LS vs BGX (electric boogaloo)

\\\

LS is the best public script overall imo and I've been scripting since 2014. No one here will suggest any privates because they are private sadly, you have to get invited or get in contact with the right people. BGX is detected and also needs a bypass which will be a lot more expensive than LS and LS is actually sort of UD and they got a bypass. I haven't been banned yet with LS and I've used it for many months.

I'd recommend LS over BGX^

Quote:

Originally Posted by haugrud1978 LS is the best public script overall imo and I've been scripting since 2014. No one here will suggest any privates because they are private sadly, you have to get invited or get in contact with the right people. BGX is detected and also needs a bypass which will be a lot more expensive than LS and LS is actually sort of UD and they got a bypass. I haven't been banned yet with LS and I've used it for many months.

Isn't bgx UD atm?

Quote:

Originally Posted by seicof666 Isn't bgx UD atm?

No. It was many months ago when it wasn’t public

where I can buy LS?

Quote:

Originally Posted by haugrud1978 LS is the best public script overall imo and I've been scripting since 2014. No one here will suggest any privates because they are private sadly, you have to get invited or get in contact with the right people. BGX is detected and also needs a bypass which will be a lot more expensive than LS and LS is actually sort of UD and they got a bypass. I haven't been banned yet with LS and I've used it for many months.

Quote:

Originally Posted by akamebtw where I can buy LS?

You may find our website link in my signature.

Is LS really that much better than BGX? I've used both and I cannot say LS was any better than BGX... Other than it's much simpler to config, of course. But on the other side the BGX loader makes it much easier to use.

Quote:

Originally Posted by frankyboie Is LS really that much better than BGX? I've used both and I cannot say LS was any better than BGX... Other than it's much simpler to config, of course. But on the other side the BGX loader makes it much easier to use.

Seeing as BGX just got detected, yea probably a little better then BGX

Quote:

Originally Posted by ilikebacon Seeing as BGX just got detected, yea probably a little better then BGX

wdym? last detection was like 3 months ago

Quote:

Originally Posted by nykoPI wdym? last detection was like 3 months ago

Idk I heard it just got hit?

Quote:

Originally Posted by frankyboie Is LS really that much better than BGX? I've used both and I cannot say LS was any better than BGX... Other than it's much simpler to config, of course. But on the other side the BGX loader makes it much easier to use.

Yes, LS is really much better.
The only advantage of BGX vs LS is having more champion scripts.
BGX is still ok though and better than many platforms.

BGX is better, LS price doesn't justify!

I play one game with LS and next with BGX and the difference is minuscule for me. Both are fun to play with and perform well. I like to mess around with the countless settings in BGX, but with LS you get high quality script for each champ, no config needed and beautiful visuals. The quality of scripts are sometimes better on LS and sometimes better on BGX, but BGX usually have more sophisticated scripts and prediction IMO. And I really like the simplicity of the loader on BGX. Just load the game in DX11 mode and it auto injects perfectly every time. On LS it's a hassle and does not reflect the price at all.

I play with both and BGX is way more worth my money than LS due to the small differences but huge price jump, and I don't mind needing to configure each champ to my liking.

Quote:

Seeing as BGX just got detected, yea probably a little better then BGX

Huh? As I said I've been playing with both on several accounts, going obvious and getting called out. No bans.

Alright
To get this thread closed up, I'll say my opinion on this matter after trying LS for a week.

First of all, the loader.
Super simplistic, not really something I'd expect from a 100$ league script, but it doesn't really matter for me since I'm used to very basic cmd stuff from my friends. I'd give it a 6/10

SDK
Very different from BGX, afaik only LUA devs are able to create their own scripts in LS. Me as a basic user, I don't really mind it, but I get it from the standpoint of a module dev that they wouldn't really like the script because C++ isn't available.
?/10

First impressions
Very easy to configure, pretty much start a game and play, no editing needed. The "modules" (idk what else to call 'em) are pretty basic on some champs, but it still does pretty well. I love the orbwalker RGB drawings, I like the support of user-made lua scripts even tho that's possible in BGX aswell. Doesn't have DX11 support, so that's a point down for me.
8/10

Orbwalker
To be fair, it felt very average for me, I've used BGX for a long time, been there when auroraorb first came out which was (and still is, even tho its outdated) imo the best orbwalker in the scripting scene at this point. It for sure does the job.
7/10

Prediction
Super decent, for example on some champs you need to use the new pred, on some you need to use the old pred. It hits fairly well and since the last time I've used aurorapred was about a month ago (don't really know how well it's doing atm), I can't really compare it to it, but if i compare it to that a month ago, it felt like BGX pred hit better on ezreal, but on LS it hit better on xerath etc, just very hit or miss.
8/10

Evade
Super customizable, very well done, that's why it's called the best Evade on the public market.
9.5/10

Awareness
I love it, it's super clean and doesn't really take up much of my FPS.
9/10

Don't really know what else to say. If you wanna buy LS and have the money for it, go for it, but imo, it really isn't worth 5x the price of a BGX month sub.