EngineOwning

Quote:

Originally Posted by billycock all i gotta say is, EO has gotten many accounts of mine perm banned. Ban waves every few months. Updates were slow 50% of the time. How ever they usually always gave comp. Using eo for months, maybe a year on end for ranked wz. And all i can say is, i wish i used another provider at that time. i was always told to get po, but EO price was too good and so was the comp. Price good, telegram filled npcs , Ban waves every few months. my first ban was like after 2 months of use, Maybe 3. Walls and unlock only. I NEVER used aimbot nor No Recoil. Just walls and unlocker also still atm I'm looking for a good provider, as PO is not public no more.

Quote:

Originally Posted by EngineOwning When you have managed to actually provide evidence for your statement "internets most detected public COD provider", I might read the rest of your energetic posts, check if the detection dates you posted are even accurate and properly answer you :pepeclown: Please go ahead and research all the detections of other public providers and list them so they can be compared, altough I have some doubts whether that's even possible for all competitors. You should also provide important context about specific detections for all providers, for example if a detection affected a very small percentage of the user base.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OPgamingCHAIR Interesting, When I google EO nothing shows for their actual website except a re-seller website as the first result. with that said I can now paint a more accurate picture on their lackluster detection history MW3/WZ Detections September 2024 - Detected August 2024 - Detected x2 Full cheat and Lite Version July 2024 - Detected May 2024 - Detected x2 April 2024 - Detected April 2024 - Spoofer Detected MW2/WZ Detections August 2023 - Detected MW19/WZ Unfortunately anything before these dates is gone and their MW19 detection history is lost to time as they migrated to a new Site/forum You can try spin it anyway you like or assume I'm being a dick for the sake of it which I am not, they have weak AC bypass, their size is relatively irrelevant. I am no coding expert but Ricochet is still one of the weaker Kernel level ACs and they are still getting detected more than they should. Artificial Aiming is an extremely large and notorious cheat provider yet they aren't being detected bi-monthly because they clearly have a coder/coders that can bypass Ricochet efficiently where as EO cannot. I just see BS and call people out on it mate, the small majority of you can defend or make X excuse for EO or any other provider all you like. Never forget EO was still one of the only providers back in the day of MW19/WZ that were getting detected/banwaves when they had a no name weak AC before ricochet was ever implemented. Once again not being a dick, just stating facts and not making BS excuses to justify 8 detections in 1 year, some banwaves at a rate of more than 1 per consecutive month.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Notifications I think you're being generous with AA, looking at their website it seems almost dead entirely. Barely any posts in public sections at all in places like General. An it's always been a thing with Ricochet where most of their detections have been specifically targeted to that provider, such as EO/PO/Inferno and some others when they were around. You never hear of anyone speak about AA nor do their forums seem active so it's entirely plausible and more than likely that Acti/Rico just ignored them since they seem like deadweight to target. If AA had to pick up a lot of traction I very much doubt they would continue to remain undetected if Rico/Acti had to target them, eventually they'd end up like everyone else and get detected. EO detection history is insanely poor, that can't be disputed, but their original statement of "don't cheat on an account you don't want to lose" is factual.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Notifications I think you're being generous with AA, looking at their website it seems almost dead entirely. Barely any posts in public sections at all in places like General. An it's always been a thing with Ricochet where most of their detections have been specifically targeted to that provider, such as EO/PO/Inferno and some others when they were around. You never hear of anyone speak about AA nor do their forums seem active so it's entirely plausible and more than likely that Acti/Rico just ignored them since they seem like deadweight to target. If AA had to pick up a lot of traction I very much doubt they would continue to remain undetected if Rico/Acti had to target them, eventually they'd end up like everyone else and get detected. EO detection history is insanely poor, that can't be disputed, but their original statement of "don't cheat on an account you don't want to lose" is factual.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DariXOne Did you just judged AA just by looking at their general pub section? Lol Tell me then, AA was undetected from april 2021 till march 2024 and from there no detection in present time, AA dont want any publicity hence they dont even like being mentioned here, you trying to twist the reason for their long undetected period by saying they became dead weight lmao, if you only knew what i know but wont give out any info about that. And you are one of those who always went out their way to bash on AA in past, so just move on please.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OPgamingCHAIR All dates are from posts on your forum from Homie & Crotle, if you really need me to screenshot every post regarding detections and upload them here I can however I find that unnecessary as they're publicly visible on your own website so I'm not sure why you are disputing the detections or the dates or the authenticity of my claims when they are on your own forum. You do check your own forum posts right?

Quote:

Originally Posted by DariXOne Did you just judged AA just by looking at their general pub section? Lol Tell me then, AA was undetected from april 2021 till march 2024 and from there no detection in present time, AA dont want any publicity hence they dont even like being mentioned here, you trying to twist the reason for their long undetected period by saying they became dead weight lmao, if you only knew what i know but wont give out any info about that. And you are one of those who always went out their way to bash on AA in past, so just move on please.

Quote:

Originally Posted by EngineOwning You are either ignorant, incapable of understanding basic English, or both. My guess is the latter.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OPgamingCHAIR Ah the typical insult response, So I'm guessing none of these are detections? None of these happened? I'm making this up? I'm ignorant and I cant understand basic English? Please tell me if I'm wrong? I'm more than happy to own up to my mistakes, however this clearly looks like detection, after detection after detection with confirmed dates. You guys had a terrible terrible Detection History in MW19/WZ1, A good run in MW2/WZ with 1 detection and then an unfortunate Detection History in MW3/WZ with multiple detections, 6-7 events in 2024 for MW3/WZ alone some not even a month apart from one another. So really what is there to dispute? You know you're detection history his abysmal, the community who have half a braincell know it, the evidence is there but you want to resort to denying it and name calling? [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Quote:

Originally Posted by DennisMeister69 You talk alone about the cheat and include the spoofer xddd, you even take multiple screenshots of the same posts and other post that has nothing to do with it, you must be so dumb? You could easily make it 5 screenshots instead of 5000 and make it so confusing Anyway, i’ve always found it funny how people used to hype up Iwebz for having 'top-notch security' while trashing EO for having 'poor security.' The reality is, Iwebz got detected by the exact same method back then. People don’t seem to realize how big of a target EO is or how desperate Activision was to catch them using methods that didn’t even work well. Even with the Battlenet bans, EO has been transparent about it, and those bans affected less than 1 percent of their users, 99% of the providers would shut about it and tell it's their own fault.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OPgamingCHAIR Each post is it's own detection, truly how dense are you? No need to answer its a rhetorical question, spoofer may not be COD related but it still would have had everyone using it get banned.

Quote:

Originally Posted by EngineOwning You are either ignorant, incapable of understanding basic English, or both. My guess is the latter.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DennisMeister69 [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] Oh right.... each post... I see now why EO said @[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] do proper research, i might be high, but not stupid as you. you make it incredible confusing with the double posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by OPgamingCHAIR Keep coping mate, maybe lay off the drugs whilst you're at it

Quote:

Originally Posted by OPgamingCHAIR Each post is it's own detection, truly how dense are you? No need to answer its a rhetorical question, spoofer may not be COD related but it still would have had everyone using it get banned.