[HelpRequest] C#

Quote:

fine what i got is that u can use prop. when u need to get something from private variable in some class so u make an object in ur class and get/set in that private variable class Quote: some class object for (another private class) another private class private variable get/set to get this variable right ? and sometimes when u need a live feed of a variable once it change and dont want to send method everytime like umm timer ? whenever the timer change it gives the value to the variable ? also umm to make some default options so if the client send that the player have a weird mesh it gives him a default one so others can see him ? about Inheritance umm like all apes is monsters but not all monsters is apes so it can be like monkyape.apes.monsters.level also snakes.apes.monsters.map o-0 did i got it right ? . ill go to read and try and come back ^^ ================================================== ========================== EDIT ================================================== ========================== i was right about prop. when u want to make a def. value for something so as pro said if client send a wrong mesh to the server the player dont be inv. to others (sorry poor english but he will work and get some money :P) here example from msdn  Spoiler Code: public class Date { private int month = 7; // Backing store public int Month { get { return month; } set { if ((value > 0) && (value < 13)) { month = value; } } } } but why dont he just do it to the returning value without get / set ? like before u return the value if plaplapla return variable else return default or maybe at receiving the variable ? if plaplapla somecode else SomeOtherCode (i mean in this example case on msdn , or umm is the point out of it not to get changed whatever what happen in the public class the get/set still have send the default value if the condition dont apply o-0 kinda default cons ?) here is another code from msdn and what i understanded (i did lil modf. and added some to test modf. a read only code)  Spoiler Code: thats the code source using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Text; namespace ConsoleApplication1 { class Program { public class Employee { public static int NumberOfEmployees; private static int counter; private string name; // A read-write instance property: public string Name { get { return name; } set { name = value; } } // A read-only static property: public static int Counter { get { return counter; } } // A Constructor: public Employee() { // Calculate the employee's number: counter = ++counter + NumberOfEmployees; } } class TestEmployee { static void Main() { Employee.NumberOfEmployees = 107; Employee e1 = new Employee(); e1.Name = "Claude Vige"; System.Console.WriteLine("Employee number: {0}", Employee.Counter); System.Console.WriteLine("Employee name: {0}", e1.Name); // now the counter wont be touched ? lets try it } } } } this is my edits to test some stuff using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Text; namespace ConsoleApplication1 { class Program { public class Employee { public static int NumberOfEmployees; private static int counter; private string name; // A read-write instance property: public string Name { get { return name; } set { name = value; } } // A read-only static property: public static int Counter { get { return counter; } } // A Constructor: public Employee() { // Calculate the employee's number: counter = ++counter + NumberOfEmployees; } } class TestEmployee { static void Main() { Employee.NumberOfEmployees = 107; Employee e1 = new Employee(); e1.Name = "Claude Vige"; System.Console.WriteLine("Employee number: {0}", Employee.Counter); System.Console.WriteLine("Employee name: {0}", e1.Name); // now the counter wont be touched ? lets try it [COLOR="Red"] Employee.Counter = 500; System.Console.WriteLine("new employee number:", Employee.Counter);[/COLOR] } } } } in my first edit VS figured out that Employee.Counter is a read only as when u call it , it get calculations Constructor in its own class and just gives u the value (and u cant do this Employee.Employee cuz it dont take any argm.) another test over here to make a def. value [COLOR="red"]get { if (counter > 100) return counter; else return 100; }[/COLOR] btw umm c# dont have something like this if (something) return x [B]:[/B] return y >> i mean this thing [B]: [/B], its only in c++ i guess so the idea of read only in get/set is just use get without set , return with another method than the one calculating umm i like what i just did :D disabled the set over properties and kept watching it here is the code and how it goes ! :D happy that now i understand it better ^___^ thanks guys u was really helpful :D i own u too much now XD  Spoiler Code: using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Text; namespace ConsoleApplication1 { class Program { public class Employee { private string name; public string Name { get { return name; } set { name = value; } } } public class Manager : Employee { private string name; // Notice the use of the new modifier: public new string Name { get { return name; } set { name = value + ", Manager"; } } } class TestHiding { static void Main() { Manager m1 = new Manager(); // Derived class property. m1.Name = "John"; // Base class property. ((Employee)m1).Name = "Mary"; System.Console.WriteLine("Name in the derived class is: {0}", m1.Name); System.Console.WriteLine("Name in the base class is: {0}", ((Employee)m1).Name); } } /* Output: Name in the derived class is: John, Manager Name in the base class is: Mary */ } } so here how it works go to main , it defined a new object m1 type of Manger class then m1.Name(prop.) sent string of "john" to class manger so it gone set ! set gave the string to value and figured out the name(value + "manger") gone back to main ((Employee)m1).Name = "Mary" >>> where Employee is an object of base (guess this is the inh. ?) and same is done with mary in Employee class so umm why he added [B]: Emplyee[/B] to header of manger class ? also why he added ((Employee).m1).name not an m2(object of employee) ? so i can figure out its Inheritance as the parents is manger which gave employee its objects :D ? and to access the objects for employee we do ([B](Employee).m1[/B]).name which m1 was an object for manger , am i right :D ? lets do a test and figure out xD test 1 : remove the Inheritance (as i assume it) result 1 : WOW it got error at ((Employee)m1).Name = "Mary"; saying m1 is local variable and it cant convert it from manger to Employee xD so im right test 2 : stop inheritance and add another object for employee ! result 2 : WORKS LIKE CHARM ! i teached myself both of them with ur helps by being smart not reading 400 page in a useless books xD i love u guyssss :D thanks for help (not gay :P just so thankful for helping me :D)