[UNOFFICIAL] List Of Legit and Scam Providers List

Quote:

Originally Posted by lort1234 They have been ud for about a month now and also they where ud for a couple of months before that. BUT Fluent and QC/Matrix are both rage focus cheats, so they will get dt more often, that doesn’t make their product less worth it, it just means it’s more meant for people that wanna rage cheat. They are both providers with a long history of having good products for rust. I have heard the rumors, but is there any proof to it? If not they should also be added. Monolith was dt a week or so ago, yes but that HAPPENS to every provider, it should be added since it have gotten back to being UD again, and is a good product. Just because a product gets dt doesn’t mean it isn’t “legit” You thread is litually about providers that offer a product of value and deliver upon that product, not about if it meets one of your criteria, otherwise this thread should be someting else and not what it is now.

the thread is about offering lontivity providers, fluent and qc dont other that, i will rethink on monlith however and division

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relentless the thread is about offering lontivity providers, fluent and qc dont other that, i will rethink on monlith however and division

Then you should close this thead and make a new one since this thread is litually called “List Of Legit and Scam Providers List” which isn’t what you wanna share.

Neither Fluent or QC/Mateix is a scam provider, so they should be on this list.

Quote:

Originally Posted by lort1234 Have already told you that multiple times. Fluent have been ud for a long time and have been having the best rage cheat for about 2 years now. Quantumcheats/Matrix have had a ud product for a long time now and have had a product for rust for years also now. Devision have had a ud product for some time now and have had a product for rust for about a year now. Monolith have had a ud product for about 6 months and got dt but is ud again. All of these providers have been in the cheating scene for rust for a long time and have proven their trust multiple times. I first mentioned this to you months ago where i said you should probably add and catagory for “rage” and “known” providers, instead just for “legit” and “dma”. Also only adding providers which have been ud for +3 months isn’t ideal, since some providers forcus on rage features which is known to be targeted more often.

Rage features don't get a cheat targeted lmao, Devision was literally detected for half this year and had multiple banwaves a week for months, not to mention their panel literally has an option called "Remote Code Execution", along with other options like BSODing anyone you want. Don't believe me?

Here is a picture of their panel - [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Quote:

Originally Posted by lort1234 Then you should close this thead and make a new one since this thread is litually called “List Of Legit and Scam Providers List” which isn’t what you wanna share. Neither Fluent or QC/Mateix is a scam provider, so they should be on this list.

Absolutely agreed, but there is a way more providers that should be listed. Such as Disconnect (their external was UD for many months and they listed their internal again), Invasion (Pretty cool and stable cheat), NaxoProject (Cheat released 4 years ago with very low detections) and so on.

Then it is quite funny that Dopamine is listed when it gets detected every other month.

Quote:

Originally Posted by lort1234 Then you should close this thead and make a new one since this thread is litually called “List Of Legit and Scam Providers List” which isn’t what you wanna share. Neither Fluent or QC/Mateix is a scam provider, so they should be on this list.

@[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] , user has a point, but I want to add my input on this topic;

When calling a cheat provider legit, we need to look for those with an overall positive reputation, transparent information (clear communication on a product detection), responsive customer support, high-quality and regularly updated products, and a clear refund policy (Whether it is provided or not, it has to be clearly stated).

Conversely, scam providers will have negative reviews, lack transparency, offer poor customer support, provide low-quality cheats that frequently get detected, have security concerns like malware, and will have no clear communications on their refund options (if any. Again, there should be a clear communication this pre-purchase so the buyer is aware).

In the case of a product that frequently gets detected, if the owners are putting in the effort to communicate this with their users, in my opinion, this provider should be listed as a legit provider given that they check out the other tick boxes mentioned above. It would go a long way to have them on the list and switch their status to UD/DTC as time goes on, and if there is a pattern on detection perhaps adding a note on the side with a "Frequently Detected"

I hope my input helps both parties above that are in a disagreement.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relentless the thread is about offering lontivity providers, fluent and qc dont other that, i will rethink on monlith however and division

If, in any other case, this thread is about providers that have been offering longevity and detection-free history, the title might be misleading and might need a change.

Quote:

Originally Posted by fangirl89 Rage features don't get a cheat targeted lmao, Devision was literally detected for half this year and had multiple banwaves a week for months, not to mention their panel literally has an option called "Remote Code Execution", along with other options like BSODing anyone you want. Don't believe me? Here is a picture of their panel - [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

1. Never said rage features get the cheat detected, said that rage cheats are more focused than legit cheats, and that have proven multiple times.

