Stop stop stop, let's stop, you're trying to destroy made-up theses.
Let's go through the order -
1) Very convenient and tight wording - "may cause problems."
What are the problems, how serious, etc., there is no specifics, there is a feeling that you yourself do not know the behavior of your software on builds above 22h2. And that's why you're using a very abstract formulation.
It's like I came to the casino, maybe I'll win or maybe not, it's not normal for people who provide services and their product.
There should be a warning that on new versions of win 11, the software does not behave stably and unpredictably, so the developer will not be able to guarantee anything AT ALL.
"I don't understand why you expected it to work flawlessly," do not distort my words, I understood that the application is not stable, feel the difference between "it does not work stably" and "the software does not work at all"
And the whole problem is due to the inaccurate wording, you have every item for each case written in the FAQ during the refand, so that later, if anything, you can refer to the paragraph of the rules that would accurately describe this or that case.
2.3) Next, you talk about the speed of the support response and the fact that help was provided on your part. Did I say something bad about the speed of the support response, about the quality of the support, in the last message, on the contrary, I said thank you (to the entire support team) for trying to help me and I did not blame a single person from the support, it is in my message, reread, because it is not very clear what this thesis is about What are you trying to argue or refute ?
With the fact that I lost 4 hours of my time? So it's not because of the support work, but because of a piece of broken code.
4) There was no HWID error, besides, I do not understand how the disk id could have changed at the recovery point. At this point, I was more confused by the logic of the program, as you know, we only have two ways to verify the key and give the data to the user, either locally or by transferring it to the server and returning the response to the client. And maybe ( my assumptions ) that the check is carried out on the server side and for some reason the server returns to me that the key is not liquid or something like that , although I did not change any data , did not use a spoofer , etc. Which means either this is a bug, or the server is tied to some other parameters that may not be reliable, which causes an error.
Further, I did not insult any person (if I do not confuse anything), I just said that this is a piece of shitty code that does not work and they also charge money for it, that's all. I just expressed my subjective opinion about the product for which I paid my money, that's all, arguing with a subjective opinion is at least strange.
Result
You tried to break up non-existing theses with your arguments, without bothering to read and UNDERSTAND either my last message in the ticket or my comment.
And since you haven't really read the essence of my messages, I'll emphasize here again - I RECOMMEND this product for people who have win 11 22h2 and below.
Therefore, I only hope that you will try to read the set of English letters and symbols more thoughtfully
