How does Dyelite work?

01/22/2010 05:06 Theri#1
^^

There's no way it actually looks for the pixels in the color palette. The time it would take to screen search and find the pixels and then know where to click to have 2-3 of 5 choices be your color is too long. Is the color palette a set picture of which you then get to see just a small random section of? How does it know where will match what you want?

I've already coded my own script that can find all of X color to Y variation on the color palette and place a cursor at those pixels so you can see where they are but I want to make something like dyelite and what I have and what it does are pretty different.
01/23/2010 06:48 Theri#2
Bumping in case someone knows dyelite works on the inside. :p
01/23/2010 06:52 Kevsprk#3
RAWR DOUBLE POST NOT ALLOWED IMA FIRIN MAH INFRACTIONHAMMAH




jk :D Hmm, I was also wondering this.
01/23/2010 07:03 tbstewa#4
i think (remember i said think) it does actually go over the palette because one time i saw when i pressed pick color the X<-here thingamajig moved O_O but i think it goes say you are looking for a specific blue it scans the areas for blue then selects the best probability for that blue
01/23/2010 07:11 Theri#5
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevsprk View Post
RAWR DOUBLE POST NOT ALLOWED IMA FIRIN MAH INFRACTIONHAMMAH

jk :D Hmm, I was also wondering this.
I thought they were infractionlazers, pewpew!

Quote:
Originally Posted by tbstewa View Post
i think (remember i said think) it does actually go over the palette because one time i saw when i pressed pick color the X<-here thingamajig moved O_O but i think it goes say you are looking for a specific blue it scans the areas for blue then selects the best probability for that blue
I'm pretty sure it going to fast to actually be doing a pixel search. Even when I've gotten dyelite to work, which isnt often, it finds the match damn near instantly. There's 64,516 pixels in the color palette. So to find all pixels that match your hex within your % variation is time consuming and to then determine which ones are within a certain distance from each other to actually line up with the color picker?

I'm not sure but the color pickers 4 locations that aren't your mouse cursor seem to be random but I haven't really played with it enough to be sure.
01/23/2010 07:14 AKB990#6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Theri View Post
I thought they were infractionlazers, pewpew!



I'm pretty sure it going to fast to actually be doing a pixel search. Even when I've gotten dyelite to work, which isnt often, it finds the match damn near instantly. There's 64,516 pixels in the color palette. So to find all pixels that match your hex within your % variation is time consuming and to then determine which ones are within a certain distance from each other to actually line up with the color picker?

I'm not sure but the color pickers 4 locations that aren't your mouse cursor, seem to be random but I haven't really played with it enough to be sure.
It's a formula thing... note the Color Error %, Number of Selections ect.

It basically does the same thing the fossil restoration does, except it's Korean.
01/23/2010 07:15 tbstewa#7
i don't know but i know the image search is fairly fast and that's one thing i thought of... when it searches for gold it's fast click go and tadaa you know? i don't think it goes by exact pixel by pixel scan but more or less a general area scan then calculate probability.. i have NEVER gotten it to pick on the first try so idk but >,< maybe others can confirm?
01/23/2010 07:23 Theri#8
Quote:
Originally Posted by AKB990 View Post
It's a formula thing... note the Color Error %, Number of Selections ect.

It basically does the same thing the fossil restoration does, except it's Korean.
The only scan the fossil macro does is to see if a fossil is up and what kind it is. Thereafter its relative coordinate clicks.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tbstewa View Post
i don't know but i know the image search is fairly fast and that's one thing i thought of... when it searches for gold it's fast click go and tadaa you know? i don't think it goes by exact pixel by pixel scan but more or less a general area scan then calculate probability.. i have NEVER gotten it to pick on the first try so idk but >,< maybe others can confirm?
Right but imagesearch and pixelsearch are totally different. If you searched for the averaged rgb over an area you'd never be able to find what you want.
12/18/2011 09:48 Epvp_God#9
Does this still work?
12/18/2011 15:03 Alwaho#10
old thread is super old... stop
12/18/2011 19:09 Mew2K1ng#11
Your porn a porn addicted leecher. Mew2King2's hentai profile...... look no posts.
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]