Help me please

Which of these files should I upgrade?

Authentication.cs
Forward.cs
PasswordCryptographySeed.cs
AuthCryptography.cs
ConquerPasswordCryptpographer.cs
GameCryptography.cs
RC5.cs

I made a comparison between a source 5375 is 5527 is the only thing that changes in these two versions is the Authentication.cs

The authentication of the source 5375 is -> if (type == 1086)
The authentication of the source 5527 is -> if (type == 1060)

Mr. Fang is now what should I change to log the new update?

I beg for your help friend..

The current version of my source is 5527.

has nothing to do with the .cs files.

Their name and contents can be whatever you decide they are.

The only thing you need to change is whatever changes between the two patches! (client version... not the server source you're using). The packets themselves will change slightly between those two patches so you'll need to ensure all your offsets are still correct in your various packets (most likely hero information and entity spawn will be the main ones effected)

I told you exactly what you need to do for patch 5527. If you didn't message me to read what I have to say, then why are you still spamming me on every single social medium I belong to? I'm done seeing this fucking message. It's time you piss someone else off.

Edit : also, why are you updating your source to 5527 if it's already 5527? Fuck it. I don't want to know. You're someone else's problem now.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adventure-MMO Mr. Fang is now what should I change to log the new update? I beg for your help friend.. The current version of my source is 5527.

Should u beg for others to have your Question Answered ???

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fаng I told you exactly what you need to do for patch 5527. If you didn't message me to read what I have to say, then why are you still spamming me on every single social medium I belong to? I'm done seeing this fucking message. It's time you piss someone else off. Edit : also, why are you updating your source to 5527 if it's already 5527? Fuck it. I don't want to know. You're someone else's problem now.

I think he simply doesn't know the word downgrade and want to go to 5375.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiyono I think he simply doesn't know the word downgrade and want to go to 5375.

He's trying to use a 5600+ client while spamming me with that.
So who knows what he wants. I doubt he does either.

[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Look -> [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] I managed to upgrade

Look -> [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] I managed to upgrade

gratz for that but All u did is bypassing Password Encryption which Alot of ppls done this and iam Among them ..but it isnt Substituting Password Encryption for sure as i faced problem which is you can logging within any password ..Am not caring Much about upgrading source the much i care for making Stable / Well coded Source anyways GL

Quote:

Originally Posted by shadowman123 gratz for that but All u did is bypassing Password Encryption which Alot of ppls done this and iam Among them ..but it isnt Substituting Password Encryption for sure as i faced problem which is you can logging within any password ..Am not caring Much about upgrading source the much i care for making Stable / Well coded Source anyways GL

Could also just over-write the client password encryption versus cracking the new one.

Quote:

Originally Posted by pro4never Could also just over-write the client password encryption versus cracking the new one.

do u mean that when i bypass The password Encryption i should Create One and make it work ??

Quote:

Originally Posted by shadowman123 do u mean that when i bypass The password Encryption i should Create One and make it work ??

No, you have no clue what I'm talking about it sounds so just leave it at that.

You can overwrite the encryption in the client to either be the old encryption, or your own custom encryption.


A number of people have done things that way. It's not 'correct' but it works perfectly fine to decrypt the password in the current client version.

For my old source I didn't even use any of TQs encryptions.. I used the SHA256 (or 512) of a hash made from the account and password. Worked just fine, and was more secure in my opinion..