[Unofficial] List of Legit / Scam COD Cheat Providers

Quote:

Originally Posted by lukedorian For me it took 4 days after SS and crooked got back to get campaigned.

Then i will wait 96 hours before any seen the video and the conclusion should be done from that, atm (After 5hours) the account still isn't banned.

Quote:

Originally Posted by lort1234 "According to people that have tested it and have gotten shadow banned, they got it from using it a few hours. Yes shadowban can happen days/weeks after using a cheat, but i honestly find that hard to be the case here. Zebleer also agreed that +3 hours of ingame time + playing a game, would be enough to determine if it is undetected or detected. But ofc i can wait a couple of days before showing anyone any footage of the session and see if the account get banned at that point, waiting +weeks isn't realistic though.

what am i trying to say that you can`t tell that something is detected or not in 3 hours

Quote:

Originally Posted by L1ney what am i trying to say that you can`t tell that something is detected or not in 3 hours

Well u usually can, but sure we can wait 96 hours, that should be more than enough time to let the account cook and see if it gets banned.

I highly doubt it since Zebleer made a test and he got campaign banned after just a few hours of using AimMaster he said.

Quote:

Originally Posted by lort1234 Well u usually can, but sure we can wait 96 hours, that should be more than enough time to let the account cook and see if it gets banned. I highly doubt it since Zebleer made a test and he got campaign banned after just a few hours of using AimMaster he said.

well you usually can`t and since you are legit cheats list creator in rust section with game that uses EAC you actually are supposed to know this very well

Quote:

Originally Posted by L1ney well you usually can`t and since you are legit cheats list creator in rust section with game that uses EAC you actually are supposed to know this very well

1. The last time I used any cheat is cod was more than a year ago, so things might have changed, but at that time if a provider was detected and you injected it, you would get shadowbanned within a game or two, so you couldn’t ruin the fun and game for others. (Also to limited rage cheaters).

2. EAC and Ricochet is two completely different anti-cheats, and as a provider you should also know about this, whatever is “normal” behaviour for Ricochet isn’t normal behaviour for EAC, and not even EAC for rust, but EAC can be completely different depending on the game.

3. As I already said, Zebleer said he got banned within hours of using AimMaster, another user said he got banned within 4 days of using 2 other providers, waiting 4 days to make any final conclusion can be done, but waiting weeks isn’t fair for any provider to determine their status, in those weeks the status can change as we see it right now with many providers.

4. If weeks are necessary to determine the status of a provider, I believe it should be a standard process and be done to all providers (Also the ones with undetected status atm) but I believe that’s unnecessary.

Quote:

Originally Posted by lort1234 1. The last time I used any cheat is cod was more than a year ago, so things might have changed, but at that time if a provider was detected and you injected it, you would get shadowbanned within a game or two, so you couldn’t ruin the fun and game for others. (Also to limited rage cheaters). 2. EAC and Ricochet is two completely different anti-cheats, and as a provider you should also know about this, whatever is “normal” behaviour for Ricochet isn’t normal behaviour for EAC, and not even EAC for rust, but EAC can be completely different depending on the game. 3. As I already said, Zebleer said he got banned within hours of using AimMaster, another user said he got banned within 4 days of using 2 other providers, waiting 4 days to make any final conclusion can be done, but waiting weeks isn’t fair for any provider to determine their status, in those weeks the status can change as we see it right now with many providers. 4. If weeks are necessary to determine the status of a provider, I believe it should be a standard process and be done to all providers (Also the ones with undetected status atm) but I believe that’s unnecessary.

literally every anti cheat i ever dealt with ( EAC, BE, RICOCHET, EAAC ) will NOT ban you in a few hours even if you are absolutely detected by it, fastest one was EAAC when i was getting banned exactly on the next day since last injection, and other was ricochet that was a little bit similar ( instead of banning you it will put you in SB and when you get in SB game you will be slapped into the fucking floor, even tho its not happening now )
its obviously done even by retarded AC`s because otherwise cheat devs will literally be able to fix their detection by brute force.

anyways, if you want to know surely if they are dtc or not, you should do the process you did like every day in straight 2 weeks

Quote:

