Quote:
Originally Posted by theminkman
TPM is not required to be disabled, fTPM is yes.
"also you are missing a EDID for a device that is on everyones motherboard"
Are you referring to integrated graphics? that is on your CPU not motherboard on modern systems.
"also are you sure the ethernet adapters mentioned on your list wont leak your ARP table?"
I'm not worried about ARP tables but we are adding an updated guide on gitbook soon that will cover ARP table and routers that supports it
Sorry for offending the spoofer you are re-selling for 50 euro that is always detected
|
I am not reselling anything, I am just defending someone that has a proven track record in recent times. The point is we are sharing info that isnt based on experience, but hard evidence coming from reversing EAC. Sitting here and claiming anything without that type of evidence to back it up is stupid imo. You are spreading a mindset that is wildly misleading, all decent anti cheats build their solutions to combat bruteforcing / trial and error attempts to get around their checks. Just because something works and isn't getting you banned, does not mean it is correct. The only way to verify anything is looking at a anti cheats behavior and what they are collecting (RE). EAC does collect more then what they straight up ban for
EAC is directly querying for the ARP table, so they can use it if they want. With the mindset you have, shouldn't you be ultra worried about this?
Dont take this as a personal insult, I am just challenging you on the information you are providing, since you are so quick to do it to other people.
Edit to your update
Here is the difference mentioned before, I am actually verifiying this information instead of just looking at public knowledge. I won't make a claim that I can't back up. And yes i did have a breakpoint in the wrong place, the actual IOCTLs EAC is querying for tpm is 22C01C (tpm version) and 22C00C (get tpm)