LOTF or TQ Binary?

05/17/2009 23:55 ilirivezaj#1
I mean these are both great servers but I dont know why anyone would still be using the Land of the Forgotten source still. I mean think about it. TQ Binary has the newest pacth and its more stable and that much coding is not even needed. Its easier to use and easier to set up. So TQ binaries is a better source than LOFT. Even though it is illegal xD.

Your opinion?
05/18/2009 00:13 Hoven#2
so basicly your saying leaching and possibly getting sued is better then actually doing something that can make you smarter, and can get you a job when your older?

Lotf>Binary

(Land Of The Forgotten is a form of lotf, its not the "lotf" source we all use)
05/18/2009 00:39 danielachraf#3
If you can't code or you don't want to start learning coding on lotf so use binary
05/18/2009 01:34 ilirivezaj#4
daniel i added you on msn if you could answer that would be great
05/18/2009 03:05 Epic-Chaos#5
my opinion is that 90% of the people are just following what others say like for instance
"
Quote:
LOTF is better then Binary
Binary = Fail"
// sorry about that lol forgot to fix it
and so on and so forth but really Binary can actuly teach people a few things if they actuly sit back and look how it is set up and see how it works its really the same as LOTF but better more stable if people would have common since to look and see how its built and actuly build a source like that then wala there you go but all of you dont take the time to do that but hey lazy people rule the world thes days so good luck theres my opinion on the subject.
05/18/2009 04:24 LetterX#6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Epic-Chaos View Post
Binary = Fail
edit: epic-chaos edited post...making my response seem idiotic D:
If binary = fail, then why is the image in your signature a "5065" server.. or binary? X.x

@OP: Neither. Both suck. Yes, Binaries are more stable; but why do you want to run a zombie CO server, where you can't edit shit except through whatever it calls for in the database?
LOTF, on the other hand, is poorly coded. Yes, I understand this is Tanel's second source; but for it to be so widespread like it is because of the amount of [poorly-made] "features" is truly pathetic. LOTF's prime was July - November, why people want it back is beyond me. There have been a couple of better sources released on elitepvpers that have so much potential but were killed because of the lack of pre-coded or pre-released features built into it.
In the end, my conclusion is this community is lazy and almost everyone expects the other guy to do the job...but, as we can see, doesn't work out when that other guy expects the same thing.

edit: @Hoven, you might not have seen the original un-edited post he had.
05/18/2009 04:31 Hoven#7
Quote:
Originally Posted by LetterX View Post
If binary = fail, then why is the image in your signature a "5065" server.. or binary? X.x
u misinterpreted what he said, read it again please