[Open-Source] Virtual Conquer

07/24/2010 00:07 copz1337#61
Looks like this is messed up.
07/24/2010 13:52 Basser#62
I still prefer the new one.
You have to keep 1 thing in mind;
This source is not like all the other public sources so far, this source is a real open-source project, it is not intended to be modified, but to be extended.
You should extend it by adding things, not modify the core.
Besides, you call this messy, but please explain what exactly.
Maybe I'm blind, or perhaps I can't see it because I wrote it, I am willing to try to make it 'tidier', but I will need help.
07/25/2010 20:26 _tao4229_#63
Having a mess of lots of files is just in some peoples styles of coding. Some people think its neat, others say they can't find anything.

Whenever I have a project that will require 10,000+ lines of code, I'd prefer to have 50+ files to distribute that rather than 5-10. Perhaps I learned it from hybrid, but I'd rather have a shitton of files (as long as they're properly in a shitton of folders) than very few. Can't say what this is compared to the old source, as I didn't even look at the old one.
07/25/2010 20:57 _DreadNought_#64
Agree with _tao4229 there.
07/25/2010 21:53 Nullable#65
This server is very complicated (messy?) from the viewpoint of a newbie, or even anyone who doesn't experiment with the language much (especially LINQ) and it looks like you're learning more and setting goals for yourself as you go on which is really admirable, but the bottom line is, this should never be open-source unless you provide 'easy-to-use' API.

You've been here long enough to figure out that open-source here == really easy stuff (more of shit too) to use, nothing fancy or no-one will ever understand it.

Don't get me wrong, I really like it but this won't work here, plus code-complexity doesn't always mean efficiency.

I know that you believe you can change the way people think about programming a server around here, but you know it will never happen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Basser View Post
I still prefer the new one.
You have to keep 1 thing in mind;
This source is not like all the other public sources so far, this source is a real open-source project, it is not intended to be modified, but to be extended.
You should extend it by adding things, not modify the core.
Besides, you call this messy, but please explain what exactly.
Maybe I'm blind, or perhaps I can't see it because I wrote it, I am willing to try to make it 'tidier', but I will need help.
07/26/2010 11:59 chickmagnet#66
the sgl doesnt wonna execute
07/26/2010 14:16 ~Yuki~#67
coz it MSSQL not MYSQL -_-

EDIT: Your name.... Imature...
07/26/2010 15:54 chickmagnet#68
Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Yuki~ View Post
coz it MSSQL not MYSQL -_-

EDIT: Your name.... Imature...
how 2 use mssgl?
07/26/2010 16:02 Korvacs#69
Google MsSQL setup.
07/28/2010 18:05 Basser#70
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nullable View Post
This server is very complicated (messy?) from the viewpoint of a newbie, or even anyone who doesn't experiment with the language much (especially LINQ) and it looks like you're learning more and setting goals for yourself as you go on which is really admirable, but the bottom line is, this should never be open-source unless you provide 'easy-to-use' API.

You've been here long enough to figure out that open-source here == really easy stuff (more of shit too) to use, nothing fancy or no-one will ever understand it.

Don't get me wrong, I really like it but this won't work here, plus code-complexity doesn't always mean efficiency.

I know that you believe you can change the way people think about programming a server around here, but you know it will never happen.
Honoustly, I did realize what you just said about 1 week ago, but I didn't care, since I feel like this is useful to a few, people who actually do want to study things. I do rather share it to a group of people only, and send it to those who will actually take a look at it, and see if there's anything I need to modify.

Thanks for this post, it also confirms my thoughts about you. (in a positive way!)
08/03/2010 12:34 Korvacs#71
Closed @ OP's request.