[Unofficial] List of Legit / Scam COD Cheat Providers

Quote:

Originally Posted by cigol2018 You shouldn't even be on the list. your new cheat is down constantly and you even post announcements that it's ready but then when people buy it's disabled. down for weeks at a time. proof: your own discord. Why you are even on this list when you're a reseller too I will never understand in my life. takes 1 brain cell to realize what anti-cheats are going to do after detecting basic firmware (hint: they usually detect more advanced firmware next). clearly Ricochet is focused on dma fully now just like EAC and javelin which leaves a blind spot for exclusive externals.

Over the past two months, my software hasn't had any outages.
I don't understand where you're getting this information from.

Especially since we're one of the few providers to be back online quickly after a COD update.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laurent_ Over the past two months, my software hasn't had any outages. I don't understand where you're getting this information from. Especially since we're one of the few providers to be back online quickly after a COD update.

Your cheat is the exact same as aim master so who’s reselling who

Quote:

Originally Posted by Razorghost2 Your cheat is the exact same as aim master so who’s reselling who

I hadn't heard of AimMaster.
That said, I took a look at their Telegram channel and saw that their MW4 version was released after ours.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laurent_ I hadn't heard of AimMaster. That said, I took a look at their Telegram channel and saw that their MW4 version was released after ours.

Are you sure? Because the loaders are the same just different rebrands same with menu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laurent_ Over the past two months, my software hasn't had any outages. I don't understand where you're getting this information from. Especially since we're one of the few providers to be back online quickly after a COD update.

You had a lot of downtime with boostclient when you resold them. If you work with another dev now then I will say on record of this thread that my comments are about boostclient and when you resold them, not whoever you sell now.

Quote:

Originally Posted by cigol2018 You had a lot of downtime with boostclient when you resold them. If you work with another dev now then I will say on record of this thread that my comments are about boostclient and when you resold them, not whoever you sell now.

Well they are the exact same as aim master so I’m wondering are they themselves the devs (aim master) or also reselling

LMAO at all the retards who decided to use free firmware on COD. How did they even think they would ever remain unbanned? Saddest part is DMA firmware scene is such a scam as well, so all these kids are gonna get scammed buying some shitty firmware now.

Quote:

Originally Posted by cigol2018 Really private externals are always going to be the best for any game.

That's assuming you have a competent developer. Externals still pose so many detection vectors that when you really sit down and think about it, you're risking as much as an internal.

The render method is still a detection vector, the mouse driver is a detection vector and if they are loading the cheat itself with an unsigned driver that's also another detection vector? Not many externals are going to be selling you a cheat with a fully signed driver that's just outrageous to even think about. Of course its possible but that's like finding a needle in a haystack.

If they've managed to create their own hyper-visor, then yes it's gonna be pretty fucking safe by most anti-cheats, as long as their render method is smart.

Realistically, anyone in this community probably isn't actually involved in private external communities anyway. The COD scene thinks "ID verified" or "slot limit" means private, when that is not private at all.

If you're in one of the private communities that I'm thinking about then don't mention it by name on this section at least, they don't like that. I think its safe to mention in Fortnite & Rust sections

Quote:

Originally Posted by TransPrincess LMAO at all the retards who decided to use free firmware on COD. How did they even think they would ever remain unbanned? Saddest part is DMA firmware scene is such a scam as well, so all these kids are gonna get scammed buying some shitty firmware now. That's assuming you have a competent developer. Externals still pose so many detection vectors that when you really sit down and think about it, you're risking as much as an internal. The render method is still a detection vector, the mouse driver is a detection vector and if they are loading the cheat itself with an unsigned driver that's also another detection vector? Not many externals are going to be selling you a cheat with a fully signed driver that's just outrageous to even think about. Of course its possible but that's like finding a needle in a haystack. If they've managed to create their own hyper-visor, then yes it's gonna be pretty fucking safe by most anti-cheats, as long as their render method is smart. Realistically, anyone in this community probably isn't actually involved in private external communities anyway. The COD scene thinks "ID verified" or "slot limit" means private, when that is not private at all. If you're in one of the private communities that I'm thinking about then don't mention it by name on this section at least, they don't like that. I think its safe to mention in Fortnite & Rust sections

COD requires secure boot on which won't allow unsigned drivers to load. any cheat you see active today has or is abusing a signed driver in some way so no its not a needle in a haystack. As for hypervisor I think most of them just use hyperv instead of making their own which is harder than it sounds to detect if done properly. fecurity and softstack both use hyperv.

I think whats needle in haystack is quality firmware that isnt a scam and isnt about to get detected by ricochet during mw4. Id rather be over here while they are focused on dma. All im saying.

Respectfully disagree.

Quote:

Originally Posted by cigol2018 COD requires secure boot on which won't allow unsigned drivers to load. any cheat you see active today has or is abusing a signed driver in some way so no its not a needle in a haystack. .

thank you for clarifying. I thought due to most cheats needing core isolation off, that means they're abusing an unsigned driver or maybe I've misunderstood that for drivers that can be exploited then.

Maybe not a needle in a haystack, you're right but there are very few developers out there that I would trust on my main and the ones I trust work with core isolation on

Quote:

Originally Posted by TransPrincess thank you for clarifying. I thought due to most cheats needing core isolation off, that means they're abusing an unsigned driver or maybe I've misunderstood that for drivers that can be exploited then. Maybe not a needle in a haystack, you're right but there are very few developers out there that I would trust on my main.

Most of them require hvci off because they are abusing vulnerable signed drivers to manually map their unsigned driver. they usually just use kdmapper. so they do "have" a signed driver involved which is why it can load, then it maps their unsigned driver. doing this requires hvci off.

Youre completely right though, most every external or even internal dev around here probably knows less than their most knowledgeable customers at this point. Its a shitshow man.

The difficult choice and what we are basically politely discussing right now is what's worse trusting the firmware market as ricochet detects firmwares or trusting the external internal market :confused: scary times.

Quote:

Originally Posted by cigol2018 Most of them require hvci off because they are abusing vulnerable signed drivers to manually map their unsigned driver. they usually just use kdmapper. so they do "have" a signed driver involved which is why it can load, then it maps their unsigned driver. doing this requires hvci off. Youre completely right though, most every external or even internal dev around here probably knows less than their most knowledgeable customers at this point. Its a shitshow man. The difficult choice and what we are basically politely discussing right now is what's worse trusting the firmware market as ricochet detects firmwares or trusting the external internal market :confused: scary times.

Thank you so much for clarifying, that makes a lot more sense.

And yes you're right, at the end of the day both externals & DMA have their own detection vectors now. I think we can both agree in terms of 'aimbotting' HID will always be a lot more safer on the server level / AI analysis.

In regards to firmware, I totally agree. I'm probably being biased here since I know my firmware is different to a lot of other peoples but that's why I also initially said the firmware scene is a scam, so many people are gonna get scammed buying products you could just emulate from Amazon. You can legit emulate some USB devices for $20 then return it to Amazon in the 30 day period, but we have people selling that emulated firmware for $250. Completely crazy to even think about lol, basically drop shipping firmwares

Something I noticed (which you already mentioned), once games get involved in detecting DMA, they usually go balls deep and just focus on DMA and forget about everything else for quite awhile.. I've seen that in a few games now.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TransPrincess thank you for clarifying. I thought due to most cheats needing core isolation off, that means they're abusing an unsigned driver or maybe I've misunderstood that for drivers that can be exploited then. Maybe not a needle in a haystack, you're right but there are very few developers out there that I would trust on my main and the ones I trust work with core isolation on

btw for all these who are looking for a cheat that doesnt require hvci to be turned off you might want to take a look at advance :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by cigol2018 Most of them require hvci off because they are abusing vulnerable signed drivers to manually map their unsigned driver

Your statement is TOO generalized.
@[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] can we have some clarification?

IIRC - resellers are not allowed on the list, so whats NEXUP doing on it while being a reseller? ( first advance, then no name dev that left him, then Boostclient, and now god knows who again? )

I might be missing something obviously but I am pretty much sure I am right? ( no hate towards anybody obviously, just want to hear something about the whole situation )

Quote:

Originally Posted by L1ney btw for all these who are looking for a cheat that doesnt require hvci to be turned off you might want to take a look at advance :) Your statement is TOO generalized. @[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] can we have some clarification? IIRC - resellers are not allowed on the list, so whats NEXUP doing on it while being a reseller? ( first advance, then no name dev that left him, then Boostclient, and now god knows who again? ) I might be missing something obviously but I am pretty much sure I am right? ( no hate towards anybody obviously, just want to hear something about the whole situation )

Who is he reselling for?

I know Xenos previously had resellers with exclusive rights to sell certain products, such as Dexaim, but I see those have since been removed. Although, that could be due to their streak of detections.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 0x41^4 Who is he reselling for? I know Xenos previously had resellers with exclusive rights to sell certain products, such as Dexaim, but I see those have since been removed. Although, that could be due to their streak of detections.

as i said, NEXUP was first reselling us, then he dropped us and started reselling "BoostClient" as i understood correctly, now i have no idea what he resells nor i care, its just that i remember resellers arent allowed on the list, even if its a rebrand, thats why i brought the whole thing

Quote:

Originally Posted by L1ney as i said, NEXUP was first reselling us, then he dropped us and started reselling "BoostClient" as i understood correctly, now i have no idea what he resells nor i care, its just that i remember resellers arent allowed on the list, even if its a rebrand, thats why i brought the whole thing

Right, the simple point was that being on the list could mean he has exclusive rights to sell for a particular provider, as I already mentioned was the case with resellers listed in the past.

Which, if he does, I doubt he is going to say who it is.