Quote:
Originally Posted by CrazyGamerNetwork
I was able to mess with the coop.ini file to make the 6 bots giving me trouble work (the settings you aren't suppose to touch)
Maybe add some failsafes?
|
Yes I will check that :D I think you are speaking about some of the features are there and not finished like the autocoop.
I will try to simplify the coop.ini just by removing the extra stuff and clean some code.
I sometimes forget that other people also use this bot not only me :D
Quote:
Originally Posted by artyleria007
Got a question for ya guys:
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2640 (15M Cache, 2.50 GHz, 7.20 GT/s Intel® QPI) 6 cores, 12 threads 2.5 Ghz basic, up to 3.0 turbo
How many VM's can this proc run? I guess it easily holds 24 and how about 30? Is it better than i7-4770k(w/0 OC or clocked)?
Benchmark results says that this proc (talking bout basic clock) is like 5% better than 3770k and 5% worse than 4770k.
It's 6 true-cores tho.
Is it worth buying > i7 3770/k/4770/k?
I'm not sure about it but - what may be suprising - it can run up to 18 VM's (I'm not 100% sure about it tho, I don't remember if it was 4600 HD).
|
YEs you can run 18 vms with Intel HD 4000 that is the CPU GPU :p, but you notice some difference in terms of smooth of the PC :p
maybe with teh gamewindow mode and less resolution it helps for this lower end GPUS.
Benchmarks of CPUS often are tested not for this use (virtualization/vmware workstation) you must look for tests of multithreading, there is tools to test that.
Must of the benchmarks are about applications and most of them are singlethread applications.
Maybe you find more information about CPUS performance at Vmware foruns :p were people create a lot of virtual machines but often they are not for gaming :p but some are for graphics (3d Max) so who knows.
for me the performance for vms between i7 or xeon are basically the same, the difference its that xeon cant be overclocked and consumes less power and maybe could be a little cheaper :p
if you think in the future go with i7, you can resell later or use for other applications if you dont want to think on future and save power/electricity XEON its a good option.
12 threads cpu will handle between 30-36 vms.
often people just focus in number of vms and they dont check the number of refs per day.
what is important its refs per day and not number of vms...
Quote:
[00:39:12] nhcoohrh Amina: that is other thing
[00:39:19] nhcoohrh Amina: more vms doesnt mean more refs
[00:39:25] nhcoohrh Amina: i get often on 18 vms 50 refs 2
[00:39:26] nhcoohrh Amina: per day
[00:40:00] nhcoohrh Amina: but 48 vm machine does around 110-120 refs 2 per day
[00:41:20] Legendary Referrals: damn bandit blows lol. i get like 400 per day with ~ 250 VM
|
having a loop time short, run games without any stopage it's very important to get good results.
if you run 24 vms and do the same number of refs as running 18 vms, then I prefer go with 18 vms at least save power/cpu