Selling Maplestory Bind Exploit Service (GMS)

Bump, Still Offering c:

Quote:

Originally Posted by supermarioz5 Damn, the Global Maple scene has come to re-selling stuffs that's already public for outrageous prices? Hahaha. Someone's gonna have to shake things up soon..

Not really reselling :thinking: Just offering a service like nobody could offer, not outrageous either if you don't like the pricing then please purchase the service from another individual who'll gladly offer it to you. You can also feel free to do it yourself :), I politely ask you to go ahead and do so. If there was actual people with stuff then I wouldn't sell or even think about offering this considering my previous reputation on GK.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrunchyRainbow Why have people round up money for a dedi? Sounds unnecessary when you can simply login to their accounts :thinking:

Because I don't have a proxy system setup nor do I spoof hwid. I'd rather not risk my account by linking myself to multiple people.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sensible7 If a group of people wanted to rally up and donate $ for a dedi, I would gladly offer this service to anybody who wanted it. Even though I personally use this exploit, I don't think something that was released publicly for multiple years should be profited off of when it wasn't their exploit to begin with. Same goes with rps for fame.

If the ability to perform this exploit was as widely available as it was in the past, I’m sure this wouldn’t be being sold for 2 reasons.
1. It’s not Ally’s work (they’re not claiming that it is btw)
2. It would be publicly available, why would anyone buy it if it were public and easily done?

Don’t get me wrong, if you have the means to do this, I’d love to see you do it but post proof before accepting any donations. I thought this died with terminal until this thread.

Quote:

Originally Posted by xLyfted If the ability to perform this exploit was as widely available as it was in the past, I’m sure this wouldn’t be being sold for 2 reasons. 1. It’s not Ally’s work (they’re not claiming that it is btw) 2. It would be publicly available, why would anyone buy it if it were public and easily done? Don’t get me wrong, if you have the means to do this, I’d love to see you do it but post proof before accepting any donations. I thought this died with terminal until this thread.

I'm not saying she's claiming it as her work, but in my opinion it's a scummy thing to do.
0x0210 is the header for this patch which she can confirm as proof.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sensible7 Because I don't have a proxy system setup nor do I spoof hwid. I'd rather not risk my account by linking myself to multiple people.

Don't get me wrong more the merry if someone can offer it but some issues.
1. You should've made a separate thread
2. You should've read my previous post on this thread not that long ago
3. You should show some credible proof of performing this in 2022 if you're going to be asking for money from people.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sensible7 I'm not saying she's claiming it as her work, but in my opinion it's a scummy thing to do. 0x0210 is the header for this patch which she can confirm as proof.

That is not the correct header.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrunchyRainbow Don't get me wrong more the merry if someone can offer it but some issues. 1. You should've made a separate thread 2. You should've read my previous post on this thread not that long ago 3. You should show some credible proof of performing this in 2022 if you're going to be asking for money from people. That is not the correct header.

That is the correct header lol.
10 02 [timestamp] [skill id 4 bytes]
Keyboard assignment is 0x01DB as well.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sensible7 That is the correct header lol. 10 02 [timestamp] [skill id 4 bytes]

That is not the correct header lol. Its close but not correct.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrunchyRainbow That is not the correct header lol. Its close but not correct.

It is though.
Go send it and look at 0x61 recv.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sensible7 It is though. Go send it and look at 0x61 recv.

0x20D Send
0x67 Recv

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrunchyRainbow 0x20D Send 0x67 Recv

Oh you're right, recv is 0x67.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sensible7 Oh you're right, recv is 0x67. [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Why were your headers wrong

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrunchyRainbow Why were your headers wrong

The recv was just off the top of my head so that was my fault.
0x210 works fine for me.



There's an example of 1 of kanna's hyper skills.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sensible7 The recv was just off the top of my head so that was my fault. 0x210 works fine for me. [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] There's an example of 1 of kanna's hyper skills.

Your packet logger looks very very very familiar. If you want to be more convincing btw you should do hypers on a Lara or Kain as those are new classes unlike kanna. Also I'll still be selling the service, feel free to offer it too but I prioritize user safety with using a different proxy and hwid being spoofed as I don't want all my customers mass banned.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrunchyRainbow Your packet logger looks very very very familiar. If you want to be more convincing btw you should do hypers on a Lara or Kain as those are new classes unlike kanna. Also I'll still be selling the service, feel free to offer it too but I prioritize user safety with using a different proxy and hwid being spoofed as I don't want all my customers mass banned.

I have no reason to lie.
To each their own I suppose.