hat jeder ab und an...bin auch von 1660 auf 1530 an einem stück gedroppt :DQuote:
Eigentlich beschwere ich mich ungerne. Aber Leute? Was soll ich machen, wenn das gesamte Team feedet?
Gebt euch das mal, einen Tag lang, jedes Rank verloren, jedes erdenkliche Rank-Game. Die gesamte history am...
Gab's das auch mal bei euch?
von 1750 zu 1600 LOLQuote:
von 1350 auf 1550 LOLQuote:
Mir gehts genauso ;(Quote:
von 1550 auf 1350 LOLQuote:
FYA UmashiQuote:
A lot of people are always talking about how the Elo system needs a fix because it clearly doesn't work. It's not that it doesn't work though, it's just that it appears to not work.
Let's say you do well in 50% of your games. Will you gain elo? Will you lose elo? Or will you stay the same?
Now let's say you do well in 80% of your games. Will you gain elo? Will you lose elo? Or will you stay the same?
Now let's say you do well in 90% of your games. Will you gain elo? Will you lose elo? Or will you stay the same?
I suggest you answer all of these questions before moving on and think about it hard. Chances are most people will answer all three wrong.
This is a quote from wikipedia on elo "The Elo rating system is a method for calculating the relative skill levels of players in two-player games such as chess."
It's designed around two players. That's why most people will answer the questions wrong. In a two player system if you do well in 50% of your games you will stay the same, and I'm sure you can figure out the other two.
In a ten player game (two teams of five) however, it will not work out this way. Logically to stay at the same elo you must do well in 80% of your games to make up for the other four players on your team. That means you must do well in 4 of every 5 games.
The person who does well in 90% of their games, nine of every ten games, will gain elo because they break the chain of people who do good in 4 out of 5. They will move up to the elo where people do good in 9 of 10 games until they can improve even further like doing good in 19 of 20 games.
So if you do good in 50% of your games you should lose elo. Lose a lot of elo until you reach that 80% area.
This is why the elo system seems broken, if you do good in four of every five games you would think you should gain elo. You should be winning more. When in fact you are at your proper elo because proper elo is where you do good in 4 of 5 games, or 9 of 10, or 19 of 20. Your elo is decided by how many consecutive games you can do that you do well in and you must break a 80% win ratio to move up. Or if you already did you must break 90% or 95%.
So at the end of the day you should have to win the large majority of your games to keep your elo .It seems flawed but it's perfectly balanced because everybody has to deal with it. This is why elo hell seems to exist but does not. The elo system requires you to excel, not just do well.
Hodequetscha :mofo:Quote:
This players in this elo. tooooo GUD!
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]Quote:
This players in this elo. tooooo GUD!
yes, bro ... ich hatte gerade lw, weil keine zeit für neues spiel und dann denk ich mir omg dann postest du doch mal deine history nur um den leuten zu zeigen wie gut du bist und das deine partner foll schlecht sind, yoQuote: