Quote:
Originally Posted by Tw3ak
You will go to bj using this or lats clients it doesn't matter. There is no nulling there doing to client that will prevent the way TQ is detecting cooperative because there detecting the bot itself not the bot thru the client. And no reshacker bs that people are using on cooperative claiming will stop it from being detected will matter either lol there not detecting cooperative by it's name and i'm kinda surprised nobody else has figured that out yet and how tq is really detecting it lol.
Using these so called nulled clients might prevent bj from autoclickers and pixelbots and such but using cooperative ya might as well just live with the fact it's going to be detected everytime until hawt figures out the obvious on why coop is being detected.
|
I believe you're right; it's a problem in COoperative itself, because not only is no information about your processes, accounts, etc. sent, but this information isn't even collected in my client. Plus, the only reports I've gotten from botjailing are from users of COoperative.
Although these clients are *somewhat* trial and error... I may have messed up.
Edit: Yes, Martin has assured me that information IS sent with my client. He also helped me discover a new anti-bot dll, which I'll work on fully cracking ASAP.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vecko12
:) LoL....
With mine or lats multi the TQ/CO2 scanner is REMOVED
1) There is a code that call tq scanner (e.g. Call.blablabla)
2) There is code (opcode) that can MAKE the conquer.exe to JUMP that call (conquer.exe will think that the scan is made succefully)
And that JUMP code is MADE in ours (mine and lateralus) MULTI CLIENTS...
Understood?
|
Oh how you're so very wrong. More proof that you stole my client. There is no such scan. Instead, there are many (100 or so?) anti-bot functions that you have to individually detect and work around, by rigorously searching for called "suspicious" functions, text strings, and a few known constants, that would take even the people who know exactly what to look for attempting this at LEAST 4 hours to pull off successfully without debugging (yes, this is why I'm so anal about people stealing my client; if you would truly understand how much work this is, you'd respect it and NOT STEAL MY WORK). Also, to "nullify" these functions most of the time requires much more than changing a jump if xxx instruction to a jump always. You don't know what you're talking about. Stop giving wrong information.