lcsource

[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Authors

Christian Roggia
Andrea Ragusa

Full source code of 2005 server files and 2013 emulator

where is there the source ?

[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

yeah nice thanks but is very old the 2009 very better ;D

welche der Source Codes brauch ich um den clienten zu verändern?

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmaZinGHaZeNr! welche der Source Codes brauch ich um den clienten zu verändern?

Den Client kannst du nur mit dem Client Source Code Verändern oder mit assemble.

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewGothic Shut up.

Ehm..

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmaZinGHaZeNr! Ehm..

Wenn du schon QUOTE nutzt mach es auch richtig oder lass es einfach aber was will man in dieser Section erwarten^^

Quote:

Originally Posted by damona yeah nice thanks but is very old the 2009 very better ;D

The 2009 source is useless, as 99% of people with it don't even know how to use it. With it being "closed source" among these people, it will never get the input it needs to be any good. If me and others contribute to making a public project like this, it can and will become better then even the official server files. Since we can commit patches and fixes easily to the dupes and other issues. No single person can write perfectly stable and bug free server files, usually its good to have 2-3 of your friends to look over your source code before you publish a server based off it. So in reality, the 2009 source might be a better base to start from. But if you're going to try fixing it yourself, is useless as you will never get all of the issues with it fixed. With open source projects anyone and everyone can view the code and point out where there might be problems.

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarmongerR23 The 2009 source is useless, as 99% of people with it don't even know how to use it. With it being "closed source" among these people, it will never get the input it needs to be any good. If me and others contribute to making a public project like this, it can and will become better then even the official server files. Since we can commit patches and fixes easily to the dupes and other issues. No single person can write perfectly stable and bug free server files, usually its good to have 2-3 of your friends to look over your source code before you publish a server based off it. So in reality, the 2009 source might be a better base to start from. But if you're going to try fixing it yourself, is useless as you will never get all of the issues with it fixed. With open source projects anyone and everyone can view the code and point out where there might be problems.

And since it is this very section we are talking about 90% will take the source to publish their own server even if they didn't contribute to the project. Pretty bad idea in my opinion.