You shouldn't say.. :facepalm:Quote:
No, that won't change anything but naming it different.Quote:
Replace Name with UID its too much simple ..u couldnt even try to work on it
just Implenet it from any other working source
you miss understood what he want to do he said calling Monster using another Variable rather than name so UID or Mesh would be His Choise and i go for UID ...so Through monster UID Would work EfficientlyQuote:
It won't affect anything else and he will probably end up making a new thread asking for help, instead of reading my reply...
i dont like easy ways btw i like the most efficient way which create what i wantQuote:
i mainly make that post for the second problem
thanks shadowman123 and |xabi| u know always Egyption like the easy way.
As far as i understood he wants do to this basicallyQuote:
i dont like easy ways btw i like the most efficient way which create what i want
Beisde that No Egyptians only would do that every1 in this world would do the same
Your 2nd Problem ... try to check how it works in other sources and implement it in Your source
if (monster.id == 4152)
{
}
UID is Already Existed in The Database so he can Call it using UIDQuote:
and that wont happen with what you saidCode:if (monster.id == 4152) { }
y i shouldnt do this .. in the monstertable in impulse source it Checks the monster using its NameQuote:
Checking up for an integer is much faster than checking up a string.
@OP
Your monster class must have something like Mob.ID instead Mob.Name. It would be weird if you only stored monsters by name in a dictionary.