Fortnite hack

Looking to buy a fortnite hack that is good close range I do use AMD processor and seems most hacks out there require intel. If you have something worth screensharing or showing me I am a long timer user of another hack out there and looking for something that is good close range and mid range I am a serious buyer and ready to buy so if you add me be ready to screenshare. Screenshots or old videos dont work on me.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trojankilla23 Looking to buy a fortnite hack that is good close range I do use AMD processor and seems most hacks out there require intel.

wtf kid, where did you hear that? there is no such thing as hack working on intel or amd only. Most fortnite hack coded in d3d or directx. You just have to worry if the hack will work on your OS system (if you still using old / different version like XP or NT).

Quote:

Originally Posted by BonaBona wtf kid, where did you hear that? there is no such thing as hack working on intel or amd only. Most fortnite hack coded in d3d or directx. You just have to worry if the hack will work on your OS system (if you still using old / different version like XP or NT).

I will just excuse your ignorance the current hacks on the market that I have seen that arent scams and if you can point me in the right direction instead of saying that it would be good but currently meme etc is intel only because it attaches to a driver I have had tons of resellers tell me this. I wouldn't just make this up

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trojankilla23 I will just excuse your ignorance the current hacks on the market that I have seen that arent scams and if you can point me in the right direction instead of saying that it would be good but currently meme etc is intel only because it attaches to a driver I have had tons of resellers tell me this. I wouldn't just make this up

I'm trying to educate you. Both intel and amd processor use directx API to handle 2d/3d rendering on windows app especially games. How the hell the hack works only for intel if the hack uses directx libraries to draw esp? Logic.

do you currently use a hack?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trojankilla23 do you currently use a hack?

Yes. i have master package with 86 hacks from artificialaiming and chams hack for fortnite: [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

All of them working on my AMD Ryzen7.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BonaBona I'm trying to educate you. Both intel and amd processor use directx API to handle 2d/3d rendering on windows app especially games. How the hell the hack works only for intel if the hack uses directx libraries to draw esp? Logic.

That is the most ignorant thing i've ever heard. While yes rendering does use directX the problem with CPU architectures is assembly. To bypass BE and EAC you will need to use assembly and usually create a driver. Assembly instructions vary per CPU and most will be coded for an intel CPU.

AMD and Intel processors(*) have a large set of instructions in common, so it is possible for a compiler or assembler to write binary code which runs "the same" on both.

However, different processor families even from one manufacturer have their own sets of instructions, usually referred to as "extensions" or whatever. Ignoring the x87 co-processor, the first time I remember this being a marketing point was when everything suddenly went "with MMX(TM) technology". Binary code expected to run on any processor either needs to avoid extensions, or to detect the CPU type before using them.

Intel's Itanium 64-bit architecture was completely different from AMD's x86-64 architecture, so for a while their 64bit offerings were non-compatible (and Itanium was nothing like x86, whereas x86-64 extended the instruction set by adding 64bit instructions). Intel blinked first and adopted x86-64, although there are still a few differences: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64#...4_and_Intel_64

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lulz2much That is the most ignorant thing i've ever heard. While yes rendering does use directX the problem with CPU architectures is assembly. To bypass BE and EAC you will need to use assembly and usually create a driver. Assembly instructions vary per CPU and most will be coded for an intel CPU. AMD and Intel processors(*) have a large set of instructions in common, so it is possible for a compiler or assembler to write binary code which runs "the same" on both. However, different processor families even from one manufacturer have their own sets of instructions, usually referred to as "extensions" or whatever. Ignoring the x87 co-processor, the first time I remember this being a marketing point was when everything suddenly went "with MMX(TM) technology". Binary code expected to run on any processor either needs to avoid extensions, or to detect the CPU type before using them. Intel's Itanium 64-bit architecture was completely different from AMD's x86-64 architecture, so for a while their 64bit offerings were non-compatible (and Itanium was nothing like x86, whereas x86-64 extended the instruction set by adding 64bit instructions). Intel blinked first and adopted x86-64, although there are still a few differences: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64#...4_and_Intel_64

Stop copy paste here, it makes you look stupid.

Hack only for intel? I dont trust you so fuck off.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BonaBona Stop copy paste here, it makes you look stupid. Hack only for intel? I dont trust you so fuck off.

You clearly don't know how to read, if you want to be uneducated feel free. Doesn't bother me. Have fun with 6IQ

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lulz2much You clearly don't know how to read, if you want to be uneducated feel free. Doesn't bother me. Have fun with 6IQ

You cant even explain it properly how the hack's bypass must specifically use driver from Intel <- stop here and explain this. Then you went off to long copy paste about chip architecture between Intel and AMD, seriously fuck off. Your IQ must be below average 68% because cant make good explanation.

I just wanna buy a hack lol and this guy comes in here not knowing anything about the market lol can a mod take this spammer outta here

Quote:

Originally Posted by BonaBona You cant even explain it properly how the hack's bypass must specifically use driver from Intel <- stop here and explain this. Then you went off to long copy paste about chip architecture between Intel and AMD, seriously fuck off. Your IQ must be below average 68% because cant make good explanation.

This guy lmao, I already told you, Intel has a different ASM instruction set compared to AMD, if one was coded specifically for Intel using those insruction sets it won't work for AMD, don't be an idiot.

Guys stop arguing over something insignificant, i wanna know too, is there a hack that is undetected and legit?

So far all I know is memer is undetected but they do exit scam strategy so not worth 300$ a month to know you may not get a month and a lot of devs with legit cheats have said EAC/be did an update so a lot of hacks are down until they find the new bypass or something not a coder thats all i know.

Mine has been undetected for three weeks which is honestly alot longer than expected. Anybody selling a monthly sub under $150/200 = scam or detected in 3 days, guaranteed.