OpenCV python got update EXANE

11/21/2018 16:09 ByHnDTr#1
opencv got update and its %30 more efficient on image scaning which means it could help about background pixel bot like exobot. EXANE PLEASE UPDATE!!!
11/21/2018 16:28 PNTX#2
that was not the reason he stopped. but u could have pmd him. or something else instead of creating this thread.
11/21/2018 17:45 exane^#3
Donate goal == 500€ :kappa:
11/21/2018 17:55 cron1003#4
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

soon :)
11/21/2018 17:58 ByHnDTr#5
Quote:
Originally Posted by exane^ View Post
Donate goal == 500€ :kappa:


you are my favourite :D:D:D:D

Quote:
Originally Posted by PNTX View Post
that was not the reason he stopped. but u could have pmd him. or something else instead of creating this thread.

there is lots of developers here i wanted let them see it to.
11/21/2018 20:53 ssamko#6
Thank you for interesting info...but OpenCV is still much slower than pure pixel/image search made by pixel comparison.
11/22/2018 10:01 Odang#7
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssamko View Post
Thank you for interesting info...but OpenCV is still much slower than pure pixel/image search made by pixel comparison.
What is the difference between openCV methode to compare pixel/images and "pure" pixel/image search(what do you mean with pure?)? Shouldnt they all use the same way of comparisom(template matching)?
11/22/2018 10:53 ssamko#8
Quote:
Originally Posted by Odang View Post
What is the difference between openCV methode to compare pixel/images and "pure" pixel/image search(what do you mean with pure?)? Shouldnt they all use the same way of comparisom(template matching)?
I have used openCV templateMatch in past (on CPU as well as GPU) and speed of finding object on full-hd pic was about 40-400ms (depends on maaany settings)...with simple ImageSearch which go 1 by 1 in pixel array (and comparing just simple pixel values) you can get match in 4-40ms.
The main difference there is in "match"..openCV has some more comlicated algorithms for that which take more time.

Here is explained OpenCV templateMatch: [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

PS: I havent work with OpenCV for about 2 years now...maybe some really significant improvements were made.
11/24/2018 03:53 ByHnDTr#9
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssamko View Post
I have used openCV templateMatch in past (on CPU as well as GPU) and speed of finding object on full-hd pic was about 40-400ms (depends on maaany settings)...with simple ImageSearch which go 1 by 1 in pixel array (and comparing just simple pixel values) you can get match in 4-40ms.
The main difference there is in "match"..openCV has some more comlicated algorithms for that which take more time.

Here is explained OpenCV templateMatch: [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

PS: I havent work with OpenCV for about 2 years now...maybe some really significant improvements were made.


This is an AWESOME diffrence. thank "you" for interesting that info :mofo::mofo::mofo: