EXODUS APEX [External] - AIMBOT | ESP | HWID SPOOFER and MORE

latest detection?

Quote:

Originally Posted by LimitedRice latest detection?

Yesterday. And for the future commenters:
Everything can be found on website and Discord server.

Status changed to Working/Undetected. Have fun.

no spec optiion?

Quote:

Originally Posted by yappeneeze no spec optiion?

Spectator count? We do have it.

+Vouch

• Installation & Usability: 8/10
  - Easy to install and generally user-friendly.
  
• ESP Stability: 6/10
  - ESP feature flickers intermittently, which may hinder usability or situational awareness.
  
• Aimbot Performance: 7/10
  - Functional and effective, though not flawless; may miss or behave inconsistently at times.
  
• Security: 9/10
  - Used for several days at high aimbot settings without triggering a ban
  
• Overall Recommendation: 8/10
  - Despite minor flaws, the product delivers solid performance and reliability. Suitable for users seeking a balance between risk and functionality.

[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

If I use a spoofer, will it stay applied even after rebooting the PC? Or does it get removed when I restart the computer or close the Apex client?

Quote:

Originally Posted by shangusdnswl If I use a spoofer, will it stay applied even after rebooting the PC? Or does it get removed when I restart the computer or close the Apex client?

Our spoofer stays temporarily. Restarting PC will remove almost all effect.

I already purchased a 3-day subscription, and once it expires, I’ll probably buy a one-month subscription.

After rebooting, if my original "System > Information > Device ID, Product ID" was *A* and it was spoofed to *B*, it remains as *B* even after rebooting. Because of this, Windows activation prompts reappear, and device-locked programs require re-registration. For example, when logging into an alt account in Apex, the EA device registration window pops up again.

### Aimbot
- If Smoothing is set below 4, the screen feels choppy, which is strange. Your DPI and in-game sensitivity obviously play a role, but generally, accuracy should be below 60% and headshots below 15%. For reference, check the stats of top-tier Predator/pro players in the firing range. In Overwatch and Marvel Rivals, most top players had around 50% accuracy (and ~10% headshots).
- R99 deals 10 damage per bullet. Against targets with 175 HP (blue armor) and 200 HP (purple armor), with a 27-round mag:
- At 66.7% accuracy, blue armor dies in one mag.
- At 74.1% accuracy, purple armor dies in one mag.
Some communities claim that killing an enemy with one SMG mag is a sign of skill, but this requires abnormally high accuracy, so be cautious. It’s more important to find a sensitivity that fits your playstyle while keeping accuracy below detectable levels.

### Visuals
- Includes ESP and features similar to other cheats. Personally, I don’t use most visual effects (except distance/position) as they can be distracting. There’s also a radar feature—adjust it to your playstyle.

### Bunny Hop, Tap Strafe, Super Glide
- All can be automated. The only issue is that if Tap Strafe is enabled during Jumpmaster, holding 'W' for speed boost prevents you from dropping. You’ll need to toggle it off manually or pass Jumpmaster to someone else.

### Other Notes
- The developer actively plays the game and shares updates, making them more trustworthy than other providers. Their Discord has configs and useful info.
- Personally, I believe detectable cheats usually result in bans. Since their Discord screenshots include Master-Predator players, I consider them reliable.
- Most importantly, avoid playing with high accuracy (including headshot rates). There’s no need to take unnecessary risks—playing as a team is better.

The spoofing part is the only thing that’s confusing.
If it’s meant to be temporary, the device info should revert after a reboot—but it stays changed. Even after retrying, the Device ID and Product ID remain altered, so any device-locked programs or licenses recognize it as a different machine.

This suggests you’d only need to spoof when an account gets banned, not every time.



------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

After the EAC update on June 5th, running the spoofer on June 6th caused HWID ban occurrences. Despite multiple reports on Discord, the issue has not been resolved.

