Quote:
Originally Posted by 0x41^4
Two negatives make a positive.
An outside person (nonrepresentative of an owned organization), attempting to ruin a business is an external threat, as they are an outside entity and acting against it.
Internal = in
External = out
Tell that to any victim of a crime committed in public [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...].
Having mental health issues does not exempt you from facing consequences.
Yeah, @ [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...], why on earth would you risk jail time over someone actively trying to destroy your livelihood and means of existence?
The most comical part of this entire post is that all of the states mentioned have Stand Your Ground laws, which provide legal justification for using lethal force in defense of one’s property (business included) against an aggressor. |
I knew someone would say that, and I was going to add more context, but I assumed you’d apply security concepts to cheat developers. Let me clarify what I meant so I don’t look dumb, lol.
I referred to “Lucas” as an internal threat because, while he isn’t officially employed, he still had access to private files like executables and sensitive information that weren’t meant to be shared. By having that level of trust and access within the community, he essentially became an internal risk.
On the other hand, if your statement is true, then the entity/Lucas wouldn’t have had access to these files and loaders in the first place. But then the question becomes. how did he get the loader or how did he know security settings needed to mess sh up? Once again, it came from another internal threat/telegram. That’s the concept I was getting at.
this isn’t a traditional real world security infrastructure, but given the circumstances, it makes sense to classify him as internal. It’s less about strict definitions and more about the role he played. That’s all I was tryna say
Wait, what. I’m tripping. I never said he was external?
You tryna gaslight me bro����
I just reread what you said and noticed this statement:
'The most comical part of this entire post is that all of the states mentioned have Stand Your Ground laws, which provide legal justification for using lethal force in defense of one’s property (business included) against an aggressor.'
No idea where you got that from, bro. Cyber is completely different from physical. That aside, everyone has their opinions. I was just pointing out the legality of it all.