[Application] CO2 Underground

Hi, i was refered and was recommended to apply to join the e*pvp underground for Conquer Online by *M*. The reason i would like to be in the CO2 Underground is to continue development of my bot, the features i have planned for my bot, i do not feel the general public are ready for/can be trusted to have, such as actual smart botting -_-, much like bjx, but currently without a standalone client. I currently have much of the framework completed for the bot, mainly what is left is finishing packet parsing and manipulation, coding the AI for hunting, communication, and such. The pathfinding is completed and is created by parsing the DMap files, i will soon be adding weighting to the paths to make the bot less likely to travel the same path, thus providing a more human like bot, incase TQ ever decides to actually do something useful against botting. I am currently not at my house so i can't provide as indepth of a application as i would like, but i am not sure when i will be getting back to my house, and figured it would be best if i went ahead and posted my application. Thank you for your time.
-J00lz/Robsta

I was wondering what made you come back, then I checked egy co to read ur topic about that bot and it seems to be down, any idea whats with that?
Anyway, no one has been let in since a1blaster vanished.
If anyone can let you in you have my vote.

I can vouch for him Lowfyr/S.A.L.O.M.O.N.

[X]Yes
[ ]No

Same here.

He's shown very good skills in programming.
Vote:
Yes [X]
No [ ]

Hiyoal :D

u got some ideeas down there // :) nice :p

I say no.
You copied the name of my hack and posted it on egyco, you tried to take credit for something that you did not make and my posts about it on egyco were deletedm even my user there. Also you claim to be the joolz that made CS hacks back in 2002, now I can't be sure if you are the guy but it seems unlikely, and IF you are the guy you are pretty much remembered on GD and the CS hack coding scene as a ripper / leaker / someone that got credit for other peoples work.
Maybe I got the wrong impression of you but I doubt it.

Sorry if my english is bad.

The underground supervises any leakage onto the public section...Look what happened to Queen.

Robsta is a great coder who knows a lot.

Vote stands as YES.

Hiyoal

I personally don't think it should be an application for the admins to view. I think it should be up to the people already in the section because it is their private work that will be exposed to any new member to that section. There should be a vote in there, not an application here :[ that's my 2 cents.

Quote:

Originally Posted by bone-you I personally don't think it should be an application for the admins to view. I think it should be up to the people already in the section because it is their private work that will be exposed to any new member to that section. There should be a vote in there, not an application here :[ that's my 2 cents.

Agree!!

i'm not sure if i'm suppose to reply in my application thread, but i thought i should atleast defend myself.

@RootCore... I don't follow the names of all the co hacks out there, if i spent the time to go through every possible hack/bot/n00b macro to see if a name was already used, then i wouldn't be spending much time coding now would I, i simply did not pay attention to the names of other hacks and labeled my hack COHook, which when it was brought to my attention there was a hack already out there named that, i quickly corrected the issue and renamed it to CODXHook. And again, as for taking credit for something i did not make, i'm pretty sure that was quickly corrected as soon as you brought it to my attention, i simply forgot to place a credits section in the readme, and i dont know how many times i appologized for that simple overlook. And again, as for me having a reputation as a leaker/ripper, i never leaked anything, i released cdkeys to the public, but i had obtained them myself, i had posted them in the underground myself and then i decided to release them to the public, so what... did i leak my own stuff? I guess i could be accused of ripping because i used some code from other hacks to get development of metacheat going, but i eventually recoded nearly everything in it, so it was eventually all 100% original, 90% of the hacks are based off another hack, its called building upon something that is already there, do you think that every time a new car company comes out with a new car, they redesign everything so that nothing is even remotely based off anything else? No, they go with what works, i have yet to see a car company re-inventing the wheel simply because another car company is using it, and i also dont see them giving credit to cavemen for inventing the wheel in the first place... If this post sounds like i'm lashing out at you, i'm not, i'm simply trying to defend myself so people do not have the wrong impression of me.

***EDIT***
i also do not know why you would bring up your user and posts being deleted here, i had nothing to do with that, that must be something to do with the staff there, and that should be taken up with them, not said as if you were accusing me of trying to silence you, if i was trying to silence you, i wouldn't have edited my own topic and said that i added credits to the readme and put thanks to you for bringing it to my attention.

CO2Hook is based on someone else hack, everyone rips at somepoint

Quote:

Originally Posted by *M* CO2Hook is based on someone else hack, everyone rips at somepoint

No it's not, I wrote that from scratch, well used high6's jmp patch function and took some of the ideas from him. How is that ripping?