but I don't think Atomic is the only one.
02/09/2025 06:36 LoneSurvivor88#2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moontic View Post
1. I want to use DMA but only secure memory read-only features. I want to use the visChams feature, but I've seen several threads mention that this feature is risky. Isn't it really safe?

2. I want to order DMA card and FW from duck-service, can I use all of Lone, Clutch, and Atomic with that firmware?

3. Does Atomic have a recently released feature video? Other cheats have videos on Discord or site, but I don't think Atomic is the only one.
1. Vischeck chams seems to be pretty safe, I haven't seen any evidence that it has been detected and several DMA Cheats have it.

2. Yes
02/09/2025 08:24 Moontic#3
Quote:
Originally Posted by LoneSurvivor88 View Post
1. Vischeck chams seems to be pretty safe, I haven't seen any evidence that it has been detected and several DMA Cheats have it.

2. Yes
thanks for answer

What about the aim-bot(use kmbox) or writing feature(to mem)? Have user ever had a manual ban? Or not, but do you predict it to be dangerous?
02/09/2025 14:33 koxa00#4
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moontic View Post
thanks for answer

What about the aim-bot(use kmbox) or writing feature(to mem)? Have user ever had a manual ban? Or not, but do you predict it to be dangerous?
you dont need a kmbox for any of the dma providers for aimbot to work
02/09/2025 15:17 Moontic#5
Quote:
Originally Posted by koxa00 View Post
you dont need a kmbox for any of the dma providers for aimbot to work
Are you saying that all EFT cheats currently don't have an aim-bot feature using KMBOX?
02/09/2025 17:02 Galaxy7#6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moontic View Post
Are you saying that all EFT cheats currently don't have an aim-bot feature using KMBOX?
All DMA cheats offer memory writing aimbot since it's not risky at all.
Lones doesn't have KMBOX, but I think Atomic might.
02/10/2025 11:15 Moontic#7
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galaxy7 View Post
All DMA cheats offer memory writing aimbot since it's not risky at all.
Lones doesn't have KMBOX, but I think Atomic might.
In EFT, I've seen a post saying that we don't need to use KMBOX because aim-bot is completely safe. Nevertheless, I'm cautious because it's memory writing after all.
02/10/2025 15:17 LoneSurvivor88#8
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moontic View Post
In EFT, I've seen a post saying that we don't need to use KMBOX because aim-bot is completely safe. Nevertheless, I'm cautious because it's memory writing after all.
Memory writing is much lighter risk in eft. Most games you’d get banned, but there’s many dozens of features you can write mem in eft and they are safe at the moment.
02/10/2025 19:04 witchnametaken#9
BSG is bad when it comes to DMA. Lots of free/cheap options on firmware.

Also, I see no risk buying from a random Discord owner than a China (high rep reseller) website. A lot cheaper, got my DMA & Fuser for $120 total - 14 days to receive.
02/10/2025 19:51 Egal#10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moontic View Post
In EFT, I've seen a post saying that we don't need to use KMBOX because aim-bot is completely safe. Nevertheless, I'm cautious because it's memory writing after all.
If youre already using chams, might as well use aimbot too. Getting a kmbox solely for tarkov is a waste of money. As has already been stated above, most eft cheats dont even support it anyways.

If you end up getting one you should also buy a fuser for esp so you can eliminate memory writes entirely
02/12/2025 04:10 Moontic#11
Quote:
Originally Posted by LoneSurvivor88 View Post
Memory writing is much lighter risk in eft. Most games you’d get banned, but there’s many dozens of features you can write mem in eft and they are safe at the moment.
What's the difference between Writing memory via DMA cheat(using aim-bot) and internal cheat's cham without DMA? Don't both have the same risk in the same context of memory writing?

I only used CHAM ESP during this ban wave and got ban. Please let me know if there's anything I don't know
02/14/2025 04:27 Iprey06#12
Unlikely you received a ban for chams or esp.
02/14/2025 17:11 LoneSurvivor88#13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iprey06 View Post
Unlikely you received a ban for chams or esp.
Yeah ESP is readonly, and we haven't seen any evidence that Chams (when implemented properly) has caused bans for any players.
02/14/2025 18:54 Moontic#14
Quote:
Originally Posted by LoneSurvivor88 View Post
Yeah ESP is readonly, and we haven't seen any evidence that Chams (when implemented properly) has caused bans for any players.
I think the reply I wrote caused a misunderstanding I did not use ESP CHAMS from DMA, I used ESP CHAMS from internal cheat.

I thought the risk was the same in that both internal cheat's chams and DMA's aimbot (point: both also write on memory)

But when I looked it up, I realized that DMA is much safer even if they write the same on memory.
02/14/2025 19:09 vm-#15
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moontic View Post
I think the reply I wrote caused a misunderstanding I did not use ESP CHAMS from DMA, I used ESP CHAMS from internal cheat.

I thought the risk was the same in that both internal cheat's chams and DMA's aimbot (point: both also write on memory)

But when I looked it up, I realized that DMA is much safer even if they write the same on memory.
Writing memory poses the same risk across both internal and dma cheats.

The difference comes on the detection side of things. Both DMA and internal cheats pose a risk of being detected which would result in a ban. For external / internal cheats the detection comes from the 'bypass' side of things and for DMA it comes from the firmware. The frequency of detections depends on several factors for both so there is no real argument as to which is "more undetected". (I know people might disagree with me here so just take it as my opinion)
In terms of features, both can result in bans but usually DMA has a lot less features or read only features which would definitely decrease this risk factor. Usually they are just ESP, Radar and potentially aimbot. If you have spent all the money to buy a DMA and run it on a 2nd pc and buy a cheat with risky or exploiting features then you are defeating the entire purpose of it which is to keep your account. And if this is what you are looking to do then an internal cheat would definitely serve the better purpose and give a more enjoyable experience overall.