Originally Posted by L1ney literally every anti cheat i ever dealt with ( EAC, BE, RICOCHET, EAAC ) will NOT ban you in a few hours even if you are absolutely detected by it, fastest one was EAAC when i was getting banned exactly on the next day since last injection, and other was ricochet that was a little bit similar ( instead of banning you it will put you in SB and when you get in SB game you will be slapped into the fucking floor, even tho its not happening now ) its obviously done even by retarded AC`s because otherwise cheat devs will literally be able to fix their detection by brute force. anyways, if you want to know surely if they are dtc or not, you should do the process you did like every day in straight 2 weeks

Then I honestly believe you have no idea of what you are doing dealing with EAC, because I can’t count how many times I have used a detected cheat and gotten banned within hours, even when testing to see if the cheat is detected, it all usually happens within a couple of hours.

Quote:

Originally Posted by lort1234 Then I honestly believe you have no idea of what you are doing dealing with EAC, because I can’t count how many times I have used a detected cheat and gotten banned within hours, even when testing to see if the cheat is detected, it all usually happens within a couple of hours.

the cheat you have been using then got to be absolutely fucking pasted with 2000 uc pasters that use same sig scanned code and methods as the cheat you tested, might be the only reason for it

Quote:

Originally Posted by L1ney literally every anti cheat i ever dealt with ( EAC, BE, RICOCHET, EAAC ) will NOT ban you in a few hours even if you are absolutely detected by it, fastest one was EAAC when i was getting banned exactly on the next day since last injection, and other was ricochet that was a little bit similar ( instead of banning you it will put you in SB and when you get in SB game you will be slapped into the fucking floor, even tho its not happening now ) its obviously done even by retarded AC`s because otherwise cheat devs will literally be able to fix their detection by brute force. anyways, if you want to know surely if they are dtc or not, you should do the process you did like every day in straight 2 weeks

I don't want to argue with you or Zebleer or other sellers that keep claiming our detection because its only sellers and very shady accounts doing that. Didn't even expect Zebleer to bother with it (he is even dming our customers privately and telling them we are detected while they tell him they are not getting banned at all, I have screenshots from him messaging our customer and explaining him how detection works and how to test our cheat properly while our user is literally using it daily and telling him so)

What is more interesting no one even yourself would dare to question those freshly made 05/2025 accounts posting accusations without proof but instantly come to prove wrong reputable accounts saying they simply not getting banned with cheat that is undetected? Why don't you question those brand new accounts as well? Why don't you and others ever ask them for proof for accusations? But reputable accounts are required to post video or other proof that they actually test cheat? Lmao double standards and sellers vs aimmaster at its fines. On top of that Xenos - 30 perm bans within hours = rager ban wave and aimmaster 1 ban = status change.
@[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] and other reputable accounts testing and seeing truth are shills, brand new accounts and other sellers attacking me are honest cheat reviewers working for good of community

Why are you 2 even bothering with me? 1 went private and then closed p2c after short time. You got detected basically every season update, then got CnD after few months of initial release and still down?

Quote:

Originally Posted by L1ney the cheat you have been using then got to be absolutely fucking pasted with 2000 uc pasters that use same sig scanned code and methods as the cheat you tested, might be the only reason for it

Sure, that's why you have working cheats for other EAC protected games that are undetected right? How many times was it that your BF2042 cheat have been detected? And how long have it been so now? For your information, BF2042 uses a "worse" version of EAC than rust does, so you should probably stay away from making any "product" for rust.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Krad3z3 I don't want to argue with you or Zebleer or other sellers that keep claiming our detection because its only sellers and very shady accounts doing that. Didn't even expect Zebleer to bother with it (he is even dming our customers privately and telling them we are detected while they tell him they are not getting banned at all, I have screenshots from him messaging our customer and explaining him how detection works and how to test our cheat properly while our user is literally using it daily and telling him so) What is more interesting no one even yourself would dare to question those freshly made 05/2025 accounts posting accusations without proof but instantly come to prove wrong reputable accounts saying they simply not getting banned with cheat that is undetected? Why don't you question those brand new accounts as well? Why don't you and others ever ask them for proof for accusations? But reputable accounts are required to post video or other proof that they actually test cheat? Lmao double standards and sellers vs aimmaster at its fines. On top of that Xenos - 30 perm bans within hours = rager ban wave and aimmaster 1 ban = status change. @[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] and other reputable accounts testing and seeing truth are shills, brand new accounts and other sellers attacking me are honest cheat reviewers working for good of community

i will say again i do not accuse or defend anybody i literally don`t care if you or any other cheat got detected i just expressed my opinion