Using a third-party spoofer (a verified vendor from this forum, so no issues are expected) and performing a clean Windows reinstall, Account A was able to reach Master rank. However, when tested with Account B, which has over 1,000 levels, the ban reoccurred within 3-4 days.

While this could be blamed on user error, if that were the case, Account A should have experienced the same ban within 200 games. Shadow Apex is known as a reseller product, and I don't think its security (or the "humanize" nature of its aim) can last for several months. The random value for this product was set at 100 with a high smoothness.

On the other hand, no such ban issues occurred when using Proofcore or Bunny, so I think using the spoofer only for a short period is appropriate. However, in those cases, a temporary spoofer must be running alongside. It is unfortunate that the detection and improvement of this spoofer issue have not been addressed. Although the license remains valid, it is questionable whether I will continue using it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by farnese I already purchased a 3-day subscription, and once it expires, I’ll probably buy a one-month subscription. After rebooting, if my original "System > Information > Device ID, Product ID" was *A* and it was spoofed to *B*, it remains as *B* even after rebooting. Because of this, Windows activation prompts reappear, and device-locked programs require re-registration. For example, when logging into an alt account in Apex, the EA device registration window pops up again. ### Aimbot - If Smoothing is set below 4, the screen feels choppy, which is strange. Your DPI and in-game sensitivity obviously play a role, but generally, accuracy should be below 60% and headshots below 15%. For reference, check the stats of top-tier Predator/pro players in the firing range. In Overwatch and Marvel Rivals, most top players had around 50% accuracy (and ~10% headshots). - R99 deals 10 damage per bullet. Against targets with 175 HP (blue armor) and 200 HP (purple armor), with a 27-round mag: - At 66.7% accuracy, blue armor dies in one mag. - At 74.1% accuracy, purple armor dies in one mag. Some communities claim that killing an enemy with one SMG mag is a sign of skill, but this requires abnormally high accuracy, so be cautious. It’s more important to find a sensitivity that fits your playstyle while keeping accuracy below detectable levels. ### Visuals - Includes ESP and features similar to other cheats. Personally, I don’t use most visual effects (except distance/position) as they can be distracting. There’s also a radar feature—adjust it to your playstyle. ### Bunny Hop, Tap Strafe, Super Glide - All can be automated. The only issue is that if Tap Strafe is enabled during Jumpmaster, holding 'W' for speed boost prevents you from dropping. You’ll need to toggle it off manually or pass Jumpmaster to someone else. ### Other Notes - The developer actively plays the game and shares updates, making them more trustworthy than other providers. Their Discord has configs and useful info. - Personally, I believe detectable cheats usually result in bans. Since their Discord screenshots include Master-Predator players, I consider them reliable. - Most importantly, avoid playing with high accuracy (including headshot rates). There’s no need to take unnecessary risks—playing as a team is better. The spoofing part is the only thing that’s confusing. If it’s meant to be temporary, the device info should revert after a reboot—but it stays changed. Even after retrying, the Device ID and Product ID remain altered, so any device-locked programs or licenses recognize it as a different machine. This suggests you’d only need to spoof when an account gets banned, not every time.

Thanks for the review.
What you're reffering to as "spoofer" is not actually what spoofer does, the cleaner is the one that changes VolumeID permanently. Your disks and other information will not change permanently and that's why you will get banned again if you won't use the spoofer.

In the recent days, I have personally experienced and carefully tested repeated bans in Apex Legends while using the Exodus spoofer and cleaner. These bans occurred despite minimizing cheat functionality, using only ESP (visuals), and taking thorough steps such as full system cleaning, VPN usage, and hardware ID protection procedures.

Problem Summary:

Even after uninstalling the EA App and Apex Legends using proper deep-clean tools (Revo Uninstaller), applying both the Exodus cleaner and spoofer before logging in, and ensuring only minimal features like ESP were active, I was consistently banned within a few matches or even within hours of account creation.

