2 Warrior Bugs

08/02/2005 01:47 mizike#1
#1. Fury build. (40 dps more)

as soon as you get crit'd on, you hit battleshout even if you got it on. [you need enrange 5/5 for max dmg].

#2. Arms build. (x2 dmg on swings)

when fighting 2 mobs hit sweeping strikes (required) then spam cleave. does double dmg bonus for some reason..



sorry for the shitty german translate. im a poopy hosen. =]
08/02/2005 02:35 modrit#2
bitte wie? kommt da wer hinterher? und kann mir helfen das zu verstehen?
08/02/2005 04:03 Naveronski#3
Can I get an english translation?
08/02/2005 04:51 Chronnox#4
hau das in den babelfish von altavista rein und du erhältst das orginal.

nein wirklich

Ich mein dann doch lieber das Orginal benutzen als es mit so ner Billig maschine
zu übersetzen.

Peace :rolleyes:

Btw.

das ist vom Babel fish so übersetzt worden, also vom Obrigen text ins Englische.

Two Kriegerwanzen. #1 anger building. (40dps bonus) enrange 5/5, as soon as you receive critical impact, take strike battle cry, even if you have it on, and it will promote their dps plus 40 for the 2 mins.
#2 arm building. (X2 dmg) comprehensive strike takes, and when fighting 2 mobilization, strike sweep strikes, splits then spammt. It on making doubles damage for some reasons to terminate. It is nicely given up if the mobilization, in 5 seconds to die =

Irgendwie verständlicher...

P.
08/02/2005 04:53 kakaman#5
Babel Fish Translation

In English:
Two Kriegerwanzen. #1 anger building. (40dps bonus) enrange 5/5, as soon as you receive critical impact, take strike battle cry, even if you have it on, and it will promote their dps plus 40 for the 2 mins. #2 arm building. (X2 dmg) comprehensive strike takes, and when fighting 2 mobilization, strike sweep strikes, splits then spammt. It on making doubles damage for some reasons to terminate. It is nicely given up if the mobilization, in 5 seconds to die = :bandit:
08/02/2005 19:47 Naveronski#6
Thank you for the translation, it helps a lot.
08/02/2005 22:39 hehelol#7
aehm lol bitte auf deutsch danke ^^
08/02/2005 23:26 dochollywo#8
ist 1. nicht nur ein anzeigefehler?