-_-
hoping clientless and autorecon to get back..
i miss botting :(
hoping clientless and autorecon to get back..
i miss botting :(
yes it does go mine as soon as it hits 70...Quote:
As I heard it, it's a completely different function, they are 2 seperate things and I haven't heard that it goes and mines right after it hits 70, you have to set that up yourself after the account becomes 70.
I don't see how the rename is stupid at all, if anything COFarmer and ConquerAI were both accurate names. The bot is a farmer, and a form of artificial intelligence. If you must insist on critiquing names;Quote:
looks like "COF" is no more renamed it something stupid...and there whole selling point is that there mine bot will lvl you to lvl 70 and go mine, thats the pitch LOL...
You are aware that CoGenius does the exact same thing except for the lvling part? (Which will soon be implemented).Quote:
yes it does go mine as soon as it hits 70...
And lvls up ALL the accounts at one time,only takes around 5 hours and you got 66 accounts lvled and mining...
It also trades ALL Gems,DB's,MetsGold to one account,so you dont have to log in every one of your miners just to get there goods off them...
Basically its set it up,then go to work,sleep or hang out with friends,come back and your rich ^_^ Trade goods to your main and your ready to go :P
Are you sure?Quote:
If we refer to [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] everything pretty much prefers to a person. A bot isn't a person simply put, no matter how "smart" it may be.
A dictionary definition beats wikipedia every day of the week, as the dictionary definition is the official definition, not a collection of quotes, references and opinions.Quote:
Are you sure?
Genius (plural geniuses) is something or someone embodying exceptional intellectual ability, creativity, or originality, typically to a degree that is associated with the achievement of unprecedented insight.
There is no scientifically precise definition of genius, and indeed the question of whether the notion itself has any real meaning is a subject of current debate. The term is used in various ways: to refer to a particular aspect of an individual, or the individual in their entirety; to a scholar in many subjects (e.g. Leonardo da Vinci) or a scholar in a single subject (e.g. Albert Einstein or Nikola Tesla). Research into what causes genius and mastery is still in its early stages, but psychology already offers relevant insights.
Origin of the word
In ancient Rome, the genius (plural genii) was the guiding spirit or tutelary deity of a person, family (gens), or place (genius loci). The noun is related to the Latin verb gigno, genui, genitus, "to bring into being, create, produce." Because the achievements of exceptional individuals seemed to indicate the presence of a particularly powerful genius, by the time of Augustus the word began to acquire its secondary meaning of "inspiration, talent."
It doesn't say in any dictionairy that a genius is only reffered to people, so what's your argument for that?Quote:
A dictionary definition beats wikipedia every day of the week, as the dictionary definition is the official definition, not a collection of quotes, references and opinions.
You try pretty hard, that's all I have to say. Simply not worth replying to in a serious manor.Quote:
Are you sure?
Genius (plural geniuses) is something or someone embodying exceptional intellectual ability, creativity, or originality, typically to a degree that is associated with the achievement of unprecedented insight.
There is no scientifically precise definition of genius, and indeed the question of whether the notion itself has any real meaning is a subject of current debate. The term is used in various ways: to refer to a particular aspect of an individual, or the individual in their entirety; to a scholar in many subjects (e.g. Leonardo da Vinci) or a scholar in a single subject (e.g. Albert Einstein or Nikola Tesla). Research into what causes genius and mastery is still in its early stages, but psychology already offers relevant insights.
Origin of the word
In ancient Rome, the genius (plural genii) was the guiding spirit or tutelary deity of a person, family (gens), or place (genius loci). The noun is related to the Latin verb gigno, genui, genitus, "to bring into being, create, produce." Because the achievements of exceptional individuals seemed to indicate the presence of a particularly powerful genius, by the time of Augustus the word began to acquire its secondary meaning of "inspiration, talent."
I didnt realise i was arguing for/against that....i was merely stating that the dictionary definition is more accurate than wikipedia.Quote:
It doesn't say in any dictionairy that a genius is only reffered to people, so what's your argument for that?
But it comes into definition 1 doesn't it? Since when was it that the majority of the definitions has to fit? And you do realize we are talking about a bot here right? Stating that a bot can't be called "Genius" is purely idiotic. Because after all it is a name.Quote:
I didnt realise i was arguing for/against that....i was merely stating that the dictionary definition is more accurate than wikipedia.
But if you wish i can get into that aswell..
Well CoGenius doesn't come under definition 2 or 3 of the dictionary and i would argue that CoGenius doesn't have "an exceptional natural capacity of intellect" because for one any intellect it has would be artificially granted to it by yourself, it has never naturally acquired it and secondly the bot doesn't actually contain a high measure of intellect, if any intellect at all given the definition of intellect.
No i said that i dont believe it fits the first definition as i explained in my post.Quote:
But it comes into definition 1 doesn't it? Since when was it that the majority of the definitions has to fit? And you do realize we are talking about a bot here right? Stating that a bot can't be called "Genius" is purely idiotic. Because after all it is a name.
Same goes for that, since when can an argument be retarded? Want to look up the definition of retarded in a dictionairy aswell? I'm just stating my point here.Quote:
No i said that i dont believe it fits the first definition as i explained in my post.
And you do realise that the only reason i replied to this retarded arguement is because you asked me to. :rolleyes: