Quote:
Originally Posted by RakeshMonkee
ARP would be useless if the client device was on its own subnet away from every other devices. Would be a good way to catch cheaters who are too lazy to install openwrt or Pfsense(depending on the hardware) and configure the network.
Would it be possible to block the ARP requests that EAC send?
|
Agreed on the first part. That's why people do that to dodge flags from VGK, Faceit and in some cases FN. Hell i've been using it to dodge VGK's TPM enforcement combined with raid0 for like 2 years lol. Now they've obviously improved a lot, but when they first introduced the whole TPM stuff, it was as simple as spoofing, raid0, flash & arp change. 0 TPM/SB restrictions lol. Pretty sure it even still works to this day.
As for the latter, that's outside my experience range tbh. I have no clue if that's possible.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SauceMachine
Didn't do everything correct then. There is more to this than it was a few months ago.
There is no ARP query from EAC's side.
|
Good to know, didn't think so in the first place, but figured it was worth noting.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lort1234
I think it would cause too many false bans if they started banning ARP.
ISP providers usually only rent routers, so the same router is likely to be shared between multiple homes.
|
I've personally been banned on a completely new setup with nothing being the same, except my router. That was just around the time VGK introduced ARP flags.
Some AC's definitely flag/ban it, but it is fairly simple to bypass. As for the worry regarding ISP routers. I'd imagine it'd be much more accurate to grab the whole table & using that, vice versa just getting the routers mac.