I've 99% finished making the HAT values reflect the actual performance of the car.
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] thread from 2013 with Gigaxero's performance test routine and results was a goldmine.
Some values are missing or marked in red font as invalid.
Go ahead and take a look - once I have filled the missing stuff (Lotus Cortina, looking at you!), I'll probably make a attributes.bin which gives the cars consistent HAT values.
I think you'll like the old HAT vs. new HAT comparison. 33 cars changed class (most to a lower one) as a result.
The prize for most overrated car goes to BMW M6 (both variants), the prize for most underrated car - to Lotus Exige.
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] thread from 2013 with Gigaxero's performance test routine and results was a goldmine.
Some values are missing or marked in red font as invalid.
Go ahead and take a look - once I have filled the missing stuff (Lotus Cortina, looking at you!), I'll probably make a attributes.bin which gives the cars consistent HAT values.
I think you'll like the old HAT vs. new HAT comparison. 33 cars changed class (most to a lower one) as a result.
The prize for most overrated car goes to BMW M6 (both variants), the prize for most underrated car - to Lotus Exige.