B06 beta controller support

Any providers with native controller support for the beta?

EngineOwning

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jgjohn Any providers with native controller support for the beta?

Synthetic Skill requires the remap of 1 key, but you use native input in game so there is no input delay.

[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Quote:

Originally Posted by SyntheticSkill Synthetic Skill requires the remap of 1 key, but you use native input in game so there is no input delay. [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

When I click on the link to go to the site it pops up a error everytime

Quote:

Originally Posted by DennisMeister69 EngineOwning

Quote:

Originally Posted by DennisMeister69 EngineOwning

EO has multiple detections. LOL...
Imagning using EO in 2024.

I would use PhantomOverlay. They added controller support.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jgjohn When I click on the link to go to the site it pops up a error everytime How do I get to the website it s a error everytime I try to go to it

I believe your ISP blocks their domain (.su) domain. You could either change your DNS to Cloudflare or use a vpn.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DennisMeister69 EngineOwning

How do I get to the site? It says it's down

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nakanak EO has multiple detections. LOL... Imagning using EO in 2024. I would use PhantomOverlay. They added controller support.

Ok troll, like the fact you have been clowned in an other thread about AA, AA is OG with a single detection of 3 years and u claim shit like multiple detections and private only, which is untrue. If i had to be honest PO also had two detections, in MW3 beta and in april.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DennisMeister69 Ok troll, like the fact you have been clowned in an other thread about AA, AA is OG with a single detection of 3 years and u claim shit like multiple detections and private only, which is untrue. If i had to be honest PO also had two detections, in MW3 beta and in april.

EO has the most detections. The fact that you have no idea here alone shows that you are wrong in the other thread as well.
You are also spreading untruths. PO only had one detection.
For a chair that you get without ID verification or an invitation, that is very good.
EO is constantly detected 2-3 detections a year.
The person asking the question certainly does not want to get a permanent ban in the 3rd match. You are not helping the person asking the question by insulting and getting personal here.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nakanak EO has the most detections. The fact that you have no idea here alone shows that you are wrong in the other thread as well. You are also spreading untruths. PO only had one detection. For a chair that you get without ID verification or an invitation, that is very good. EO is constantly detected 2-3 detections a year. The person asking the question certainly does not want to get a permanent ban in the 3rd match. You are not helping the person asking the question by insulting and getting personal here.

Where did i claim that eo didn't got detected multiple times? And excuse me every year multiple? Single detection in 2023 though... You must forget how big EO is and how big Activision is obsessed with them, especially after failing the lawsuit and endless of trollings.


PO one detection?
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
(27 september during MW3 beta as well as i said, those users has been banned also)

[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Okay i get it 'mostly' but a detection is a detection.


This time I'm not even defending EO or anything, I'm a long time customer of them but I just love the fact you recommend providers with also multiple detections, or recommending externals which make nothing much safer, it all depends on the developer, when there are providers like AA or systemcheats with like 1 detection or none(systemcheats).

EO just got detected today btw

Quote:

Originally Posted by DennisMeister69 Okay i get it 'mostly' but a detection is a detection.

Saying po got 2 detections is far fetched, less than 50 people were banned in april, you realise how little that is??? They could've just denied it and blamed customers for raging (like other providers would've done)

If we count all EO detections that "don't affect most users" then EO has had like 5 detections this year alone.. So u dont wanna go down that road...

Also stop saying "they" when u refer to EO as u are clearly part of their team, all your posts here are defending them

Quote:

Originally Posted by slippin_jimmy Saying po got 2 detections is far fetched, less than 50 people were banned in april, you realise how little that is??? They could've just denied it and blamed customers for raging (like other providers would've done) If we count all EO detections that "don't affect most users" then EO has had like 5 detections this year alone.. So u dont wanna go down that road... Also stop saying "they" when u refer to EO as u are clearly part of their team, all your posts here are defending them

A detection is a detection, also you count EO's detections along with a separate product, the spoofer xddd

Yes i'm definitely someone unprofessional from EO team, yeah definitely from EO... My previous posts are not only from EO, but yes it is mainly cuz i'm a customer, obvious isn't it?

Quote:

Originally Posted by DennisMeister69 A detection is a detection, also you count EO's detections along with a separate product, the spoofer xddd

okay so even if only 10 people end up getting banned due to the detection you announced about yesterday i will keep telling people that EO was last detected in september 2024, no additional context. A bit misleading maybe but its fine u want it this way

Quote:

Originally Posted by slippin_jimmy okay so even if only 10 people end up getting banned due to the detection you announced about yesterday i will keep telling people that EO was last detected in september 2024, no additional context. A bit misleading maybe but its fine u want it this way

Maybe you did not understood my message, A detection is a detection, you'd like me to repeat?