These ban patterns are highly consistent with hardware ID (HWID) bans. The issue is not whether the cheat itself is detected — because in fact, after reformatting my PC and running Apex without any spoofer or cleaner, I was able to play for over 60 hours without getting banned, even with all cheat features turned on.

This clearly shows:

The cheat features (ESP, aimbot, etc.) are not currently being detected directly.
The spoofer and cleaner provided by Exodus have become ineffective.

The Core Issue:

Instead of acknowledging this problem, the Exodus staff continuously repeat the phrase:
"Join VC and stream. You gonna play with spoofer only and show how it's dead."

This statement fundamentally misunderstands both:

1. How hardware bans work, and
2. How scientific testing and statistical validity are established.

A single-streaming session (or even multiple) is statistically irrelevant when testing HWID spoofers. This request is an example of anecdotal reasoning, ignoring the large, reproducible pattern across multiple accounts, systems, and users.

Also, the fact that such a "stream test" is suggested places the burden of proof on the paying customer. Spoofer vendors are expected to provide reliable products, not demand customers waste their limited-time licenses (for example, a 3-day key) on potentially invalid experiments to prove a product’s failure.

The Scientific Basis:

Through controlled experiments:

When using the Exodus spoofer → consistent bans occurred within hours or a few games.
When NOT using the spoofer (even with all cheats enabled) → no bans occurred after 60+ hours.

This is a clear falsification of the spoofer’s effectiveness.
Under the basic principles of null and alternative hypothesis testing, the spoofer has demonstrably failed to protect the system’s HWID.

Further, after ban reports, I submitted a formal appeal to EA, which was rejected with the response that "cheating was clearly detected." If the spoofer had worked properly, my real HWID would not have been flagged, and the ban should not have affected the system in this way. (An account that used only the spoofer without any cheat features enabled was banned, and when I appealed, EA's customer support responded that 'the cheating activity was clear and confirmed.)

Key Logical Flaws in Exodus’s Defense:

False Premise: They assume individual streaming sessions can disprove wide-scope ban patterns.

Anecdotal Fallacy: They rely on isolated cases instead of reproducible data.
Shifting the Burden of Proof: The vendor demands the paying customer "prove" failure instead of providing verifiable protection.

Survivorship Bias: They disregard all the users who are consistently being banned and focus only on isolated cases that seem to work.

Final Thoughts:

I am not criticizing the cheat functionality itself. The aimbot and ESP features are working as expected. The problem lies specifically with the spoofer’s failure after recent anti-cheat updates. Other providers selling spoofers openly admit that spoofers can become detectable, especially after updates — yet Exodus insists their spoofer is flawless and unaffected. This is unrealistic and unprofessional.

If this issue is not transparently addressed and the spoofer is not properly fixed, there is no reasonable justification for customers to renew their licenses.


＃ I'm a license-renewing customer, and since they could revoke my license for stating facts, I can't provide more detailed explanations. They keep demanding streamed evidence to address this issue, and if it remains unresolved, I'm feeling extremely skeptical about renewing my next license.

As you've achieved Predator rank, you already know this: whether cheating or not, climbing solo ranked takes an absurd amount of time—and teammates are trolls. If aiming for Master+, you’d obviously queue as duo/trio. My regular duo/trio partners also used this product, and they got banned solely for the spoofer issue too.

Even with all this, if you still claim "no problem exists," I have nothing more to say. The cheat itself performs flawlessly—zero frame drops and competitively priced in the market. The only current issue is the spoofer (not third-party spoofers, but the one built into this Apex cheat). If this persists, we’ll have no choice but to switch products.

