Patch 5223. 91GameCheck.exe

new file in the patch can anyone tell what it does exactly?

Quote:

Originally Posted by EliteElite new file in the patch can anyone tell what it does exactly?

wtf are you on about I don't see a gameguard in my conquer folder after patching -_-'

conquer 2.0\IsecPlus\91GameCheck.exe

the patch not out yet .... so he wont know ...

Out now

So conquer is finally using a gameguard?

im guessing it an anti proxy thing, sheerly on the basis the folder is called ipsec, and ipsec = microsoft ip blocking tool. i could be entirely wrong tho

Thats Shit cuz they can get ownd by police .. cuz this "gameguard" is ilegal cuz it's check your process list ....

Quote:

Originally Posted by apocalipticdemon Thats Shit cuz they can get ownd by police .. cuz this "gameguard" is ilegal cuz it's check your process list ....

GameGuard don't do a fuck against hacking (just look rakion, more than 50 pct there hack and they use gameguard -.-)

What they do is not illegal because you, player of conquer, accepted their Terms of Service. And they made it possible for them self.

Except they can't make changes to their TOS then punish you for not conforming to it, without making you "re-agree" to it. Entirely illegal, it's why companies like Apple, make you agree to their terms whenever you update your version of iTunes, or go to buy something from the Apple Store, and there is a new ToS.

If there was a pop-up when the client started making you agree to it, its a different matter.

I'm no expert when it comes to law, but I believe thats the case, as for what they are doing, it may still be illegal no matter if they make a ToS, some stipulations in a ToS are null, because of the nature of them, i don't know whether this would class as an invalid term, someone with law experience may know.

it's their own-made gameguard..

Quote:

Originally Posted by p s y k h d it's their own-made gameguard..

more like failguard

Quote:

Originally Posted by ~Falcon Except they can't make changes to their TOS then punish you for not conforming to it, without making you "re-agree" to it. Entirely illegal, it's why companies like Apple, make you agree to their terms whenever you update your version of iTunes, or go to buy something from the Apple Store, and there is a new ToS. If there was a pop-up when the client started making you agree to it, its a different matter. I'm no expert when it comes to law, but I believe thats the case, as for what they are doing, it may still be illegal no matter if they make a ToS, some stipulations in a ToS are null, because of the nature of them, i don't know whether this would class as an invalid term, someone with law experience may know.

If you ever read the [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] it say at point (1) (B)

Quote:

The Company may amend, update, modify or correct this Agreement, or modify the Rules of Conduct at any time in its sole discretion without any obligation to inform the User of the amendment or changes by posting the amended Agreement or modified Rules of Conduct at [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]. Amendments or changes to the Agreement will be effective immediately after the amended Agreement is posted. Modifications to the Rules of Conduct will be effective immediately upon posting. Your use of TQ Games after the effective date of any amendments to this Agreement constitutes your agreement to the amendments. You agree to check this Agreement and the Rules of Conduct periodically so you will be familiar with their content as amended or modified from time to time.

Open your eyes and read it,,
Also do this next time BEFORE replying..

Now back to the main-subject

Quote:

Originally Posted by high9 more like failguard

You're right! Didn't detect any Bot, Autoclicker or other stuff yet.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jackpotsvr You're right! Didn't detect any Bot, Autoclicker or other stuff yet.

Because it hasn't been activated yet

Quote:

Originally Posted by jackpotsvr Also do this next time BEFORE replying..

Edit: I'm not even going to bother, getting into an argument.