^^ aGREEEDQuote:
Originally posted by pengpong@Jul 5 2005, 05:11
* Patch l2walker so that it takes "fail"-packets as "success"-packets
^^ aGREEEDQuote:
Originally posted by pengpong@Jul 5 2005, 05:11
* Patch l2walker so that it takes "fail"-packets as "success"-packets
Although this would be easier to do (relatively), it is still very difficult and the solution would be temporary. Is it worth it to work on this for two weeks and have it work for only a couple days before they change their method?Quote:
Patch l2walker so that it takes "fail"-packets as "success"-packets
yes & noQuote:
Originally posted by blahboy123@Jul 5 2005, 19:32
Although this would be easier to do (relatively), it is still very difficult and the solution would be temporary. Is it worth it to work on this for two weeks and have it work for only a couple days before they change their method?
.....
Yes, but you wouldnt need to patch every version. Keep version 10.4.2 for example, until it breaks for some reason and then do the same for next one. I am sure we can get 3-4 good months out of it.Quote:
If they change the encryption in a future version of l2walker, you have to reverse engineer the encryption again which should be harder than to patch every single version of l2walker. (--> writing a new verification server)
So, they do not have a method as of yet.Quote:
This post is just to note to everyone that we are aware of the changes to L2Walker making the P2P Fix unusable and are working on finding more methods and devices to fulfill your botting needs. ************* will deliver satisfaction.