War Rock Cheat Programming Discussion

05/20/2014 06:16 Laszl0w#721
#req
cPlayerInfo struct.
05/21/2014 13:57 Nik0815MC#722
#request undetected hook
05/21/2014 15:53 dafuq1234567#723
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nik0815MC View Post
#request undetected hook
rly? :handsdown:
05/30/2014 21:46 AmazingTurtle#724
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] // this is how an itemchange handler should look like (6th slot change missing yet)
05/31/2014 00:19 ToxicData#725
Quote:
Originally Posted by /bin/cat View Post
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] // this is how an itemchange handler should look like (6th slot change missing yet)
Ugly code.
06/02/2014 11:02 AmazingTurtle#726

Lots of magic behind this :D
06/02/2014 11:07 Abendstern#727
Bräuchte auch mal die Scope AD
06/08/2014 14:37 HeroTreak#728
I have a question... This is undeteced detour: ??
Code:
LPVOID DetourCreate(PBYTE pbTargetFunction, PBYTE pbDetourFunction, INT intSize)
{
        DWORD dwProtect;
        PBYTE pbDetour = (PBYTE) malloc(intSize + 5);
        INT i;
 
        VirtualProtect(pbTargetFunction, intSize, PAGE_EXECUTE_READWRITE, &dwProtect);
        memcpy(pbDetour, pbTargetFunction, intSize);
        pbDetour += intSize;
 
        *(BYTE *) (pbDetour + 0) = 0xCB + 30;
        *(DWORD *) (pbDetour + 1) = (DWORD) (pbTargetFunction + intSize - pbDetour) - 5;
        *(BYTE *) (pbTargetFunction + 0) = 0xB8;
        *(DWORD *) (pbTargetFunction + 1) = (DWORD) (pbDetourFunction);
        *(WORD *) (pbTargetFunction + 5) = 0xE0FF;
        i = 7;
 
        for (; i < intSize; i++)
                *(BYTE *) (pbTargetFunction + i) = 0x68 + 40;
 
        VirtualProtect(pbTargetFunction, intSize, dwProtect, &dwProtect);
 
        return (pbDetour - intSize);
}
Request addys.

Dump by HeroTreak
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
Scan:
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
06/08/2014 18:50 NikM#729
Depends on the usage.
But what is the sense of adding 2 constants instead of just writing the result ?
0xCB + 30 = 0xE9
0x68 + 40 = 0x90
06/08/2014 19:26 MRx86™#730
Quote:
Originally Posted by NikM View Post
Depends on the usage.
But what is the sense of adding 2 constants instead of just writing the result ?
0xCB + 30 = 0xE9
0x68 + 40 = 0x90
to be pro 1337 and saying i'm using pro detour with byte CB + 30 XD
that has a sense xD
06/08/2014 21:29 +Yazzn#731
This detour just has to be from King7 :D
06/08/2014 22:10 MRx86™#732
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter File View Post
This detour just has to be from King7 :D
yes! 100%! how did u know?
06/09/2014 11:33 GraFixPL#733
Bypass CRC now work?
06/09/2014 15:18 hero9910#734
Quote:
Originally Posted by 22jays22 View Post
yes! 100%! how did u know?
cause it's crap
06/09/2014 16:35 MRx86™#735
Quote:
Originally Posted by hero9910 View Post
cause it's crap
i understand bro!

but its seems to be code from croner ^^