[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Quote:

Originally Posted by DriftAero In the recent days, I have personally experienced and carefully tested repeated bans in Apex Legends while using the Exodus spoofer and cleaner. These bans occurred despite minimizing cheat functionality, using only ESP (visuals), and taking thorough steps such as full system cleaning, VPN usage, and hardware ID protection procedures. Problem Summary: Even after uninstalling the EA App and Apex Legends using proper deep-clean tools (Revo Uninstaller), applying both the Exodus cleaner and spoofer before logging in, and ensuring only minimal features like ESP were active, I was consistently banned within a few matches or even within hours of account creation. These ban patterns are highly consistent with hardware ID (HWID) bans. The issue is not whether the cheat itself is detected — because in fact, after reformatting my PC and running Apex without any spoofer or cleaner, I was able to play for over 60 hours without getting banned, even with all cheat features turned on. This clearly shows: The cheat features (ESP, aimbot, etc.) are not currently being detected directly. The spoofer and cleaner provided by Exodus have become ineffective. The Core Issue: Instead of acknowledging this problem, the Exodus staff continuously repeat the phrase: "Join VC and stream. You gonna play with spoofer only and show how it's dead." This statement fundamentally misunderstands both: 1. How hardware bans work, and 2. How scientific testing and statistical validity are established. A single-streaming session (or even multiple) is statistically irrelevant when testing HWID spoofers. This request is an example of anecdotal reasoning, ignoring the large, reproducible pattern across multiple accounts, systems, and users. Also, the fact that such a "stream test" is suggested places the burden of proof on the paying customer. Spoofer vendors are expected to provide reliable products, not demand customers waste their limited-time licenses (for example, a 3-day key) on potentially invalid experiments to prove a product’s failure. The Scientific Basis: Through controlled experiments: When using the Exodus spoofer → consistent bans occurred within hours or a few games. When NOT using the spoofer (even with all cheats enabled) → no bans occurred after 60+ hours. This is a clear falsification of the spoofer’s effectiveness. Under the basic principles of null and alternative hypothesis testing, the spoofer has demonstrably failed to protect the system’s HWID. Further, after ban reports, I submitted a formal appeal to EA, which was rejected with the response that "cheating was clearly detected." If the spoofer had worked properly, my real HWID would not have been flagged, and the ban should not have affected the system in this way. (An account that used only the spoofer without any cheat features enabled was banned, and when I appealed, EA's customer support responded that 'the cheating activity was clear and confirmed.) Key Logical Flaws in Exodus’s Defense: False Premise: They assume individual streaming sessions can disprove wide-scope ban patterns. Anecdotal Fallacy: They rely on isolated cases instead of reproducible data. Shifting the Burden of Proof: The vendor demands the paying customer "prove" failure instead of providing verifiable protection. Survivorship Bias: They disregard all the users who are consistently being banned and focus only on isolated cases that seem to work. Final Thoughts: I am not criticizing the cheat functionality itself. The aimbot and ESP features are working as expected. The problem lies specifically with the spoofer’s failure after recent anti-cheat updates. Other providers selling spoofers openly admit that spoofers can become detectable, especially after updates — yet Exodus insists their spoofer is flawless and unaffected. This is unrealistic and unprofessional. If this issue is not transparently addressed and the spoofer is not properly fixed, there is no reasonable justification for customers to renew their licenses. ＃ I'm a license-renewing customer, and since they could revoke my license for stating facts, I can't provide more detailed explanations. They keep demanding streamed evidence to address this issue, and if it remains unresolved, I'm feeling extremely skeptical about renewing my next license. As you've achieved Predator rank, you already know this: whether cheating or not, climbing solo ranked takes an absurd amount of time—and teammates are trolls. If aiming for Master+, you’d obviously queue as duo/trio. My regular duo/trio partners also used this product, and they got banned solely for the spoofer issue too. Even with all this, if you still claim "no problem exists," I have nothing more to say. The cheat itself performs flawlessly—zero frame drops and competitively priced in the market. The only current issue is the spoofer (not third-party spoofers, but the one built into this Apex cheat). If this persists, we’ll have no choice but to switch products. [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...] [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Everyone who played with spoofer only (which I saw on Discord stream) never got banned (tested it 4 days ago). No false positives. So you're clearly ARP or TPM banned and we don't spoof those, thanks.

