[Release] CodeDragon's WarRock Packet Logger

Hi guys!

It has been a while since I've posted anything. You might already have noticed it. I found a source of a WarRock packet logger that I wrote in C# months ago. I found it during a clean-up of my hard drive disk and I thought it would be a waste if I just deleted it from my hard drive disk. So I've decided to fully release the source code for you guys! Feel free to change anything inside this logger if you want and share it with others!

Note: this requires WinPCap which can be found [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...].

Screenshot:
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Very nice, Codedragon. I'll test it out later, maybe write it in C++, based on yours. Thanks! :)

Well why do you use Winpcap? I still do not understand why people keep using it, you can bind any socket and listen the connections of them.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Array.Copy Well why do you use Winpcap? I still do not understand why people keep using it, you can bind any socket and listen the connections of them.

Because i think him posted project by another person and don't know what is socket and how to costruct it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alliance™ Because i think him posted project by another person and don't know what is socket and how to costruct it.

Are we talking about the same person? :confused:

Nice Release.

Nice Release,but you should handle splitted packets

Quote:

Originally Posted by Array.Copy Well why do you use Winpcap? I still do not understand why people keep using it, you can bind any socket and listen the connections of them.

Why are you posting so much bullshit?

Winpcap is a well known reliable library and no one is forced to reinvent the wheel

Question for you too, why are you still alive?

I post bullshit, but you are a shit.

Btw i just find useless to be dependent from a library when you can do the same work without it

Quote:

Originally Posted by Array.Copy Btw i just find useless to be dependent from a library when you can do the same work without it

I find it 'bullshit' to re-write code over and over again if someone else wrote it. I don't want to waste time on writing the same thing over and over again.

Libraries are written to speed-up things so you don't have to re-write it.
I don't care what you say about it ToXiiC, you don't even have a programming degree so you shouldn't even talk about this advanced stuff.

I don't care how skilled you are without your degree you're talking bullshit.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sleutel I find it 'bullshit' to re-write code over and over again if someone else wrote it. I don't want to waste time on writing the same thing over and over again. Libraries are written to speed-up things so you don't have to re-write it. I don't care what you say about it ToXiiC, you don't even have a programming degree so you shouldn't even talk about this advanced stuff. I don't care how skilled you are without your degree you're talking bullshit.

Just ignore him, he isn't skilled and has no knowledge, lol.

Ohhh WOMBO combo

Btw @CodeDragon is ok to have dependencies as dll but I don't like it due you must install winpcap and this can be quite annoying

Quote:

Originally Posted by Array.Copy Question for you too, why are you still alive? I post bullshit, but you are a shit. Btw i just find useless to be dependent from a library when you can do the same work without it

why do you complain about everything here?
If you don't like the users or forum then just leave the forum nobody needs you here.


Nice release I will check this out today :D

Man, i'm not complaining, and i like codedragon, he's a my friend, he gives me tips and i try too.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Array.Copy Ohhh WOMBO combo Btw @CodeDragon is ok to have dependencies as dll but I don't like it due you must install winpcap and this can be quite annoying

example:
.net applications also require .net framework to be installed. this could be annoying too, but its common.

and:
vpn software requires a virtual network adapter to be installed, which is common for this case too.

(my) conclusion:
if you want a sniffer working, deliver a depending application to lower development cost, since really few capturing applications are using winpcap. it's common dependency in this sector.

imho (hope you all know the meaning):
youre dumbshit

Hey there...
Im kinda nub in hack stuff...
I would like 2know is this software, can record, like who u kill, who kill you etc etc...
in text...

thx for feedback, and sorry for my ignorance x)