[INFORMATION] SQL Injection (ingame)

09/13/2016 02:57 whyt3boi#46
Thank you Megamax and everyone alike. For providing to the community still after all this time.
09/15/2016 19:44 legendarynacar#47
@[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] Did you fix it on Zyain Current Beta ?
09/16/2016 23:32 B1Q#48
Quote:
Originally Posted by ​Goofie​ View Post
I do not store all opcodes in my new source.

Also you are using recoded k-Guard? are you fucking kidding me?
why y using k-guard pls use mi syprmek
09/17/2016 12:23 ​Goofie​#49
Quote:
Originally Posted by hazemooking View Post
why y using k-guard pls use mi syprmek
Actually supermike is SROprot source, but k-guard is just aids.
09/17/2016 13:42 AceSpace#50
Quote:
Originally Posted by ​Goofie​ View Post
Actually supermike is SROprot source, but k-guard is just aids.
K-Guard is SROGuard's source but modified a little. I don't know why is it hard to create something from scratch.. weird tho shit still works.
09/17/2016 14:18 B1Q#51
Quote:
Originally Posted by Locklyon View Post
K-Guard is SROGuard's source but modified a little. I don't know why is it hard to create something from scratch.. weird tho shit still works.
just like you said it's not hard to create something from scratch... stop copying Chernobyl's sources and create your shit from scratch :3
09/17/2016 14:21 AceSpace#52
Quote:
Originally Posted by hazemooking View Post
just like you said it's not hard to create something from scratch... stop copying Chernobyl's sources and create your shit from scratch :3
Prove that I copied Chernobyl's.
09/17/2016 18:40 ​Goofie​#53
Quote:
Originally Posted by Locklyon View Post
K-Guard is SROGuard's source but modified a little. I don't know why is it hard to create something from scratch.. weird tho shit still works.
Why should u create something from scratch when you can fix the current issue that the source has? Save time = save money.

Win-win easy game no Q_Q :rolleyes:
09/17/2016 21:39 AceSpace#54
Quote:
Originally Posted by ​Goofie​ View Post
Why should u create something from scratch when you can fix the current issue that the source has? Save time = save money.

Win-win easy game no Q_Q :rolleyes:
Fixing a bad source is idiotic, creating a good one is easier. But yes, you can always have something that works at a low cost.
09/17/2016 23:14 B1Q#55
Quote:
Originally Posted by Locklyon View Post
Fixing a bad source is idiotic, creating a good one is easier. But yes, you can always have something that works at a low cost.
:) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :)
09/18/2016 10:17 LastThief*#56
Building from scratch is fucking idiotic to be honest, do not re-invent the wheel, if it works it works.
09/18/2016 14:30 ​Goofie​#57
Quote:
Originally Posted by LastThief* View Post
Building from scratch is fucking idiotic to be honest, do not re-invent the wheel, if it works it works.
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
09/18/2016 15:11 AceSpace#58
Quote:
Originally Posted by LastThief* View Post
Building from scratch is fucking idiotic to be honest, do not re-invent the wheel, if it works it works.
Yeah by putting packets and changing the name and yet it'll perform a lil better so it's still shit, you know what I mean. But who cares, 99% of the filters in SRO are actually re-coded filters.
09/18/2016 15:49 Qynchou#59
All this drama, I feel like Im back in 2010.

feelsgoodman.jpeg
09/18/2016 16:18 Timlock#60
Quote:
Originally Posted by LastThief* View Post
Building from scratch is fucking idiotic to be honest, do not re-invent the wheel, if it works it works.
I did that....