Valorant Console Triggerbot Question

Anybody ever tried to use a capture card + console to create a triggerbot for console?

Quote:

Originally Posted by LostAndConfusedHaha Anybody ever tried to use a capture card + console to create a triggerbot for console?

yup ours works on console as long as you have a xim matrix.

Quote:

Originally Posted by LostAndConfusedHaha Anybody ever tried to use a capture card + console to create a triggerbot for console?

If you don’t want to use a capture card with a lot of delay, you could try using an LDAT instead. I’m not a console player, but is it possible to display the same image on two screens? If so, you should be fine with an LDAT.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberCzar If you don’t want to use a capture card with a lot of delay, you could try using an LDAT instead. I’m not a console player, but is it possible to display the same image on two screens? If so, you should be fine with an LDAT.

LDAT is for latency testing no?

Quote:

Originally Posted by .MOON. LDAT is for latency testing no?

Yes, but it should be possible to modify it for those kinds of use cases.


However, it will be hard to get hold of, and I’m not sure about the price. Technically, though, such a solution should be possible and feasible with moderate effort.

Yes, but it should be possible to modify it for those kinds of use cases.

However, it will be hard to get hold of, and I’m not sure about the price. Technically, though, such a solution should be possible and feasible with moderate effort.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberCzar Yes, but it should be possible to modify it for those kinds of use cases. However, it will be hard to get hold of, and I’m not sure about the price. Technically, though, such a solution should be possible and feasible with moderate effort.

LDAT (Latency Display Analysis Tool) is primarily designed to measure system latency and display response time, not to capture video data; it uses a luminance sensor to detect changes in screen brightness to calculate latency, making it unsuitable for recording video footage directly.

Are we thinking of different things?

Quote:

Originally Posted by .MOON. LDAT (Latency Display Analysis Tool) is primarily designed to measure system latency and display response time, not to capture video data; it uses a luminance sensor to detect changes in screen brightness to calculate latency, making it unsuitable for recording video footage directly. Are we thinking of different things?

Nobody said you had to record it, it's not technically necessar.

However, it is neither my motivation or my intention to create a guide specifically for you, especially because you may sell it.

I just wanted to explain a possibility that it is also possible to write a trigger bot using ldat.

Technically it should be possible, but as I said, it's hard to get your hands on.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberCzar Yes, but it should be possible to modify it for those kinds of use cases. However, it will be hard to get hold of, and I’m not sure about the price. Technically, though, such a solution should be possible and feasible with moderate effort.

Looks like you deleted a post:

"Nobody said you had to record it, it's not technically necessar.

However, it is neither my motivation or my intention to create a guide specifically for you, especially because you may sell it.

technically it should be possible, but as I said, it's not hard to get your hands on."

AKA you have no clue what you are talking about XD.

Quote:

Originally Posted by .MOON. Looks like you deleted a post: "Nobody said you had to record it, it's not technically necessar. However, it is neither my motivation or my intention to create a guide specifically for you, especially because you may sell it. technically it should be possible, but as I said, it's not hard to get your hands on." AKA you have no clue what you are talking about XD.

"Looks like you deleted a post" ... Nope, I changed the text 3-4 times, and then it was deleted. I don’t know the reason for that.



technically it should be possible, but as I said, it's "not" hard to get your hands on."


AKA you have no clue what you are talking about XD .... Okay so you have no clue how this should work ? :rtfm:



The real question is how it compares to other solutions in terms of price. It's true that there are technically better and more elegant solutions, and it’s also correct that you can use it to create a triggerbot. You seem to think you’re the top programmer with your dual PC Moonlight setup, but honestly, no regular player uses Moonlight. So, it's already kind of a red flag. I use it too, to be fair, but it’s a risk I’m currently willing to take.

A better solution would be setting up a local server and using OBS. OBS is much more widely used and generally better suited than Moonlight, especially when you consider how often OBS and Moonlight are used in comparison.

Do you actually know any players who use Moonlight as a service to play Valorant? It’s an absolute minority, if not practically nonexistent. It’s true that you don’t get banned for it currently, but it’s not necessarily safe either, especially since we don’t know if or when it will be patched. Just this year, we got a patch that partially blocked all those AHK triggerbots.

Quote:

Originally Posted by .MOON. yup ours works on console as long as you have a xim matrix.

I added you in discord, I’m interested.