Btw, you're the isolated case because there are much much more people that never got banned after Feb 19. If you can't prove by showing getting banned on stream on public voice channel = you are a lier. So nothing to provide if you can't provide proofs, try again.

Everything is transperent as it can be, nothing to fix.

Final thoughts:
Since people that getting banned and people that not are about 1/100 makes it an user issue that you clearly trying to hide. Also our active customers would never hide their identity like you do, simply no reasons to hide anything right. There is no problems with the product for sure, at least for now.

1. the aimbot, esp, visuals, and movement features are working fine and there have been no bans caused by using these features.

2. this product is also being resold under the name ‘shxdow’ with exactly the same ui.

3. i don't really care about past detections. but if this continues, there’s no reason to renew the license. it honestly feels like the devs are intentionally refusing to acknowledge the detection.

4. the spoofer has been detected since june 6. just running the spoofer alone results in bans.

if the spoofer was actually working, it should protect the original hwid. even if your hwid was previously banned, a properly working spoofer would bypass it and you wouldn’t get chain-banned or hwid-tracked. but in this case, bans are still happening even when using the spoofer, which clearly means the spoofer is not functioning correctly and is fully detected.

also, there was a recent eac update that specifically focused on improving spoofer detection and hwid tracking, and some articles confirmed this change.

also, the reseller version ‘shxdow’ had a ban wave on june 6 as well. in exodus discord, several users also reported ban waves starting from june 6.

the reason why some people say they are not banned is because the ban only happens when the spoofer is executed. i tested with an account that used only the spoofer and it got banned, and ea specifically said that in the ban message.

some users in discord are saying they got banned even when just using visuals — but that’s most likely because they ran the spoofer in the background.

please stop asking people to prove this via vc or stream. instead, you should either fix the spoofer or completely separate it from the cheat.
as of now, the spoofer is dtc.

the cheat itself is still ud.

[Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

Quote:

Originally Posted by shangusdnswl 1. the aimbot, esp, visuals, and movement features are working fine and there have been no bans caused by using these features. 2. this product is also being resold under the name ‘shxdow’ with exactly the same ui. 3. i don't really care about past detections. but if this continues, there’s no reason to renew the license. it honestly feels like the devs are intentionally refusing to acknowledge the detection. 4. the spoofer has been detected since june 6. just running the spoofer alone results in bans. if the spoofer was actually working, it should protect the original hwid. even if your hwid was previously banned, a properly working spoofer would bypass it and you wouldn’t get chain-banned or hwid-tracked. but in this case, bans are still happening even when using the spoofer, which clearly means the spoofer is not functioning correctly and is fully detected. also, there was a recent eac update that specifically focused on improving spoofer detection and hwid tracking, and some articles confirmed this change. also, the reseller version ‘shxdow’ had a ban wave on june 6 as well. in exodus discord, several users also reported ban waves starting from june 6. the reason why some people say they are not banned is because the ban only happens when the spoofer is executed. i tested with an account that used only the spoofer and it got banned, and ea specifically said that in the ban message. some users in discord are saying they got banned even when just using visuals — but that’s most likely because they ran the spoofer in the background. please stop asking people to prove this via vc or stream. instead, you should either fix the spoofer or completely separate it from the cheat. as of now, the spoofer is dtc. the cheat itself is still ud. [Only registered and activated users can see links. Click Here To Register...]

I have asked people to play with spoofer only numerous time, nobody got banned since Feb 19 unless they have TPM or ARP ban and we don't spoof both. Feel free to contact me on Discord, join VC and stream the whole time you're playing with spoofer only.

Edit: Still don't see your ticket or invite to VC, most likely you know that you did something wrong and just ignored my reply.

Updated to the last game patch.