Search pixel in not visible zone of the screen?

12/17/2013 20:26 fuso98#1
My question is simple. I want to be able to search pixel in the background with normal autoit function (pixelsearch and other).
My screen resolution is of 1280x800, if i move a window at coordinate (1280,80)
is possbile to make a pixelsearch and click with mouse (maybe control click?) ?
12/17/2013 20:34 alpines#2
So you want to search for pixels while the window is in the background, is that right?
12/17/2013 20:46 YatoDev#3
Quote:
Originally Posted by alpines View Post
So you want to search for pixels while the window is in the background, is that right?
out of that zone where you can see windows on your monitor.
Fuso stop trying like this. its real shit ;)

Ink's .dll is the only way for searching in background,at the moment.
12/17/2013 21:03 fuso98#4
Quote:
Originally Posted by »FlutterShy™ View Post
out of that zone where you can see windows on your monitor.
Fuso stop trying like this. its real shit ;)

Ink's .dll is the only way for searching in background,at the moment.
it cost 20€ and web site is off :(
12/17/2013 21:08 lolkop#5
working with background processes should never be pixel based <.<

for network actions, use network functions...
for memory actions, use memory functions...
for control actions, use control functions...
12/17/2013 21:22 Shadow992#6
Quote:
Originally Posted by »FlutterShy™ View Post
out of that zone where you can see windows on your monitor.
Fuso stop trying like this. its real shit ;)

Ink's .dll is the only way for searching in background,at the moment.
Not right, have a look at:
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Basic usage is:
Take a background Screenshot (what is possible with WinApi) and search for pixels in that screenshot (using GDI/WinApi) it is not that complicated but extremly slow in AutoIt.
12/17/2013 21:56 YatoDev#7
Quote:
Originally Posted by lolkop View Post
working with background processes should never be pixel based <.<

for network actions, use network functions...
for memory actions, use memory functions...
for control actions, use control functions...
wont work

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadow992 View Post
Not right, have a look at:
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Basic usage is:
Take a background Screenshot (what is possible with WinApi) and search for pixels in that screenshot (using GDI/WinApi) it is not that complicated but extremly slow in AutoIt.
=Wont work on an online browser space game ith fast ships and aliens ....

(fuso use fastfind)
12/17/2013 22:00 alpines#8
Why would it not work? You can create many things without Pixel work.
12/17/2013 22:08 lolkop#9
Quote:
Originally Posted by »FlutterShy™ View Post
wont work
lol :rolleyes:
12/17/2013 22:36 fuso98#10
Quote:
Originally Posted by lolkop View Post
working with background processes should never be pixel based <.<

for network actions, use network functions...
for memory actions, use memory functions...
for control actions, use control functions...
for network-> packet are crypted
for memory-> it's a browser game without installer
for control-> i'm trying to do controlclick+pixelsearch into a background window

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadow992 View Post
Not right, have a look at:
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Basic usage is:
Take a background Screenshot (what is possible with WinApi) and search for pixels in that screenshot (using GDI/WinApi) it is not that complicated but extremly slow in AutoIt.
I'm using fastfind, but it's too slow take a screen shot, is this the problem :/
12/18/2013 13:16 YatoDev#11
Quote:
Originally Posted by alpines View Post
Why would it not work? You can create many things without Pixel work.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lolkop View Post
lol :rolleyes:
as fuso sayed its a full encrypted flash game. We had many discussions before this why you cant programm a packet/memory bot for darkorbit.

I know but not on this game. (Antibot will ban you instant)
12/26/2015 02:33 savigun#12
I know it's been a looong time since this thread was active, but after 2 years, I am asking if you found the solution to this. Will taking off screen window snapshots work?