Safest hack atm

Hello, I am looking for the safest hack at the moment for Warzone. Just want to play legit. Don’t care of the price. Thank you guys :)

Phantom Overlay

IW / PO / AA

Check out Unnamed

Quote:

Originally Posted by azerty1337 Hello, I am looking for the safest hack at the moment for Warzone. Just want to play legit. Don’t care of the price. Thank you guys :)

All COD cheats been DT at least once, besides Proofcore. Its the last standing Cheat without an detection in any Cod title. (Require ID verification)

For public ones Artificial Aiming is the current longest UD provider, UD since April 2021.

So Artificial Aiming, Interwebz and Phantomoverlay are your best bet if you dont wanna use Proofcore.

ProofCore is the safest cheat right now. It has not had any type of detection. Phantom Overlay was detected at MW2 end/MW3 beta, so very recently.

I can verify what the above two posters said, proofcore has never been detected on a COD game and we're also not completely public, so you can be rest assured you would be using cheats that not everybody has access to. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions.

Phantom Overlay is your best option if you don't want to give your ID to the provider & pay elevated price. PO also has better performance & options (while still being safe) than some of the private COD options from what I've heard. All while still having a very comparable detection record (or even better in some cases)

If you are OK with paying more & giving ID then proofcore still hasn't been targeted by Ricochet. They have had criticisms surrounding laggy ESP/lacking features but the fact they've never been hit on COD once speaks for itself. The restricted access has clearly kept them off of Ricochet's radar. That could always change & they certainly could hire a third party to gain them access, but even with proofcore's recent surge in popularity for COD, the Ricochet team has bigger targets to worry about for now

There are also other providers who have avoided cheat detections for long periods but I also recommend you look into if they've had feature detections. Bans are bans. Also if they force you to use a spoofer ask about their spoofer history. Again, bans are bans

Quote:

Originally Posted by Celusios Phantom Overlay was detected at MW2 end/MW3 beta, so very recently

Some of the recent examples of detection are the providers who outlasted many others for a long while & plan to do it again. Of course I am speaking about popular public providers here. I understand you recommended PC who's never been hit

Quote:

Originally Posted by azerty1337 Hello, I am looking for the safest hack at the moment for Warzone. Just want to play legit. Don’t care of the price. Thank you guys :)

I use Phantom Overlay and would recommend anyone to use it. Great cheat with a lot of new security features to stay ahead of ricochet. Zebleer very up front and helpful to his customers. Trust his product. I'm also a 2x lifetime member.

Quote:

Originally Posted by zebleer Some of the recent examples of detection are the providers who outlasted many others for a long while & plan to do it again. Of course I am speaking about popular public providers here. I understand you recommended PC who's never been hit

But how does a provider who's been hit come before a provider who not only hasn't been hit but has a great detection history on games with a more aggressive anti-cheat?

I think PO is the better selection if you want more quality of life features (like being able to save/import settings) and more customization/less lag/etc. but if someone wants purely safety and is OK with a very minimal somewhat laggy external cheat, it's PC.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Celusios But how does a provider who's been hit come before a provider who not only hasn't been hit but has a great detection history on games with a more aggressive anti-cheat? I think PO is the better selection if you want more quality of life features (like being able to save/import settings) and more customization/less lag/etc. but if someone wants purely safety and is OK with a very minimal somewhat laggy external cheat, it's PC.

I was replying to you assigning meaning to "recent" in terms of the PO DT and reminding you that the more recent DTs in terms of the providers who have been hit = some of the ones who lasted the longest

That was all I meant by my reply

In terms of how I match up against PC, we will have to see now that their name is getting more popular for COD

Quote:

Originally Posted by zebleer I was replying to you assigning meaning to "recent" in terms of the PO DT and reminding you that the more recent DTs in terms of the providers who have been hit = some of the ones who lasted the longest That was all I meant by my reply In terms of how I match up against PC, we will have to see now that their name is getting more popular for COD

I understand, my bad for misunderstanding then. That's a fair statement, but I agree as you said we'll see how things stack up as they'll naturally see more usage give they're (and AA?) are the only undetected ones around, historically.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Celusios I understand, my bad for misunderstanding then. That's a fair statement, but I agree as you said we'll see how things stack up as they'll naturally see more usage give they're (and AA?) are the only undetected ones around, historically.

As far as I know, AA's unlock all and spoofer both got hit during MW2

I understand those aren't cheat detections but bans are bans. From the perspective of Ricochet & their limited resources, they probably just wanted to cause as many of AA's users to get banned as they reasonably could during MW2 & then move on. Maybe it was too hard for them to go for a cheat detection so they just did what they could & went off to another target

The same goes for proofcore. I am sure Ricochet is aware of proofcore but from their perspective or the perspective of any executive they answer to, proofcore is just that "provider that is expensive and requires ID so we can worry about them later... probably doesn't have a lot of users." That could always change later but for now I think that's how they see it

I'm hoping AA and proofcore stay UD cheat wise of course. I always root for the cheaters over the anti-cheat even if it's my competitors (unless it's unnamedtech)

& I do think it's cool that AA hasn't had an actual cheat detection since 2021

Quote:

Originally Posted by zebleer As far as I know, AA's unlock all and spoofer both got hit during MW2 I understand those aren't cheat detections but bans are bans. From the perspective of Ricochet & their limited resources, they probably just wanted to cause as many of AA's users to get banned as they reasonably could during MW2 & then move on. Maybe it was too hard for them to go for a cheat detection so they just did what they could & went off to another target The same goes for proofcore. I am sure Ricochet is aware of proofcore but from their perspective or the perspective of any executive they answer to, proofcore is just that "provider that is expensive and requires ID so we can worry about them later... probably doesn't have a lot of users." That could always change later but for now I think that's how they see it I'm hoping AA and proofcore stay UD cheat wise of course. I always root for the cheaters over the anti-cheat even if it's my competitors (unless it's unnamedtech) & I do think it's cool that AA hasn't had an actual cheat detection since 2021

Well said, I appreciate the transparency. I'm no fool and know that ProofCore will probably have its day of detection too, at some point every provider will. However, I don't even think people should be worried about detections these days as much as they should Ricochets stat based bullshit going on with shadowbans, that'd be my concern.

If you don't mind I.D Verification proofcore has the best detection rate on cod and battleye games.