Quote:

Originally Posted by lort1234 Sure, that's why you have working cheats for other EAC protected games that are undetected right? How many times was it that your BF2042 cheat have been detected? And how long have it been so now? For your information, BF2042 uses a "worse" version of EAC than rust does, so you should probably stay away from making any "product" for rust.

yeah BF2042 use EAAC ( EA AC which was recently renamed to something else ion remember + don`t care ) that has nothing to do with EAC ( EASY ANTI CHEAT ), my BF2042 got detected twice when both detections were manual targeting by AC developers ( which is not surprising when there is only 1-2 p2cs left and we are one of them ) so i`m not really sure what is the point of your statement, and since i wasted enough time already its time to leave so everybody have a nice evening

Quote:

Originally Posted by L1ney i will say again i do not accuse or defend anybody i literally don`t care if you or any other cheat got detected i just expressed my opinion

And that's fair enough, but don't try to indicate that i don't know what i am talking about (especially when talking about rust/eac). There was 0 reason to go after the man.

Quote:

Originally Posted by lort1234 And that's fair enough, but don't try to indicate that i don't know what i am talking about (especially when talking about rust/eac). There was 0 reason to go after the man.

i didn`t try to say that you have no clue what are you talking about i was just surprised that you thought that 3 hours will be enough to understand if some cheat is dtc is not.
the other thing is, since i have no clue how aimmaster security works and what kind of methods they are using, i can assume that if some of their members are receiving bans while being spoofed and not raging when others dont, there might be a slight chance that ac detected something specific at specific timing in specific moment on specific frame of specific data that are triggered very rare or only between some x amount of users that can lead to ban of their accounts, OR AC simply doesn`t ban everybody to confuse Aimmaster developers ( which is surely possible too ) and its not like they exactly are doing this against Aimmaster, but against any other p2c

plus let`s do not forget that modern AC do not fire all their detection methods/vectors at once, some check can be triggered on one account instantly, while on other accounts it might trigger much less frequently, or under certain conditions.

Quote:

Originally Posted by L1ney i didn`t try to say that you have no clue what are you talking about i was just surprised that you thought that 3 hours will be enough to understand if some cheat is dtc is not. the other thing is, since i have no clue how aimmaster security works and what kind of methods they are using, i can assume that if some of their members are receiving bans while being spoofed and not raging when others dont, there might be a slight chance that ac detected something specific at specific timing in specific moment on specific frame of specific data that are triggered very rare or only between some x amount of users that can lead to ban of their accounts, OR AC simply doesn`t ban everybody to confuse Aimmaster developers ( which is surely possible too ) and its not like they exactly are doing this against Aimmaster, but against any other p2c plus let`s do not forget that modern AC do not fire all their detection methods/vectors at once, some check can be triggered on one account instantly, while on other accounts it might trigger much less frequently, or under certain conditions.

I believe 3 hours of playing would be enough to determine if a provider is outright detected, whatever the case might else be is very hard to say, but as i said i believe it's unreasonable and unnessecary to wait weeks to determine if any provider is detected or not. I have already said that 96 hours and be done without anyone seeing any of the session footage and then first after that make a final statement.

How EAC works i won't go into, as it have no relevance for this conversation, i only wanted to point out you "flaws" in your earlier statement.

Yes the AC could indeed trigger because of a specific feature, setting, config or just only target "some" people or target "all" over time, but this being the case i find hard to believe because of how much Ricochet just want to simply get rid of the cheaters, otherwise people would be able to semi/rage for days/weeks before anything happens, this is as far as i know, strongly not what Ricochet. But i might be wrong.

Quote:

Originally Posted by lort1234 Then i will wait 96 hours before any seen the video and the conclusion should be done from that, atm (After 5hours) the account still isn't banned.

I don´t think aim master is detected, just because 2 or 3 ban reports, haven´t tryed it since it hasn´t controller support