[Release] srgwdos

Page 1 of 2 1 2
03/31/2012 16:30 Dyno1#1
-ddos is illegal-

#removed content
03/31/2012 16:41 FoxRayz#2
File size 24kb? 1 post? smells more like a virus to me
03/31/2012 16:42 Getzabelz#3
This got deleted once already, so why the hell you post it again? It will be deleted aswell. You should buy a brain >.>
03/31/2012 16:45 Dyno1#4
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoxRayz View Post
File size 24kb? 1 post? smells more like a virus to me
Check the original if you wish, Are you dumb?
03/31/2012 16:46 PortalDark#5
this got deleted because of flame and possible virus
You could get in problems because of this
03/31/2012 16:51 Dyno1#6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Getzabelz View Post
This got deleted once already, so why the hell you post it again? It will be deleted aswell. You should buy a brain >.>
Cool story keyboard hero.
03/31/2012 16:57 Shifty*#7
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dyno1 View Post
Cool story keyboard hero.
U mad cause you can't use whatever you have in your head? Someone with averege iq should know if the thread got deleted he shouldn't post it again :facepalm:
03/31/2012 16:59 Dyno1#8
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shifty* View Post
U mad cause you can't use whatever you have in your head? Someone with averege iq should know if the thread got deleted he shouldn't post it again :facepalm:
You mad because I've re-released it so people can fix the exploit?
03/31/2012 17:00 PortalDark#9
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dyno1 View Post
You mad because I've re-released it so people can fix the exploit?
in fact ,i have link on my profile visitor message as backup
03/31/2012 17:09 Dyno1#10
Here is a decompiled source by .NET Reflector if that helps at all on fixing the exploit: [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

If you check the decompiled source by .NET Reflector, You can see it's no virus. So people like FoxRayz please GTFO.
03/31/2012 20:09 vorosmihaly#11
that "source" worths nothing,just saying..it's obfuscated and the code you "decompiled" is just some crap,it has no information in it.
03/31/2012 21:35 ✗EpicSoul✗#12
title should be changed to "[Re-Released]
03/31/2012 21:44 evestu#13
Quote:
Originally Posted by vorosmihaly View Post
that "source" worths nothing,just saying..it's obfuscated and the code you "decompiled" is just some crap,it has no information in it.

The source he or she released has got functions in it and makes sence to me it is not in "abc" source code.

but it shows that it is a client less conection and give's all the right packets and then spams the char login packet 3 times hence creating the IBUV cert error

The server expects the user login packet to be sent 1 time the server the returns the Capcha then user inputs code

if the server recives the user login packet more than 1 time like it expects it sends the error

the exploite then disconnects then sends the data again and loop loop loop

the IBUV part of the gateway server only has so many images to give users then it will runout and spamm not enought cert imgs or what ever by this time the gateway can not handel the amount of requests and shuts down
03/31/2012 22:24 MeGaMaX#14
its will not work with

Code:
if (((!(args[0] == "77.241.199.181") && !(args[0] == "bsgw.us.t")) && (!(args[0] == "tlh.us.t") && !(args[0] == "89.114.238.111"))) && ((!(args[0] == "silkliciou.com") && !(args[0] == "31.192.105.21")) && !(args[0] == "77.241.199.181")))
Or

Code:
77.241.199.185
bsgw.us.to
tlh.us.to
89.114.238.118
silklicious.com
31.192.105.27
77.241.199.186
its will give you
Code:
Console.WriteLine("Seems To Be Offline, Sleeping For 10 Seconds.");
;)

@the source your release its packed...
so delete it
i got the source code my self

and

this srdos use opcodes , packets.opcodes
04/01/2012 11:31 Dyno1#15
Quote:
Originally Posted by vorosmihaly View Post
that "source" worths nothing,just saying..it's obfuscated and the code you "decompiled" is just some crap,it has no information in it.
If you can't make any sence from the code, Then that's your problem..

You can clearly see what its doing...

Quote:
Originally Posted by ✗EpicSoul✗ View Post
title should be changed to "[Re-Released]
Yes your correct, If a MOD can change the thread title to "[Re-Released]" that will be great.
Page 1 of 2 1 2