Quote:
Originally posted by 3t3rnal+May 21 2007, 16:30--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (3t3rnal @ May 21 2007, 16:30)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:
Originally posted by -ckyisasom@May 21 2007, 17:56
<!--QuoteBegin--3t3rnal
|
Quote:
@May 12 2007, 06:29
there is no need to use sm while using isrobot...& if u dont know sm is crack to make isrobot free, but gay 0x33 also charges ppl for sm
u just replace the sro_client.exe w/ the modded 1 from [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] & use the isrobot 1.62.
|
We are not gay sir.
You shouldn't be like that.
We're as fair a community as any other, it's YOU LEAKERS that are going to make it impossible to bot for free, because EVERY TIME a new leaked version comes out, you guys force bot369 to add more security to their bots, so don't call us the unfair ones, when we all have to pay for botcards because of you leakers, then you can call your own community gay.
|
LOL?, i wouldn't mind becoming a private member of 0x33, but sadly applications are fuking closed 99.99% of the time, & I hate writing up a resume just so i can bot :rolleyes:
stfu plz ^^ [/b][/quote]
amen...OPEN APPLICATIONS/ACTUALLY FEASIBLE TO BECOME A MEMBER=NO LEAKING!
Now why can 0x33 guys figure that one out?? NONE OF US WANT bot369 to add more security and make the softmod not work, but if we suck 0x33 dick and still can't become a member, then fuck that. You may relay to clockwork, if he isn't reading this, that NONE OF US WOULD LEEK if we could actually, by some miracle of GOD, become a private member of his forums!
Not only is this practice hypocrisy, but also it could be considered "digging your own grave"!