2. Never said Devision haven’t had a bad detection history, but they have been ud for a long time now and the panel you are talking about it common for devs to implement for Security reasons, unless it’s been proven they have done something like the rumor above, then i don’t see anything that makes them “untrusted”

3. My whole point of my posts is that this thread is called “legit provider and scam providers” all providers that have proven to be legit should be on here, matter or not if they focus on a rage cheat or legit cheat.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Player1Ready @[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] , user has a point, but I want to add my input on this topic; When calling a cheat provider legit, we need to look for those with an overall positive reputation, transparent information (clear communication on a product detection), responsive customer support, high-quality and regularly updated products, and a clear refund policy (Whether it is provided or not, it has to be clearly stated). Conversely, scam providers will have negative reviews, lack transparency, offer poor customer support, provide low-quality cheats that frequently get detected, have security concerns like malware, and will have no clear communications on their refund options (if any. Again, there should be a clear communication this pre-purchase so the buyer is aware). In the case of a product that frequently gets detected, if the owners are putting in the effort to communicate this with their users, in my opinion, this provider should be listed as a legit provider given that they check out the other tick boxes mentioned above. It would go a long way to have them on the list and switch their status to UD/DTC as time goes on, and if there is a pattern on detection perhaps adding a note on the side with a "Frequently Detected" I hope my input helps both parties above that are in a disagreement. If, in any other case, this thread is about providers that have been offering longevity and detection-free history, the title might be misleading and might need a change.

Agree with everything you said, Thanks for a better explanation. :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by lort1234 1. Never said rage features get the cheat detected, said that rage cheats are more focused than legit cheats, and that have proven multiple times. 2. Never said Devision haven’t had a bad detection history, but they have been ud for a long time now and the panel you are talking about it common for devs to implement for Security reasons, unless it’s been proven they have done something like the rumor above, then i don’t see anything that makes them “untrusted” 3. My whole point of my posts is that this thread is called “legit provider and scam providers” all providers that have proven to be legit should be on here, matter or not if they focus on a rage cheat or legit cheat. Agree with everything you said, Thanks for a better explanation. :)

1. Are you retarded? Reread what you said, then what I said. You have zero proof rage features get a cheat targetted (your own words), because it's not true

2. If you think having rce in a cheat panel is common you are delusional and there's no point discussing further with you

Quote:

Originally Posted by fangirl89 1. Are you retarded? Reread what you said, then what I said. You have zero proof rage features get a cheat targetted (your own words), because it's not true 2. If you think having rce in a cheat panel is common you are delusional and there's no point discussing further with you

RCE on the panel doesn't really mean anything, as long as access to it is controlled. You're running their code on your machine completely blindly regardless.

I will just say it's not normal to have RCE option and there is absolutely no need to have it added to auth panel. BSOD option either. Shady and insane to me.

Especially if those permissions are unlocked to support members.

RCE can be used for sending logs but it's not common. Main reason to have it is to be able to execute malware or bad code since users are mostly forced to completely disable antivirus and security that protects them or at least flags such stuff.

I won't be accusing based on screenshot but my opinion is having it is for extra income.

Especially if not stated on website that they have option to RCE without notice to customers. That must be written in website at least in TOS page.

Evade detected. =/ That wasn't long.
*

Quote:

Originally Posted by hubertballs RCE on the panel doesn't really mean anything, as long as access to it is controlled. You're running their code on your machine completely blindly regardless.

Thats not the point, why would you have it implemented into your panel if you didnt plan on using it? Anti cheats could also brick your PC by this logic, do you think they have these features implemented into their backend to release upon random consumers?
Insane.

Is Ring - 1 detected rn?

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpooferPalace Is Ring - 1 detected rn?

it gets dtc quite often, i wouldnt advise using it

A lot of terrible opinions have been made in this thread lately. "If my favorite cheat isn't on the list then the list should be deleted" :lul:

Regardless this is the overall best and most well-kept list of cheat providers on this whole forum... Well played [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relentless the thread is about offering lontivity providers, fluent and qc dont other that, i will rethink on monlith however and division

What software would you recommend for me?

I am - a casual player somewhat competitive, Player ESP and "help" with recoil/aim is really my only concern. I dont need spiderman or ore esp or anything. I would LOVE built in spoofer. Seratonin is a little pricey. Fluent seems to be the go to everyone is saying but im not looking to rage

What do you think