Few Questions

Quote:

Originally Posted by shadowman123 1st question i Noticed That Donation packets r handled using BinaryWriter so is it good or bad ? 2nd question ...is There any working Packet sniffer Yet with 5570+ ? 3rd How can i send String Effect to Both Ground And Npc .. 4th How can i Make Item Counter in my Inventory Cuz i've seen smthing good at Angelic Co which is Admin count the number of dbs in my inventory and give 180 * Number of Dbs

Quote:

Q: How can i Make Item Counter in my Inventory Cuz i've seen smthing good at Angelic Co which is Admin count the number of dbs in my inventory and give 180 * Number of Dbs

Quote:

Originally Posted by ×Holo In all sources i've worked on.. you just have to use (itemID, itemPLUS, itemVALUE)

if (client.Inventory.Contains(1088000))
{
    client.Entity.DBCount += 1; //DBCount is uint instance = 0 At Entity.cs
}

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fаng Q: 1st question i Noticed That Donation packets r handled using BinaryWriter so is it good or bad ? Donation packets as in the packets for Nobility? I don't see why u'd use a binary writer to write a packet (unless you're working with differentiating lengths to strings and such). Do you mean the packets or saving info to the database? Q: 2nd question ...is There any working Packet sniffer Yet with 5570+ ? Well, no. I don't think there will be one for a very long time. I don't have permission to release mine since I didn't come up with the encryption on my own. I can always post packet logs for you if you ask for them though. There's also this: [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] Q: How can i send String Effect to Both Ground And Npc .. Send a string effect using the identity of an entity to send it to their body. Send a string effect using the x & y values of a coordinate to send it to a point on the ground. Q: How can i Make Item Counter in my Inventory Cuz i've seen smthing good at Angelic Co which is Admin count the number of dbs in my inventory and give 180 * Number of Dbs I'm not sure if this is what you mean, but basically he's just checking the Inventory's dictionary for an item name and counting the results (probably).

Quote:

Originally Posted by dego4ever 4th. you can make one like this Code: public ushort InventoryItemCount(uint ID) { if (ID == 0) return 0; ushort count = 0; foreach (Interfaces.IConquerItem item in Inventory.Objects) if (item.ID == ID) count++; return count; } & this exm for command Code: case "itemcount": { bool online = false; foreach (var Client in ServerBase.Kernel.GamePool.Values) { if (Client.Entity.Name.ToLower().Contains(Data[1])) { client.Send(new Message("Entity Have (" + Client.InventoryItemCount(uint.Parse(Data[2])) + ") items.", System.Drawing.Color.BurlyWood, GamePackets.Message.TopLeft)); online = true; break; } } if (!online) client.Send(new Message("Entity not online", System.Drawing.Color.BurlyWood, GamePackets.Message.TopLeft)); break; } & to test it "@itemcount char*name itemid"

Quote:

Originally Posted by _DreadNought_ As I learned from InfamousNoone himself, a ushort is inefficient in this case, the inventory handles 40 objects, a byte is smaller then a ushort and a bytes max value is 255, ushorts max value is something like 65535, so as you can see a byte is much more efficient in this case. Just saying.

Quote:

Originally Posted by _DreadNought_ As I learned from InfamousNoone himself, a ushort is inefficient in this case, the inventory handles 40 objects, a byte is smaller then a ushort and a bytes max value is 255, ushorts max value is something like 65535, so as you can see a byte is much more efficient in this case. Just saying. #edit An int would work great too, performance wise and int would work better, but efficiency wise a byte is more then big enough and more efficient. Thanks fang^.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fаng It depends on the machine. With mine, it's a long because I work on a *legitimate* 64bit processor (not just a 64bit operating system). Since the default word size of a 32bit processor is 32 bits, an int is more optimized to run on that processor. It'll be less expensive to increment and such in the for loop.

Quote:

Originally Posted by shadowman123 true Using Byte would be Much Professinaly but if i used uint , ushort , byte or even ulong it will work :D

Quote:

Originally Posted by _DreadNought_ Right right, Regardless, I am going to assume by both of our posts that we both agree that a ushort is far too big for his task. If you used a uint, ulong or a ushort it would idiotic, Why would you want to free up a uint, ulong or ushort's max value in memory? It's a waste of memory that will never get totally used up(Untill it gets disposed, of course, not that I know what im on about...) but yeah, a byte would free up 255 bytes in memory, of those a max of 40 would get filled up, so getting a ushort and freeing up 65535(or w/e the max value is) worth of memory and knowing you can only ever be using 40 bytes of that(max value of your inventory is 40, your counting items, it isnt gong above 40 :P) why would you free up 65535 worth of memory, or in a uint or ulongs case far more memory when a byte(255 bytes of memory) is all thats required? Even thats too much, hell, If I were you I would use a sbyte(max value 128 or w/e) Yeah, go use a sbyte, Occupies even less memory then a byte and an int.

foreach (Item item in Inventory)
{
     if (item.Name == "DragonBall")
          Mind.Blow();
}

Quote:

Originally Posted by _DreadNought_ As I learned from InfamousNoone himself, a ushort is inefficient in this case, the inventory handles 40 objects, a byte is smaller then a ushort and a bytes max value is 255, ushorts max value is something like 65535, so as you can see a byte is much more efficient in this case. Just saying. #edit An int would work great too, performance wise and int would work better, but efficiency wise a byte is more then big enough and more efficient. Thanks fang^. ;; Regardless, a ushort is far inefficient for this task, choose either a byte or an int, and I can also point out another flaw in the code ;O